The praxis of interlanguage pragmatics instruction in an EFL context

Atieh Farashaiyan, Kim Hua Tan, Paramasivam Muthusamy, Rahman Sahragard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This research investigated the implementation of inter-language pragmatics instruction which is less explored in the research literature of instructional pragmatics in EFL contexts. Specifically, it examined the extent to which instructors of private EFL institutes implement interlanguage pragmatic instruction in their classrooms in Iran. A mixed-method research design was employed in this study. Two hundred and thirty eight instructors participated in this study to collect the questionnaire data and 67 classes were involved in the observation. Questionnaire and observation checklists made up the quantitative instruments for data collection while observation field notes provided the qualitative data. The quantitative data was subjected to descriptive statistics through the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21 software and the qualitative data was analyzed based on Martinez-Flor and Uso-Juan's 6Rs instructional model. Findings from both the quantitative and qualitative data showed that Iranian EFL instructors rarely implemented and practiced the features of inter-language pragmatics in their classes in comparison with other language areas. The study suggests the inclusion of adequate pragmatic information not only in the instructors' guidebooks but also in learners' EFL textbooks and teacher training courses. The quality of EFL teaching can then be further enhanced at the higher learning institutions in EFL contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-111
Number of pages23
Journal3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

pragmatics
instruction
instructor
language
questionnaire
descriptive statistics
teacher training
Iran
research planning
textbook
social science
inclusion
Interlanguage Pragmatics
Praxis
EFL Context
Instructor
classroom
Qualitative Data
Teaching
learning

Keywords

  • EFL context
  • Interlanguage pragmatic instruction
  • Mixed-methods approach
  • Praxis
  • Private EFL institutes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

The praxis of interlanguage pragmatics instruction in an EFL context. / Farashaiyan, Atieh; Tan, Kim Hua; Muthusamy, Paramasivam; Sahragard, Rahman.

In: 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.01.2017, p. 89-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farashaiyan, Atieh ; Tan, Kim Hua ; Muthusamy, Paramasivam ; Sahragard, Rahman. / The praxis of interlanguage pragmatics instruction in an EFL context. In: 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature. 2017 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 89-111.
@article{b9af71206fd444caabf823ec5ba1dd47,
title = "The praxis of interlanguage pragmatics instruction in an EFL context",
abstract = "This research investigated the implementation of inter-language pragmatics instruction which is less explored in the research literature of instructional pragmatics in EFL contexts. Specifically, it examined the extent to which instructors of private EFL institutes implement interlanguage pragmatic instruction in their classrooms in Iran. A mixed-method research design was employed in this study. Two hundred and thirty eight instructors participated in this study to collect the questionnaire data and 67 classes were involved in the observation. Questionnaire and observation checklists made up the quantitative instruments for data collection while observation field notes provided the qualitative data. The quantitative data was subjected to descriptive statistics through the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21 software and the qualitative data was analyzed based on Martinez-Flor and Uso-Juan's 6Rs instructional model. Findings from both the quantitative and qualitative data showed that Iranian EFL instructors rarely implemented and practiced the features of inter-language pragmatics in their classes in comparison with other language areas. The study suggests the inclusion of adequate pragmatic information not only in the instructors' guidebooks but also in learners' EFL textbooks and teacher training courses. The quality of EFL teaching can then be further enhanced at the higher learning institutions in EFL contexts.",
keywords = "EFL context, Interlanguage pragmatic instruction, Mixed-methods approach, Praxis, Private EFL institutes",
author = "Atieh Farashaiyan and Tan, {Kim Hua} and Paramasivam Muthusamy and Rahman Sahragard",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17576/3L-2017-2304-08",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "89--111",
journal = "3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature",
issn = "0128-5157",
publisher = "Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The praxis of interlanguage pragmatics instruction in an EFL context

AU - Farashaiyan, Atieh

AU - Tan, Kim Hua

AU - Muthusamy, Paramasivam

AU - Sahragard, Rahman

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This research investigated the implementation of inter-language pragmatics instruction which is less explored in the research literature of instructional pragmatics in EFL contexts. Specifically, it examined the extent to which instructors of private EFL institutes implement interlanguage pragmatic instruction in their classrooms in Iran. A mixed-method research design was employed in this study. Two hundred and thirty eight instructors participated in this study to collect the questionnaire data and 67 classes were involved in the observation. Questionnaire and observation checklists made up the quantitative instruments for data collection while observation field notes provided the qualitative data. The quantitative data was subjected to descriptive statistics through the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21 software and the qualitative data was analyzed based on Martinez-Flor and Uso-Juan's 6Rs instructional model. Findings from both the quantitative and qualitative data showed that Iranian EFL instructors rarely implemented and practiced the features of inter-language pragmatics in their classes in comparison with other language areas. The study suggests the inclusion of adequate pragmatic information not only in the instructors' guidebooks but also in learners' EFL textbooks and teacher training courses. The quality of EFL teaching can then be further enhanced at the higher learning institutions in EFL contexts.

AB - This research investigated the implementation of inter-language pragmatics instruction which is less explored in the research literature of instructional pragmatics in EFL contexts. Specifically, it examined the extent to which instructors of private EFL institutes implement interlanguage pragmatic instruction in their classrooms in Iran. A mixed-method research design was employed in this study. Two hundred and thirty eight instructors participated in this study to collect the questionnaire data and 67 classes were involved in the observation. Questionnaire and observation checklists made up the quantitative instruments for data collection while observation field notes provided the qualitative data. The quantitative data was subjected to descriptive statistics through the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21 software and the qualitative data was analyzed based on Martinez-Flor and Uso-Juan's 6Rs instructional model. Findings from both the quantitative and qualitative data showed that Iranian EFL instructors rarely implemented and practiced the features of inter-language pragmatics in their classes in comparison with other language areas. The study suggests the inclusion of adequate pragmatic information not only in the instructors' guidebooks but also in learners' EFL textbooks and teacher training courses. The quality of EFL teaching can then be further enhanced at the higher learning institutions in EFL contexts.

KW - EFL context

KW - Interlanguage pragmatic instruction

KW - Mixed-methods approach

KW - Praxis

KW - Private EFL institutes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040327627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040327627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17576/3L-2017-2304-08

DO - 10.17576/3L-2017-2304-08

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040327627

VL - 23

SP - 89

EP - 111

JO - 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature

JF - 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature

SN - 0128-5157

IS - 4

ER -