Transparent assessment model in architecture design studio

Eastern mediterranean university as case study

Badiossadat Hassanpour, Adi Irfan Che Ani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Art and architecture are multidisciplinary fields with complicated assessments that, similar to the teaching and the learning process, are inconsistent with common assessment models. During submission, the presence of jurors, who have different approaches and standards for evaluating design projects, makes this issue more complicated. Numerous assessment and grading models are being used in architecture departments around the world. Some of these methods are based on the experiences of instructors from their lives as students, whereas some are based on university systems. Grading policies seem to be clear in most fields, but when the object of grading is an artistic product with different levels to be assessed and graded, the issue becomes more complex. This observation is especially true in the case in which quality is given a numerical grade. The nature of skills that students are expected to develop and that are going to be assessed is often subjective. Such skills include invention, problem solving, and presentation. Problems of reliability, personal criterion, and unique perceptions lend difficulty in assessing such skills using traditional methods. This research suggests that a criteria-based assessment and grading model is a more effective model in promoting student learning, making assessment and grading less complex and more explicit. The effectiveness and reliability of the proposed and implemented criteria-based grading system has been tested at Eastern Mediterranean University using distributed questionnaires and a Rasch measurement system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-43
Number of pages7
JournalOpen House International
Volume40
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Studios
grading
student
university
learning
Students
art
teaching
university system
Patents and inventions
invention
learning process
instructor
Teaching
questionnaire
method
experience

Keywords

  • Architecture design studio
  • Criteria
  • Grading and assessment
  • Rasch system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urban Studies
  • Architecture
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Transparent assessment model in architecture design studio : Eastern mediterranean university as case study. / Hassanpour, Badiossadat; Che Ani, Adi Irfan.

In: Open House International, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2015, p. 37-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c87d1162dc8e4463a90e72155e994fd6,
title = "Transparent assessment model in architecture design studio: Eastern mediterranean university as case study",
abstract = "Art and architecture are multidisciplinary fields with complicated assessments that, similar to the teaching and the learning process, are inconsistent with common assessment models. During submission, the presence of jurors, who have different approaches and standards for evaluating design projects, makes this issue more complicated. Numerous assessment and grading models are being used in architecture departments around the world. Some of these methods are based on the experiences of instructors from their lives as students, whereas some are based on university systems. Grading policies seem to be clear in most fields, but when the object of grading is an artistic product with different levels to be assessed and graded, the issue becomes more complex. This observation is especially true in the case in which quality is given a numerical grade. The nature of skills that students are expected to develop and that are going to be assessed is often subjective. Such skills include invention, problem solving, and presentation. Problems of reliability, personal criterion, and unique perceptions lend difficulty in assessing such skills using traditional methods. This research suggests that a criteria-based assessment and grading model is a more effective model in promoting student learning, making assessment and grading less complex and more explicit. The effectiveness and reliability of the proposed and implemented criteria-based grading system has been tested at Eastern Mediterranean University using distributed questionnaires and a Rasch measurement system.",
keywords = "Architecture design studio, Criteria, Grading and assessment, Rasch system",
author = "Badiossadat Hassanpour and {Che Ani}, {Adi Irfan}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "37--43",
journal = "Open House International",
issn = "0168-2601",
publisher = "Open House International Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transparent assessment model in architecture design studio

T2 - Eastern mediterranean university as case study

AU - Hassanpour, Badiossadat

AU - Che Ani, Adi Irfan

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Art and architecture are multidisciplinary fields with complicated assessments that, similar to the teaching and the learning process, are inconsistent with common assessment models. During submission, the presence of jurors, who have different approaches and standards for evaluating design projects, makes this issue more complicated. Numerous assessment and grading models are being used in architecture departments around the world. Some of these methods are based on the experiences of instructors from their lives as students, whereas some are based on university systems. Grading policies seem to be clear in most fields, but when the object of grading is an artistic product with different levels to be assessed and graded, the issue becomes more complex. This observation is especially true in the case in which quality is given a numerical grade. The nature of skills that students are expected to develop and that are going to be assessed is often subjective. Such skills include invention, problem solving, and presentation. Problems of reliability, personal criterion, and unique perceptions lend difficulty in assessing such skills using traditional methods. This research suggests that a criteria-based assessment and grading model is a more effective model in promoting student learning, making assessment and grading less complex and more explicit. The effectiveness and reliability of the proposed and implemented criteria-based grading system has been tested at Eastern Mediterranean University using distributed questionnaires and a Rasch measurement system.

AB - Art and architecture are multidisciplinary fields with complicated assessments that, similar to the teaching and the learning process, are inconsistent with common assessment models. During submission, the presence of jurors, who have different approaches and standards for evaluating design projects, makes this issue more complicated. Numerous assessment and grading models are being used in architecture departments around the world. Some of these methods are based on the experiences of instructors from their lives as students, whereas some are based on university systems. Grading policies seem to be clear in most fields, but when the object of grading is an artistic product with different levels to be assessed and graded, the issue becomes more complex. This observation is especially true in the case in which quality is given a numerical grade. The nature of skills that students are expected to develop and that are going to be assessed is often subjective. Such skills include invention, problem solving, and presentation. Problems of reliability, personal criterion, and unique perceptions lend difficulty in assessing such skills using traditional methods. This research suggests that a criteria-based assessment and grading model is a more effective model in promoting student learning, making assessment and grading less complex and more explicit. The effectiveness and reliability of the proposed and implemented criteria-based grading system has been tested at Eastern Mediterranean University using distributed questionnaires and a Rasch measurement system.

KW - Architecture design studio

KW - Criteria

KW - Grading and assessment

KW - Rasch system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938218894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938218894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 37

EP - 43

JO - Open House International

JF - Open House International

SN - 0168-2601

IS - 2

ER -