The syntax of applicative constructions in spoken sudanese Arabic

Fazal Mohamed Mohamed Sultan, Mohammed Taha, Saeed Al-Qumairi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Different languages have different means for structuring clauses which allow the coding of a thematically peripheral argument or adjunct as a core-object argument. The resulting constructions are known as double object or applicative constructions. The primary aim of this paper is to present a syntactic analysis of applicative constructions in Sudanese Arabic within the theoretical framework of the Minimalist Program (Chomsky, 1993, 1995), in particular, the notion of phases, in combination with Pylkkänen's proposed phrase structure and the semantics of I-applicative (2000, 2008). The overall endeavor is to provide answers to the central questions: how applicatives in Sudanese Arabic are derived? Whether applicatives in Sudanese Arabic are I-applicatives or Eapplicatives? The derivation of such constructions in Sudanese Arabic involves the coding of new argument in the argument structure of the verb. This new argument is introduced via a preposition and has a benefactive/goal interpretation. This argument is c-commanded by any internal argument. The applied argument is placed in the complement position of the head ApplI, and can undergo neither A-movement nor wh-movement. This makes Sudanese Arabic fit into the general syntactic typology of I-type applicative languages cross-linguistically and consequently promoting contrastive linguistics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-153
Number of pages11
Journal3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

syntax
coding
language
typology
semantics
linguistics
interpretation
Applicatives
Syntax

Keywords

  • Applicative construction
  • Applied argument
  • Minimalist program
  • Spoken Sudanese Arabic
  • Syntax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

The syntax of applicative constructions in spoken sudanese Arabic. / Mohamed Sultan, Fazal Mohamed; Taha, Mohammed; Al-Qumairi, Saeed.

In: 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 143-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{156fca03b0c548099f74ce98bab208de,
title = "The syntax of applicative constructions in spoken sudanese Arabic",
abstract = "Different languages have different means for structuring clauses which allow the coding of a thematically peripheral argument or adjunct as a core-object argument. The resulting constructions are known as double object or applicative constructions. The primary aim of this paper is to present a syntactic analysis of applicative constructions in Sudanese Arabic within the theoretical framework of the Minimalist Program (Chomsky, 1993, 1995), in particular, the notion of phases, in combination with Pylkk{\"a}nen's proposed phrase structure and the semantics of I-applicative (2000, 2008). The overall endeavor is to provide answers to the central questions: how applicatives in Sudanese Arabic are derived? Whether applicatives in Sudanese Arabic are I-applicatives or Eapplicatives? The derivation of such constructions in Sudanese Arabic involves the coding of new argument in the argument structure of the verb. This new argument is introduced via a preposition and has a benefactive/goal interpretation. This argument is c-commanded by any internal argument. The applied argument is placed in the complement position of the head ApplI, and can undergo neither A-movement nor wh-movement. This makes Sudanese Arabic fit into the general syntactic typology of I-type applicative languages cross-linguistically and consequently promoting contrastive linguistics.",
keywords = "Applicative construction, Applied argument, Minimalist program, Spoken Sudanese Arabic, Syntax",
author = "{Mohamed Sultan}, {Fazal Mohamed} and Mohammed Taha and Saeed Al-Qumairi",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17576/3L-2018-2402-11",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "143--153",
journal = "3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature",
issn = "0128-5157",
publisher = "Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The syntax of applicative constructions in spoken sudanese Arabic

AU - Mohamed Sultan, Fazal Mohamed

AU - Taha, Mohammed

AU - Al-Qumairi, Saeed

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Different languages have different means for structuring clauses which allow the coding of a thematically peripheral argument or adjunct as a core-object argument. The resulting constructions are known as double object or applicative constructions. The primary aim of this paper is to present a syntactic analysis of applicative constructions in Sudanese Arabic within the theoretical framework of the Minimalist Program (Chomsky, 1993, 1995), in particular, the notion of phases, in combination with Pylkkänen's proposed phrase structure and the semantics of I-applicative (2000, 2008). The overall endeavor is to provide answers to the central questions: how applicatives in Sudanese Arabic are derived? Whether applicatives in Sudanese Arabic are I-applicatives or Eapplicatives? The derivation of such constructions in Sudanese Arabic involves the coding of new argument in the argument structure of the verb. This new argument is introduced via a preposition and has a benefactive/goal interpretation. This argument is c-commanded by any internal argument. The applied argument is placed in the complement position of the head ApplI, and can undergo neither A-movement nor wh-movement. This makes Sudanese Arabic fit into the general syntactic typology of I-type applicative languages cross-linguistically and consequently promoting contrastive linguistics.

AB - Different languages have different means for structuring clauses which allow the coding of a thematically peripheral argument or adjunct as a core-object argument. The resulting constructions are known as double object or applicative constructions. The primary aim of this paper is to present a syntactic analysis of applicative constructions in Sudanese Arabic within the theoretical framework of the Minimalist Program (Chomsky, 1993, 1995), in particular, the notion of phases, in combination with Pylkkänen's proposed phrase structure and the semantics of I-applicative (2000, 2008). The overall endeavor is to provide answers to the central questions: how applicatives in Sudanese Arabic are derived? Whether applicatives in Sudanese Arabic are I-applicatives or Eapplicatives? The derivation of such constructions in Sudanese Arabic involves the coding of new argument in the argument structure of the verb. This new argument is introduced via a preposition and has a benefactive/goal interpretation. This argument is c-commanded by any internal argument. The applied argument is placed in the complement position of the head ApplI, and can undergo neither A-movement nor wh-movement. This makes Sudanese Arabic fit into the general syntactic typology of I-type applicative languages cross-linguistically and consequently promoting contrastive linguistics.

KW - Applicative construction

KW - Applied argument

KW - Minimalist program

KW - Spoken Sudanese Arabic

KW - Syntax

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049569221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049569221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17576/3L-2018-2402-11

DO - 10.17576/3L-2018-2402-11

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85049569221

VL - 24

SP - 143

EP - 153

JO - 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature

JF - 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature

SN - 0128-5157

IS - 2

ER -