Validity and reliability of Internet-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders

a systematic review

Suresh Mani, Shobha Sharma, Baharudin Omar, Aatit Paungmali, Leonard Joseph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this review is to systematically explore and summarise the validity and reliability of telerehabilitation (TR)-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders. Method: A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted using a number of electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL, published between January 2000 and May 2015. The studies examined the validity, inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of TR-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal conditions were included. Two independent reviewers used the Quality Appraisal Tool for studies of diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool to assess the methodological quality of reliability and validity studies respectively. Results: A total of 898 hits were achieved, of which 11 articles based on inclusion criteria were reviewed. Nine studies explored the concurrent validity, inter- and intra-rater reliabilities, while two studies examined only the concurrent validity. Reviewed studies were moderate to good in methodological quality. The physiotherapy assessments such as pain, swelling, range of motion, muscle strength, balance, gait and functional assessment demonstrated good concurrent validity. However, the reported concurrent validity of lumbar spine posture, special orthopaedic tests, neurodynamic tests and scar assessments ranged from low to moderate. Conclusion: TR-based physiotherapy assessment was technically feasible with overall good concurrent validity and excellent reliability, except for lumbar spine posture, orthopaedic special tests, neurodynamic testa and scar assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379-391
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Internet
Posture
Cicatrix
Orthopedics
Spine
Muscle Strength
Articular Range of Motion
Gait
PubMed
Libraries
Cohort Studies
Databases
Pain
Telerehabilitation

Keywords

  • assessment
  • musculoskeletal disorders
  • physiotherapy
  • reliability
  • Telerehabilitation
  • validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Validity and reliability of Internet-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders : a systematic review. / Mani, Suresh; Sharma, Shobha; Omar, Baharudin; Paungmali, Aatit; Joseph, Leonard.

In: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.04.2017, p. 379-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2fc99eaa58964aafa5bce7aad2c647e9,
title = "Validity and reliability of Internet-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this review is to systematically explore and summarise the validity and reliability of telerehabilitation (TR)-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders. Method: A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted using a number of electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL, published between January 2000 and May 2015. The studies examined the validity, inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of TR-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal conditions were included. Two independent reviewers used the Quality Appraisal Tool for studies of diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool to assess the methodological quality of reliability and validity studies respectively. Results: A total of 898 hits were achieved, of which 11 articles based on inclusion criteria were reviewed. Nine studies explored the concurrent validity, inter- and intra-rater reliabilities, while two studies examined only the concurrent validity. Reviewed studies were moderate to good in methodological quality. The physiotherapy assessments such as pain, swelling, range of motion, muscle strength, balance, gait and functional assessment demonstrated good concurrent validity. However, the reported concurrent validity of lumbar spine posture, special orthopaedic tests, neurodynamic tests and scar assessments ranged from low to moderate. Conclusion: TR-based physiotherapy assessment was technically feasible with overall good concurrent validity and excellent reliability, except for lumbar spine posture, orthopaedic special tests, neurodynamic testa and scar assessment.",
keywords = "assessment, musculoskeletal disorders, physiotherapy, reliability, Telerehabilitation, validity",
author = "Suresh Mani and Shobha Sharma and Baharudin Omar and Aatit Paungmali and Leonard Joseph",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1357633X16642369",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "379--391",
journal = "Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare",
issn = "1357-633X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity and reliability of Internet-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Mani, Suresh

AU - Sharma, Shobha

AU - Omar, Baharudin

AU - Paungmali, Aatit

AU - Joseph, Leonard

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this review is to systematically explore and summarise the validity and reliability of telerehabilitation (TR)-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders. Method: A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted using a number of electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL, published between January 2000 and May 2015. The studies examined the validity, inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of TR-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal conditions were included. Two independent reviewers used the Quality Appraisal Tool for studies of diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool to assess the methodological quality of reliability and validity studies respectively. Results: A total of 898 hits were achieved, of which 11 articles based on inclusion criteria were reviewed. Nine studies explored the concurrent validity, inter- and intra-rater reliabilities, while two studies examined only the concurrent validity. Reviewed studies were moderate to good in methodological quality. The physiotherapy assessments such as pain, swelling, range of motion, muscle strength, balance, gait and functional assessment demonstrated good concurrent validity. However, the reported concurrent validity of lumbar spine posture, special orthopaedic tests, neurodynamic tests and scar assessments ranged from low to moderate. Conclusion: TR-based physiotherapy assessment was technically feasible with overall good concurrent validity and excellent reliability, except for lumbar spine posture, orthopaedic special tests, neurodynamic testa and scar assessment.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this review is to systematically explore and summarise the validity and reliability of telerehabilitation (TR)-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders. Method: A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted using a number of electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL, published between January 2000 and May 2015. The studies examined the validity, inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of TR-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal conditions were included. Two independent reviewers used the Quality Appraisal Tool for studies of diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool to assess the methodological quality of reliability and validity studies respectively. Results: A total of 898 hits were achieved, of which 11 articles based on inclusion criteria were reviewed. Nine studies explored the concurrent validity, inter- and intra-rater reliabilities, while two studies examined only the concurrent validity. Reviewed studies were moderate to good in methodological quality. The physiotherapy assessments such as pain, swelling, range of motion, muscle strength, balance, gait and functional assessment demonstrated good concurrent validity. However, the reported concurrent validity of lumbar spine posture, special orthopaedic tests, neurodynamic tests and scar assessments ranged from low to moderate. Conclusion: TR-based physiotherapy assessment was technically feasible with overall good concurrent validity and excellent reliability, except for lumbar spine posture, orthopaedic special tests, neurodynamic testa and scar assessment.

KW - assessment

KW - musculoskeletal disorders

KW - physiotherapy

KW - reliability

KW - Telerehabilitation

KW - validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018750956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018750956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1357633X16642369

DO - 10.1177/1357633X16642369

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 379

EP - 391

JO - Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

JF - Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

SN - 1357-633X

IS - 3

ER -