The performance of different cumulus parameterization schemes in simulating the 2006/2007 southern peninsular Malaysia heavy rainfall episodes

Wan Ahmad Ardie, Khai Shen Sow, Fredolin Tangang @ Tajudin Mahmud, Abdul Ghapor Hussin, Mastura Mahmud, Ju Neng Liew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The performance of four different cumulus parameterization schemes (CPS) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for simulating three heavy rainfall episodes over the southern peninsular Malaysia during the winter monsoon of 2006/2007 were examined. The modelled rainfall was compared with the 3-hourly satellite observation and objectively scored using a verification technique called the acuity-fidelity. The technique is based on minimization of a cost function that is calculated from four parameters taking into account errors in distance, time, intensity, and missed events. All simulations were made for 72 hours for the three episodes starting at 1200 UTC 17 December 2006, 1200 UTC 24 December 2006 and 1200 UTC 11 January 2007, respectively. The four different CPSs used are the new Kain-Fritsch scheme (KF2), the Betts-Miller-Janjic scheme (BMJ), the Grell-Devenyi ensemble scheme (GD) and the older Kain-Fritsch scheme (KF1). While the BMJ scheme shows some success in the second and third episodes, it shows high location errors in the first episode, leading to high acuity errors. The GD, KF2 and KF1 schemes performed poorly, although both the BMJ and GD schemes simulated the observed drastic increase of rainfall at 2100 UTC 18 December 2006 during the first episode. Overall, the KF1 and KF2 schemes produced positive biases in terms of coverage, while the GD scheme showed persistent location bias, producing a scattered line of precipitation over the eastern coastline of peninsular Malaysia. Although the BMJ scheme has better results, its poor performance for the first episode suggests that suitability of CPS may be case dependent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-327
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Earth System Science
Volume121
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

cumulus
parameterization
rainfall
monsoon
weather
coast
winter
cost
simulation

Keywords

  • Acuity-fidelity
  • Cumulus parameterization scheme
  • Modelling
  • Rainfall
  • Southern peninsular Malaysia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{a35dfb6712b6433ba960f9be862dcf28,
title = "The performance of different cumulus parameterization schemes in simulating the 2006/2007 southern peninsular Malaysia heavy rainfall episodes",
abstract = "The performance of four different cumulus parameterization schemes (CPS) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for simulating three heavy rainfall episodes over the southern peninsular Malaysia during the winter monsoon of 2006/2007 were examined. The modelled rainfall was compared with the 3-hourly satellite observation and objectively scored using a verification technique called the acuity-fidelity. The technique is based on minimization of a cost function that is calculated from four parameters taking into account errors in distance, time, intensity, and missed events. All simulations were made for 72 hours for the three episodes starting at 1200 UTC 17 December 2006, 1200 UTC 24 December 2006 and 1200 UTC 11 January 2007, respectively. The four different CPSs used are the new Kain-Fritsch scheme (KF2), the Betts-Miller-Janjic scheme (BMJ), the Grell-Devenyi ensemble scheme (GD) and the older Kain-Fritsch scheme (KF1). While the BMJ scheme shows some success in the second and third episodes, it shows high location errors in the first episode, leading to high acuity errors. The GD, KF2 and KF1 schemes performed poorly, although both the BMJ and GD schemes simulated the observed drastic increase of rainfall at 2100 UTC 18 December 2006 during the first episode. Overall, the KF1 and KF2 schemes produced positive biases in terms of coverage, while the GD scheme showed persistent location bias, producing a scattered line of precipitation over the eastern coastline of peninsular Malaysia. Although the BMJ scheme has better results, its poor performance for the first episode suggests that suitability of CPS may be case dependent.",
keywords = "Acuity-fidelity, Cumulus parameterization scheme, Modelling, Rainfall, Southern peninsular Malaysia",
author = "Ardie, {Wan Ahmad} and Sow, {Khai Shen} and {Tangang @ Tajudin Mahmud}, Fredolin and Hussin, {Abdul Ghapor} and Mastura Mahmud and Liew, {Ju Neng}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "317--327",
journal = "Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, Earth and Planetary Sciences",
issn = "2347-4327",
publisher = "Indian Academy of Sciences",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The performance of different cumulus parameterization schemes in simulating the 2006/2007 southern peninsular Malaysia heavy rainfall episodes

AU - Ardie, Wan Ahmad

AU - Sow, Khai Shen

AU - Tangang @ Tajudin Mahmud, Fredolin

AU - Hussin, Abdul Ghapor

AU - Mahmud, Mastura

AU - Liew, Ju Neng

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - The performance of four different cumulus parameterization schemes (CPS) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for simulating three heavy rainfall episodes over the southern peninsular Malaysia during the winter monsoon of 2006/2007 were examined. The modelled rainfall was compared with the 3-hourly satellite observation and objectively scored using a verification technique called the acuity-fidelity. The technique is based on minimization of a cost function that is calculated from four parameters taking into account errors in distance, time, intensity, and missed events. All simulations were made for 72 hours for the three episodes starting at 1200 UTC 17 December 2006, 1200 UTC 24 December 2006 and 1200 UTC 11 January 2007, respectively. The four different CPSs used are the new Kain-Fritsch scheme (KF2), the Betts-Miller-Janjic scheme (BMJ), the Grell-Devenyi ensemble scheme (GD) and the older Kain-Fritsch scheme (KF1). While the BMJ scheme shows some success in the second and third episodes, it shows high location errors in the first episode, leading to high acuity errors. The GD, KF2 and KF1 schemes performed poorly, although both the BMJ and GD schemes simulated the observed drastic increase of rainfall at 2100 UTC 18 December 2006 during the first episode. Overall, the KF1 and KF2 schemes produced positive biases in terms of coverage, while the GD scheme showed persistent location bias, producing a scattered line of precipitation over the eastern coastline of peninsular Malaysia. Although the BMJ scheme has better results, its poor performance for the first episode suggests that suitability of CPS may be case dependent.

AB - The performance of four different cumulus parameterization schemes (CPS) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for simulating three heavy rainfall episodes over the southern peninsular Malaysia during the winter monsoon of 2006/2007 were examined. The modelled rainfall was compared with the 3-hourly satellite observation and objectively scored using a verification technique called the acuity-fidelity. The technique is based on minimization of a cost function that is calculated from four parameters taking into account errors in distance, time, intensity, and missed events. All simulations were made for 72 hours for the three episodes starting at 1200 UTC 17 December 2006, 1200 UTC 24 December 2006 and 1200 UTC 11 January 2007, respectively. The four different CPSs used are the new Kain-Fritsch scheme (KF2), the Betts-Miller-Janjic scheme (BMJ), the Grell-Devenyi ensemble scheme (GD) and the older Kain-Fritsch scheme (KF1). While the BMJ scheme shows some success in the second and third episodes, it shows high location errors in the first episode, leading to high acuity errors. The GD, KF2 and KF1 schemes performed poorly, although both the BMJ and GD schemes simulated the observed drastic increase of rainfall at 2100 UTC 18 December 2006 during the first episode. Overall, the KF1 and KF2 schemes produced positive biases in terms of coverage, while the GD scheme showed persistent location bias, producing a scattered line of precipitation over the eastern coastline of peninsular Malaysia. Although the BMJ scheme has better results, its poor performance for the first episode suggests that suitability of CPS may be case dependent.

KW - Acuity-fidelity

KW - Cumulus parameterization scheme

KW - Modelling

KW - Rainfall

KW - Southern peninsular Malaysia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860369522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860369522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 121

SP - 317

EP - 327

JO - Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, Earth and Planetary Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, Earth and Planetary Sciences

SN - 2347-4327

IS - 2

ER -