Surveillance evaluation of the National Cancer Registry in Sabah, Malaysia

Saffree Mohammad Jeffree, Omar Mihat, Khamisah Awang Lukman, Mohd Yusof Ibrahim, Fadzilah Kamaludin, Mohd Rohaizat Hassan, Nirmal Kaur, Than Myint

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Cancer is the fourth leading cause of death in Sabah Malaysia with a reported age-standardized incidence rate was 104.9 per 100,000 in 2007. The incidence rate depends on non-mandatory notification in the registry. Under-reporting will provide the false picture of cancer control program effectiveness. The present study was to evaluate the performance of the cancer registry system in terms of representativeness, data quality, simplicity, acceptability and timeliness and provision of recommendations for improvement. Materials and Methods: The evaluation was conducted among key informants in the National Cancer Registry (NCR) and reporting facilities from Feb-May 2012 and was based on US CDC guidelines. Representativeness was assessed by matching cancer case in the Health Information System (HIS) and state pathology records with those in NCR. Data quality was measured through case finding and re-abstracting of medical records by independent auditors. The re-abstracting portion comprised 15 data items. Self-administered questionnaires were used to assess simplicity and acceptability. Timeliness was measured from date of diagnosis to date of notification received and data dissemination. Results: Of 4613 cancer cases reported in HIS, 83.3% were matched with cancer registry. In the state pathology centre, 99.8% was notified to registry. Duplication of notification was 3%. Data completeness calculated for 104 samples was 63.4%. Registrars perceived simplicity in coding diagnosis as moderate. Notification process was moderately acceptable. Median duration of interval 1 was 5.7 months. Conclusions: The performances of registry's attributes are fairly positive in terms of simplicity, case reporting sensitivity, and predictive value positive. It is moderately acceptable, data completeness and inflexible. The usefulness of registry is the area of concern to achieve registry objectives. Timeliness of reporting is within international standard, whereas timeliness to data dissemination was longer up to 4 years. Integration between existing HIS and national registration department will improve data quality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3123-3129
Number of pages7
JournalAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Volume17
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Malaysia
Registries
Health Information Systems
Neoplasms
Pathology
Incidence
Program Evaluation
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Medical Records
Cause of Death
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Acceptability
  • Cancer registry
  • Data quality
  • Representativeness
  • Simplicity
  • Timelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine(all)
  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Jeffree, S. M., Mihat, O., Lukman, K. A., Ibrahim, M. Y., Kamaludin, F., Hassan, M. R., ... Myint, T. (2016). Surveillance evaluation of the National Cancer Registry in Sabah, Malaysia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 17(7), 3123-3129.

Surveillance evaluation of the National Cancer Registry in Sabah, Malaysia. / Jeffree, Saffree Mohammad; Mihat, Omar; Lukman, Khamisah Awang; Ibrahim, Mohd Yusof; Kamaludin, Fadzilah; Hassan, Mohd Rohaizat; Kaur, Nirmal; Myint, Than.

In: Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol. 17, No. 7, 2016, p. 3123-3129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jeffree, SM, Mihat, O, Lukman, KA, Ibrahim, MY, Kamaludin, F, Hassan, MR, Kaur, N & Myint, T 2016, 'Surveillance evaluation of the National Cancer Registry in Sabah, Malaysia', Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 3123-3129.
Jeffree SM, Mihat O, Lukman KA, Ibrahim MY, Kamaludin F, Hassan MR et al. Surveillance evaluation of the National Cancer Registry in Sabah, Malaysia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2016;17(7):3123-3129.
Jeffree, Saffree Mohammad ; Mihat, Omar ; Lukman, Khamisah Awang ; Ibrahim, Mohd Yusof ; Kamaludin, Fadzilah ; Hassan, Mohd Rohaizat ; Kaur, Nirmal ; Myint, Than. / Surveillance evaluation of the National Cancer Registry in Sabah, Malaysia. In: Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2016 ; Vol. 17, No. 7. pp. 3123-3129.
@article{7db1f897921448c69f91b28bcd6ca571,
title = "Surveillance evaluation of the National Cancer Registry in Sabah, Malaysia",
abstract = "Background: Cancer is the fourth leading cause of death in Sabah Malaysia with a reported age-standardized incidence rate was 104.9 per 100,000 in 2007. The incidence rate depends on non-mandatory notification in the registry. Under-reporting will provide the false picture of cancer control program effectiveness. The present study was to evaluate the performance of the cancer registry system in terms of representativeness, data quality, simplicity, acceptability and timeliness and provision of recommendations for improvement. Materials and Methods: The evaluation was conducted among key informants in the National Cancer Registry (NCR) and reporting facilities from Feb-May 2012 and was based on US CDC guidelines. Representativeness was assessed by matching cancer case in the Health Information System (HIS) and state pathology records with those in NCR. Data quality was measured through case finding and re-abstracting of medical records by independent auditors. The re-abstracting portion comprised 15 data items. Self-administered questionnaires were used to assess simplicity and acceptability. Timeliness was measured from date of diagnosis to date of notification received and data dissemination. Results: Of 4613 cancer cases reported in HIS, 83.3{\%} were matched with cancer registry. In the state pathology centre, 99.8{\%} was notified to registry. Duplication of notification was 3{\%}. Data completeness calculated for 104 samples was 63.4{\%}. Registrars perceived simplicity in coding diagnosis as moderate. Notification process was moderately acceptable. Median duration of interval 1 was 5.7 months. Conclusions: The performances of registry's attributes are fairly positive in terms of simplicity, case reporting sensitivity, and predictive value positive. It is moderately acceptable, data completeness and inflexible. The usefulness of registry is the area of concern to achieve registry objectives. Timeliness of reporting is within international standard, whereas timeliness to data dissemination was longer up to 4 years. Integration between existing HIS and national registration department will improve data quality.",
keywords = "Acceptability, Cancer registry, Data quality, Representativeness, Simplicity, Timelines",
author = "Jeffree, {Saffree Mohammad} and Omar Mihat and Lukman, {Khamisah Awang} and Ibrahim, {Mohd Yusof} and Fadzilah Kamaludin and Hassan, {Mohd Rohaizat} and Nirmal Kaur and Than Myint",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "3123--3129",
journal = "Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention",
issn = "1513-7368",
publisher = "Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surveillance evaluation of the National Cancer Registry in Sabah, Malaysia

AU - Jeffree, Saffree Mohammad

AU - Mihat, Omar

AU - Lukman, Khamisah Awang

AU - Ibrahim, Mohd Yusof

AU - Kamaludin, Fadzilah

AU - Hassan, Mohd Rohaizat

AU - Kaur, Nirmal

AU - Myint, Than

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: Cancer is the fourth leading cause of death in Sabah Malaysia with a reported age-standardized incidence rate was 104.9 per 100,000 in 2007. The incidence rate depends on non-mandatory notification in the registry. Under-reporting will provide the false picture of cancer control program effectiveness. The present study was to evaluate the performance of the cancer registry system in terms of representativeness, data quality, simplicity, acceptability and timeliness and provision of recommendations for improvement. Materials and Methods: The evaluation was conducted among key informants in the National Cancer Registry (NCR) and reporting facilities from Feb-May 2012 and was based on US CDC guidelines. Representativeness was assessed by matching cancer case in the Health Information System (HIS) and state pathology records with those in NCR. Data quality was measured through case finding and re-abstracting of medical records by independent auditors. The re-abstracting portion comprised 15 data items. Self-administered questionnaires were used to assess simplicity and acceptability. Timeliness was measured from date of diagnosis to date of notification received and data dissemination. Results: Of 4613 cancer cases reported in HIS, 83.3% were matched with cancer registry. In the state pathology centre, 99.8% was notified to registry. Duplication of notification was 3%. Data completeness calculated for 104 samples was 63.4%. Registrars perceived simplicity in coding diagnosis as moderate. Notification process was moderately acceptable. Median duration of interval 1 was 5.7 months. Conclusions: The performances of registry's attributes are fairly positive in terms of simplicity, case reporting sensitivity, and predictive value positive. It is moderately acceptable, data completeness and inflexible. The usefulness of registry is the area of concern to achieve registry objectives. Timeliness of reporting is within international standard, whereas timeliness to data dissemination was longer up to 4 years. Integration between existing HIS and national registration department will improve data quality.

AB - Background: Cancer is the fourth leading cause of death in Sabah Malaysia with a reported age-standardized incidence rate was 104.9 per 100,000 in 2007. The incidence rate depends on non-mandatory notification in the registry. Under-reporting will provide the false picture of cancer control program effectiveness. The present study was to evaluate the performance of the cancer registry system in terms of representativeness, data quality, simplicity, acceptability and timeliness and provision of recommendations for improvement. Materials and Methods: The evaluation was conducted among key informants in the National Cancer Registry (NCR) and reporting facilities from Feb-May 2012 and was based on US CDC guidelines. Representativeness was assessed by matching cancer case in the Health Information System (HIS) and state pathology records with those in NCR. Data quality was measured through case finding and re-abstracting of medical records by independent auditors. The re-abstracting portion comprised 15 data items. Self-administered questionnaires were used to assess simplicity and acceptability. Timeliness was measured from date of diagnosis to date of notification received and data dissemination. Results: Of 4613 cancer cases reported in HIS, 83.3% were matched with cancer registry. In the state pathology centre, 99.8% was notified to registry. Duplication of notification was 3%. Data completeness calculated for 104 samples was 63.4%. Registrars perceived simplicity in coding diagnosis as moderate. Notification process was moderately acceptable. Median duration of interval 1 was 5.7 months. Conclusions: The performances of registry's attributes are fairly positive in terms of simplicity, case reporting sensitivity, and predictive value positive. It is moderately acceptable, data completeness and inflexible. The usefulness of registry is the area of concern to achieve registry objectives. Timeliness of reporting is within international standard, whereas timeliness to data dissemination was longer up to 4 years. Integration between existing HIS and national registration department will improve data quality.

KW - Acceptability

KW - Cancer registry

KW - Data quality

KW - Representativeness

KW - Simplicity

KW - Timelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983371716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983371716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 27509940

AN - SCOPUS:84983371716

VL - 17

SP - 3123

EP - 3129

JO - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

JF - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

SN - 1513-7368

IS - 7

ER -