The effect of motorcycle helmet type, components and fixation status on facial injury in Klang Valley, Malaysia

A case control study

Roszalina Ramli, Jennifer Oxley, Peter Hillard, Ahmad F. Mohd Sadullah, Roderick McClure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of helmets in reducing the risk of severe head injury in motorcyclists who were involved in a crash is well established. There is limited evidence however, regarding the extent to which helmets protect riders from facial injuries. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of helmet type, components and fixation status on the risk of facial injuries among Malaysian motorcyclists.Method: 755 injured motorcyclists were recruited over a 12-month period in 2010-2011 in southern Klang Valley, Malaysia in this case control study. Of the 755 injured motorcyclists, 391participants (51.8%) sustained facial injuries (cases) while 364 (48.2%) participants were without facial injury (control). The outcomes of interest were facial injury and location of facial injury (i.e. upper, middle and lower face injuries). A binary logistic regression was conducted to examine the association between helmet characteristics and the outcomes, taking into account potential confounders such as age, riding position, alcohol and illicit substance use, type of colliding vehicle and type of collision. Helmet fixation was defined as the position of the helmet during the crash whether it was still secured on the head or had been dislodged.Results: Helmet fixation was shown to have a greater effect on facial injury outcome than helmet type. Increased odds of adverse outcome was observed for the non-fixed helmet compared to the fixed helmet with adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.10 (95% CI 1.41- 3.13) for facial injury; AOR = 6.64 (95% CI 3.71-11.91) for upper face injury; AOR = 5.36 (95% CI 3.05-9.44) for middle face injury; and AOR = 2.00 (95% CI 1.22-3.26) for lower face injury. Motorcyclists with visor damage were shown with AOR = 5.48 (95% CI 1.46-20.57) to have facial injuries compared to those with an undamaged visor.Conclusions: A helmet of any type that is properly worn and remains fixed on the head throughout a crash will provide some form of protection against facial injury. Visor damage is a significant contributing factor for facial injury. These findings are discussed with reference to implications for policy and initiatives addressing helmet use and wearing behaviors.

Original languageEnglish
Article number17
JournalBMC Emergency Medicine
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Aug 2014

Fingerprint

Facial Injuries
Motorcycles
Head Protective Devices
Malaysia
Case-Control Studies
Odds Ratio
Wounds and Injuries
Head
Craniocerebral Trauma

Keywords

  • Facial injury
  • Helmet component
  • Helmet fixation
  • Helmet type
  • Klang Valley
  • Malaysia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

The effect of motorcycle helmet type, components and fixation status on facial injury in Klang Valley, Malaysia : A case control study. / Ramli, Roszalina; Oxley, Jennifer; Hillard, Peter; Mohd Sadullah, Ahmad F.; McClure, Roderick.

In: BMC Emergency Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 1, 17, 03.08.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramli, Roszalina ; Oxley, Jennifer ; Hillard, Peter ; Mohd Sadullah, Ahmad F. ; McClure, Roderick. / The effect of motorcycle helmet type, components and fixation status on facial injury in Klang Valley, Malaysia : A case control study. In: BMC Emergency Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. 1.
@article{6a6d8aad2e404a9f99f62a0927a2a4c9,
title = "The effect of motorcycle helmet type, components and fixation status on facial injury in Klang Valley, Malaysia: A case control study",
abstract = "Background: The effectiveness of helmets in reducing the risk of severe head injury in motorcyclists who were involved in a crash is well established. There is limited evidence however, regarding the extent to which helmets protect riders from facial injuries. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of helmet type, components and fixation status on the risk of facial injuries among Malaysian motorcyclists.Method: 755 injured motorcyclists were recruited over a 12-month period in 2010-2011 in southern Klang Valley, Malaysia in this case control study. Of the 755 injured motorcyclists, 391participants (51.8{\%}) sustained facial injuries (cases) while 364 (48.2{\%}) participants were without facial injury (control). The outcomes of interest were facial injury and location of facial injury (i.e. upper, middle and lower face injuries). A binary logistic regression was conducted to examine the association between helmet characteristics and the outcomes, taking into account potential confounders such as age, riding position, alcohol and illicit substance use, type of colliding vehicle and type of collision. Helmet fixation was defined as the position of the helmet during the crash whether it was still secured on the head or had been dislodged.Results: Helmet fixation was shown to have a greater effect on facial injury outcome than helmet type. Increased odds of adverse outcome was observed for the non-fixed helmet compared to the fixed helmet with adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.10 (95{\%} CI 1.41- 3.13) for facial injury; AOR = 6.64 (95{\%} CI 3.71-11.91) for upper face injury; AOR = 5.36 (95{\%} CI 3.05-9.44) for middle face injury; and AOR = 2.00 (95{\%} CI 1.22-3.26) for lower face injury. Motorcyclists with visor damage were shown with AOR = 5.48 (95{\%} CI 1.46-20.57) to have facial injuries compared to those with an undamaged visor.Conclusions: A helmet of any type that is properly worn and remains fixed on the head throughout a crash will provide some form of protection against facial injury. Visor damage is a significant contributing factor for facial injury. These findings are discussed with reference to implications for policy and initiatives addressing helmet use and wearing behaviors.",
keywords = "Facial injury, Helmet component, Helmet fixation, Helmet type, Klang Valley, Malaysia",
author = "Roszalina Ramli and Jennifer Oxley and Peter Hillard and {Mohd Sadullah}, {Ahmad F.} and Roderick McClure",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1186/1471-227X-14-17",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "BMC Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1471-227X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of motorcycle helmet type, components and fixation status on facial injury in Klang Valley, Malaysia

T2 - A case control study

AU - Ramli, Roszalina

AU - Oxley, Jennifer

AU - Hillard, Peter

AU - Mohd Sadullah, Ahmad F.

AU - McClure, Roderick

PY - 2014/8/3

Y1 - 2014/8/3

N2 - Background: The effectiveness of helmets in reducing the risk of severe head injury in motorcyclists who were involved in a crash is well established. There is limited evidence however, regarding the extent to which helmets protect riders from facial injuries. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of helmet type, components and fixation status on the risk of facial injuries among Malaysian motorcyclists.Method: 755 injured motorcyclists were recruited over a 12-month period in 2010-2011 in southern Klang Valley, Malaysia in this case control study. Of the 755 injured motorcyclists, 391participants (51.8%) sustained facial injuries (cases) while 364 (48.2%) participants were without facial injury (control). The outcomes of interest were facial injury and location of facial injury (i.e. upper, middle and lower face injuries). A binary logistic regression was conducted to examine the association between helmet characteristics and the outcomes, taking into account potential confounders such as age, riding position, alcohol and illicit substance use, type of colliding vehicle and type of collision. Helmet fixation was defined as the position of the helmet during the crash whether it was still secured on the head or had been dislodged.Results: Helmet fixation was shown to have a greater effect on facial injury outcome than helmet type. Increased odds of adverse outcome was observed for the non-fixed helmet compared to the fixed helmet with adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.10 (95% CI 1.41- 3.13) for facial injury; AOR = 6.64 (95% CI 3.71-11.91) for upper face injury; AOR = 5.36 (95% CI 3.05-9.44) for middle face injury; and AOR = 2.00 (95% CI 1.22-3.26) for lower face injury. Motorcyclists with visor damage were shown with AOR = 5.48 (95% CI 1.46-20.57) to have facial injuries compared to those with an undamaged visor.Conclusions: A helmet of any type that is properly worn and remains fixed on the head throughout a crash will provide some form of protection against facial injury. Visor damage is a significant contributing factor for facial injury. These findings are discussed with reference to implications for policy and initiatives addressing helmet use and wearing behaviors.

AB - Background: The effectiveness of helmets in reducing the risk of severe head injury in motorcyclists who were involved in a crash is well established. There is limited evidence however, regarding the extent to which helmets protect riders from facial injuries. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of helmet type, components and fixation status on the risk of facial injuries among Malaysian motorcyclists.Method: 755 injured motorcyclists were recruited over a 12-month period in 2010-2011 in southern Klang Valley, Malaysia in this case control study. Of the 755 injured motorcyclists, 391participants (51.8%) sustained facial injuries (cases) while 364 (48.2%) participants were without facial injury (control). The outcomes of interest were facial injury and location of facial injury (i.e. upper, middle and lower face injuries). A binary logistic regression was conducted to examine the association between helmet characteristics and the outcomes, taking into account potential confounders such as age, riding position, alcohol and illicit substance use, type of colliding vehicle and type of collision. Helmet fixation was defined as the position of the helmet during the crash whether it was still secured on the head or had been dislodged.Results: Helmet fixation was shown to have a greater effect on facial injury outcome than helmet type. Increased odds of adverse outcome was observed for the non-fixed helmet compared to the fixed helmet with adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.10 (95% CI 1.41- 3.13) for facial injury; AOR = 6.64 (95% CI 3.71-11.91) for upper face injury; AOR = 5.36 (95% CI 3.05-9.44) for middle face injury; and AOR = 2.00 (95% CI 1.22-3.26) for lower face injury. Motorcyclists with visor damage were shown with AOR = 5.48 (95% CI 1.46-20.57) to have facial injuries compared to those with an undamaged visor.Conclusions: A helmet of any type that is properly worn and remains fixed on the head throughout a crash will provide some form of protection against facial injury. Visor damage is a significant contributing factor for facial injury. These findings are discussed with reference to implications for policy and initiatives addressing helmet use and wearing behaviors.

KW - Facial injury

KW - Helmet component

KW - Helmet fixation

KW - Helmet type

KW - Klang Valley

KW - Malaysia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905821687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905821687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-227X-14-17

DO - 10.1186/1471-227X-14-17

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - BMC Emergency Medicine

JF - BMC Emergency Medicine

SN - 1471-227X

IS - 1

M1 - 17

ER -