Uncertainty propagation assessment in railway-track degradation model using bayes linear theory

Mohd Haniff Osman, Sakdirat Kaewuruen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Periodic inspection could be regarded as a form of insurance to check for variation in the performance of the empirical-based track degradation model. Excessive track inspection, however, hurts economic maintenance and probably occurs because of inadequate knowledge to manage uncertainty in the track degradation model. Through regularly assessing uncertainty propagation in the model parameters, the relative importance of inspection decisions can be evaluated, and this may remove the need for excessive inspection(s). Because the evaluation process has a strict time limit, (i.e., before the next inspection arrives), a simple assessment method is required. Thus, this paper introduces a semiprobabilistic method driven by the Bayes linear theory to assess uncertainty propagation in the parameters of the linear model of track-geometry degradation. Through the assessment, two quality measures, namely, partial size and bearing adjustment of expectation of prior belief, iteratively display how parametric uncertainty propagates from one inspection to the next. As a result, in general, the proposed method shows the existence of a transition point in the inspection plan, i.e., a splitting of inspection decisions into two categories: exciting, and as expected. Although track inspection is recursive, a revision is suggested for inspection decisions under the latter category. A practical use of the proposed method is presented using real data and discussed in this paper.

Original languageEnglish
Article number04018026
JournalJournal of Transportation Engineering Part A: Systems
Volume144
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

German Federal Railways
Inspection
uncertainty
Degradation
linear model
insurance
mathematics
Bearings (structural)
Uncertainty
evaluation
performance
economics
Insurance
Economics
Geometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Transportation

Cite this

Uncertainty propagation assessment in railway-track degradation model using bayes linear theory. / Osman, Mohd Haniff; Kaewuruen, Sakdirat.

In: Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A: Systems, Vol. 144, No. 7, 04018026, 01.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{33ec242244bd4a70922d0d862f4765f6,
title = "Uncertainty propagation assessment in railway-track degradation model using bayes linear theory",
abstract = "Periodic inspection could be regarded as a form of insurance to check for variation in the performance of the empirical-based track degradation model. Excessive track inspection, however, hurts economic maintenance and probably occurs because of inadequate knowledge to manage uncertainty in the track degradation model. Through regularly assessing uncertainty propagation in the model parameters, the relative importance of inspection decisions can be evaluated, and this may remove the need for excessive inspection(s). Because the evaluation process has a strict time limit, (i.e., before the next inspection arrives), a simple assessment method is required. Thus, this paper introduces a semiprobabilistic method driven by the Bayes linear theory to assess uncertainty propagation in the parameters of the linear model of track-geometry degradation. Through the assessment, two quality measures, namely, partial size and bearing adjustment of expectation of prior belief, iteratively display how parametric uncertainty propagates from one inspection to the next. As a result, in general, the proposed method shows the existence of a transition point in the inspection plan, i.e., a splitting of inspection decisions into two categories: exciting, and as expected. Although track inspection is recursive, a revision is suggested for inspection decisions under the latter category. A practical use of the proposed method is presented using real data and discussed in this paper.",
author = "Osman, {Mohd Haniff} and Sakdirat Kaewuruen",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/JTEPBS.0000146",
language = "English",
volume = "144",
journal = "Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A: Systems",
issn = "2473-2907",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncertainty propagation assessment in railway-track degradation model using bayes linear theory

AU - Osman, Mohd Haniff

AU - Kaewuruen, Sakdirat

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Periodic inspection could be regarded as a form of insurance to check for variation in the performance of the empirical-based track degradation model. Excessive track inspection, however, hurts economic maintenance and probably occurs because of inadequate knowledge to manage uncertainty in the track degradation model. Through regularly assessing uncertainty propagation in the model parameters, the relative importance of inspection decisions can be evaluated, and this may remove the need for excessive inspection(s). Because the evaluation process has a strict time limit, (i.e., before the next inspection arrives), a simple assessment method is required. Thus, this paper introduces a semiprobabilistic method driven by the Bayes linear theory to assess uncertainty propagation in the parameters of the linear model of track-geometry degradation. Through the assessment, two quality measures, namely, partial size and bearing adjustment of expectation of prior belief, iteratively display how parametric uncertainty propagates from one inspection to the next. As a result, in general, the proposed method shows the existence of a transition point in the inspection plan, i.e., a splitting of inspection decisions into two categories: exciting, and as expected. Although track inspection is recursive, a revision is suggested for inspection decisions under the latter category. A practical use of the proposed method is presented using real data and discussed in this paper.

AB - Periodic inspection could be regarded as a form of insurance to check for variation in the performance of the empirical-based track degradation model. Excessive track inspection, however, hurts economic maintenance and probably occurs because of inadequate knowledge to manage uncertainty in the track degradation model. Through regularly assessing uncertainty propagation in the model parameters, the relative importance of inspection decisions can be evaluated, and this may remove the need for excessive inspection(s). Because the evaluation process has a strict time limit, (i.e., before the next inspection arrives), a simple assessment method is required. Thus, this paper introduces a semiprobabilistic method driven by the Bayes linear theory to assess uncertainty propagation in the parameters of the linear model of track-geometry degradation. Through the assessment, two quality measures, namely, partial size and bearing adjustment of expectation of prior belief, iteratively display how parametric uncertainty propagates from one inspection to the next. As a result, in general, the proposed method shows the existence of a transition point in the inspection plan, i.e., a splitting of inspection decisions into two categories: exciting, and as expected. Although track inspection is recursive, a revision is suggested for inspection decisions under the latter category. A practical use of the proposed method is presented using real data and discussed in this paper.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045873569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045873569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000146

DO - 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000146

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045873569

VL - 144

JO - Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A: Systems

JF - Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A: Systems

SN - 2473-2907

IS - 7

M1 - 04018026

ER -