The effects of written corrective feedback using wikis among ESL learners

Maryam Jazayeri Gharehbagh, Siti Hamin Stapa, Saadiyah Darus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Wikis are being used more and more frequently in language learning situations. Their ease of access and usability has made them a popular choice amongst language teachers; especially in the teaching of writing. However, the full potential of wikis outside collaborative writing has yet to be explored. This study aims to focus on the potentials of providing feedback to written work using the platform of wikis. In this study, 14 students were asked to provide feedback and comments on their peers’ essays on a wiki platform using a correction checklist provided to them. These students were first asked to write an essay, upload it onto the wiki platform, and then finally comment on the written texts of their peers; for a total of nine times. At the end of the study, the students’ pre and post-test scores were compared to see whether their written accuracy had improved. A paired-sample t-test was used to analyse the students’ pre and post-test scores and the results showed a significant improvement in Jacob’s (1981) ESL components of content, organization, language use and vocabulary; however, the study did not yield the same results for the students’ punctuation use. In being provided comments by peers and their teacher through the platform of wikis, the students’ enthusiasm increased when put through the feedback; therefore, their focus heightened on writing a more accurate version of their previous essay. This in turn, increased the overall quality of their final essay.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
Journal3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

student
language
learning situation
teacher
Wikis
Written Corrective Feedback
vocabulary
organization
Teaching
Peers
Test Scores
Usability
Vocabulary
Collaborative Writing
Punctuation
Language Use
Enthusiasm
Language Acquisition
Teaching of Writing
Language Teachers

Keywords

  • Correction Checklist
  • Language Components
  • Wikis
  • Written accuracy
  • Written corrective feedback

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

The effects of written corrective feedback using wikis among ESL learners. / Gharehbagh, Maryam Jazayeri; Stapa, Siti Hamin; Darus, Saadiyah.

In: 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{27a90831d0df49efa95c95016b21210a,
title = "The effects of written corrective feedback using wikis among ESL learners",
abstract = "Wikis are being used more and more frequently in language learning situations. Their ease of access and usability has made them a popular choice amongst language teachers; especially in the teaching of writing. However, the full potential of wikis outside collaborative writing has yet to be explored. This study aims to focus on the potentials of providing feedback to written work using the platform of wikis. In this study, 14 students were asked to provide feedback and comments on their peers’ essays on a wiki platform using a correction checklist provided to them. These students were first asked to write an essay, upload it onto the wiki platform, and then finally comment on the written texts of their peers; for a total of nine times. At the end of the study, the students’ pre and post-test scores were compared to see whether their written accuracy had improved. A paired-sample t-test was used to analyse the students’ pre and post-test scores and the results showed a significant improvement in Jacob’s (1981) ESL components of content, organization, language use and vocabulary; however, the study did not yield the same results for the students’ punctuation use. In being provided comments by peers and their teacher through the platform of wikis, the students’ enthusiasm increased when put through the feedback; therefore, their focus heightened on writing a more accurate version of their previous essay. This in turn, increased the overall quality of their final essay.",
keywords = "Correction Checklist, Language Components, Wikis, Written accuracy, Written corrective feedback",
author = "Gharehbagh, {Maryam Jazayeri} and Stapa, {Siti Hamin} and Saadiyah Darus",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17576/3L-2019-2501-04",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature",
issn = "0128-5157",
publisher = "Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of written corrective feedback using wikis among ESL learners

AU - Gharehbagh, Maryam Jazayeri

AU - Stapa, Siti Hamin

AU - Darus, Saadiyah

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Wikis are being used more and more frequently in language learning situations. Their ease of access and usability has made them a popular choice amongst language teachers; especially in the teaching of writing. However, the full potential of wikis outside collaborative writing has yet to be explored. This study aims to focus on the potentials of providing feedback to written work using the platform of wikis. In this study, 14 students were asked to provide feedback and comments on their peers’ essays on a wiki platform using a correction checklist provided to them. These students were first asked to write an essay, upload it onto the wiki platform, and then finally comment on the written texts of their peers; for a total of nine times. At the end of the study, the students’ pre and post-test scores were compared to see whether their written accuracy had improved. A paired-sample t-test was used to analyse the students’ pre and post-test scores and the results showed a significant improvement in Jacob’s (1981) ESL components of content, organization, language use and vocabulary; however, the study did not yield the same results for the students’ punctuation use. In being provided comments by peers and their teacher through the platform of wikis, the students’ enthusiasm increased when put through the feedback; therefore, their focus heightened on writing a more accurate version of their previous essay. This in turn, increased the overall quality of their final essay.

AB - Wikis are being used more and more frequently in language learning situations. Their ease of access and usability has made them a popular choice amongst language teachers; especially in the teaching of writing. However, the full potential of wikis outside collaborative writing has yet to be explored. This study aims to focus on the potentials of providing feedback to written work using the platform of wikis. In this study, 14 students were asked to provide feedback and comments on their peers’ essays on a wiki platform using a correction checklist provided to them. These students were first asked to write an essay, upload it onto the wiki platform, and then finally comment on the written texts of their peers; for a total of nine times. At the end of the study, the students’ pre and post-test scores were compared to see whether their written accuracy had improved. A paired-sample t-test was used to analyse the students’ pre and post-test scores and the results showed a significant improvement in Jacob’s (1981) ESL components of content, organization, language use and vocabulary; however, the study did not yield the same results for the students’ punctuation use. In being provided comments by peers and their teacher through the platform of wikis, the students’ enthusiasm increased when put through the feedback; therefore, their focus heightened on writing a more accurate version of their previous essay. This in turn, increased the overall quality of their final essay.

KW - Correction Checklist

KW - Language Components

KW - Wikis

KW - Written accuracy

KW - Written corrective feedback

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064354911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064354911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17576/3L-2019-2501-04

DO - 10.17576/3L-2019-2501-04

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature

JF - 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature

SN - 0128-5157

IS - 1

ER -