Utilization of value engineering to optimize concreting productivity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study highlights the topics of productivity monitoring and measurement in constructing sector. To develop the productivity, several measures have been done in some area of construction projects. Concreting process is taken as case study. The finding pointed the relative importance of this activity in terms of time and cost. Three methods of concreting process were examined; manual method, semi-mechanized method and full-mechanized method. For small size works, the manual method was the best for concreting work less than 50 m3 for work more than 50 m3 and less than 260 m3, the Semi Mechanized Method was the best and finally for work size more than 260 m3, the full mechanized method was the most suitable. A comparative model has been developed to determine the best method of construction, its cost and duration. This model can also be used as a predicting tool for selecting the method during the planning phase of project.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3479-3484
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Applied Sciences
Volume8
Issue number19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Value engineering
Productivity
Costs
Planning
Monitoring

Keywords

  • Concreting process
  • Productivity measurement
  • Value engineering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Utilization of value engineering to optimize concreting productivity. / Abd, A. M.; Abd, S. M.; Ismail, Amiruddin; Mohd. Zain, Muhammad Fauzi.

In: Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 19, 2008, p. 3479-3484.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{768416e8871f449b8d2cf82f9b8bf5d6,
title = "Utilization of value engineering to optimize concreting productivity",
abstract = "This study highlights the topics of productivity monitoring and measurement in constructing sector. To develop the productivity, several measures have been done in some area of construction projects. Concreting process is taken as case study. The finding pointed the relative importance of this activity in terms of time and cost. Three methods of concreting process were examined; manual method, semi-mechanized method and full-mechanized method. For small size works, the manual method was the best for concreting work less than 50 m3 for work more than 50 m3 and less than 260 m3, the Semi Mechanized Method was the best and finally for work size more than 260 m3, the full mechanized method was the most suitable. A comparative model has been developed to determine the best method of construction, its cost and duration. This model can also be used as a predicting tool for selecting the method during the planning phase of project.",
keywords = "Concreting process, Productivity measurement, Value engineering",
author = "Abd, {A. M.} and Abd, {S. M.} and Amiruddin Ismail and {Mohd. Zain}, {Muhammad Fauzi}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.3923/jas.2008.3479.3484",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "3479--3484",
journal = "Journal of Applied Sciences",
issn = "1812-5654",
publisher = "Asian Network for Scientific Information",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utilization of value engineering to optimize concreting productivity

AU - Abd, A. M.

AU - Abd, S. M.

AU - Ismail, Amiruddin

AU - Mohd. Zain, Muhammad Fauzi

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This study highlights the topics of productivity monitoring and measurement in constructing sector. To develop the productivity, several measures have been done in some area of construction projects. Concreting process is taken as case study. The finding pointed the relative importance of this activity in terms of time and cost. Three methods of concreting process were examined; manual method, semi-mechanized method and full-mechanized method. For small size works, the manual method was the best for concreting work less than 50 m3 for work more than 50 m3 and less than 260 m3, the Semi Mechanized Method was the best and finally for work size more than 260 m3, the full mechanized method was the most suitable. A comparative model has been developed to determine the best method of construction, its cost and duration. This model can also be used as a predicting tool for selecting the method during the planning phase of project.

AB - This study highlights the topics of productivity monitoring and measurement in constructing sector. To develop the productivity, several measures have been done in some area of construction projects. Concreting process is taken as case study. The finding pointed the relative importance of this activity in terms of time and cost. Three methods of concreting process were examined; manual method, semi-mechanized method and full-mechanized method. For small size works, the manual method was the best for concreting work less than 50 m3 for work more than 50 m3 and less than 260 m3, the Semi Mechanized Method was the best and finally for work size more than 260 m3, the full mechanized method was the most suitable. A comparative model has been developed to determine the best method of construction, its cost and duration. This model can also be used as a predicting tool for selecting the method during the planning phase of project.

KW - Concreting process

KW - Productivity measurement

KW - Value engineering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649544081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649544081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3923/jas.2008.3479.3484

DO - 10.3923/jas.2008.3479.3484

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67649544081

VL - 8

SP - 3479

EP - 3484

JO - Journal of Applied Sciences

JF - Journal of Applied Sciences

SN - 1812-5654

IS - 19

ER -