Sensory analysis of lipstick

K. C S Yap, Aminah Abdullah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Synopsis Sensory analysis of lipstick product by trained panellists started with recruiting female panels who are lipstick users, in good health condition and willing to be a part of sensory members. This group of people was further scrutinized with duo-trio method using commercial lipstick samples that are commonly used among them. About 40% of the 15 panels recruited were unable to differentiate the lipstick samples they usually use better than chance. The balance of nine panels that were corrected at least with 65% across all trials in panels screening process was formed a working group to develop sensory languages as a means of describing product similarities and differences and a scoring system. Five sessions with each session took about 90 min were carried out using 10 types of lipsticks with different waxes mixture ratio in the formulation together with six commercial lipsticks that are the most common to the panels. First session was focus on listing out the panels' perception towards the characteristic of the lipstick samples after normal application on their lips. Second session was focus on the refining and categorizing the responses gathered from the first session and translated into sensory attributes with its definition. Third session was focus on the scoring system. Fourth and fifth sessions were repetition of the third session to ensure consistency. In a collective effort of the panels, sensory attributes developed for lipstick were Spreadability, Off flavour, Hardness, Smoothness, Moist, Not messy, Glossy and Greasy. Analysis of variance was able to provide ample evidence on gauging the panel performance. A proper panels selecting and training was able to produce a reliable and sensitive trained panel for evaluating the product based on the procedures being trained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-250
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Cosmetic Science
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Gaging
Waxes
Flavors
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Refining
Screening
Hardness
Health
Lip
Analysis of Variance
Language
Sensory analysis

Keywords

  • ANOVA
  • lipstick
  • panel performance
  • sensory
  • sensory languages

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Colloid and Surface Chemistry
  • Ageing
  • Drug Discovery
  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Sensory analysis of lipstick. / Yap, K. C S; Abdullah, Aminah.

In: International Journal of Cosmetic Science, Vol. 33, No. 3, 06.2011, p. 245-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yap, K. C S ; Abdullah, Aminah. / Sensory analysis of lipstick. In: International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2011 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 245-250.
@article{d8d7999909314b21b9044b64bc9e29a2,
title = "Sensory analysis of lipstick",
abstract = "Synopsis Sensory analysis of lipstick product by trained panellists started with recruiting female panels who are lipstick users, in good health condition and willing to be a part of sensory members. This group of people was further scrutinized with duo-trio method using commercial lipstick samples that are commonly used among them. About 40{\%} of the 15 panels recruited were unable to differentiate the lipstick samples they usually use better than chance. The balance of nine panels that were corrected at least with 65{\%} across all trials in panels screening process was formed a working group to develop sensory languages as a means of describing product similarities and differences and a scoring system. Five sessions with each session took about 90 min were carried out using 10 types of lipsticks with different waxes mixture ratio in the formulation together with six commercial lipsticks that are the most common to the panels. First session was focus on listing out the panels' perception towards the characteristic of the lipstick samples after normal application on their lips. Second session was focus on the refining and categorizing the responses gathered from the first session and translated into sensory attributes with its definition. Third session was focus on the scoring system. Fourth and fifth sessions were repetition of the third session to ensure consistency. In a collective effort of the panels, sensory attributes developed for lipstick were Spreadability, Off flavour, Hardness, Smoothness, Moist, Not messy, Glossy and Greasy. Analysis of variance was able to provide ample evidence on gauging the panel performance. A proper panels selecting and training was able to produce a reliable and sensitive trained panel for evaluating the product based on the procedures being trained.",
keywords = "ANOVA, lipstick, panel performance, sensory, sensory languages",
author = "Yap, {K. C S} and Aminah Abdullah",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00621.x",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "245--250",
journal = "International Journal of Cosmetic Science",
issn = "0142-5463",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensory analysis of lipstick

AU - Yap, K. C S

AU - Abdullah, Aminah

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Synopsis Sensory analysis of lipstick product by trained panellists started with recruiting female panels who are lipstick users, in good health condition and willing to be a part of sensory members. This group of people was further scrutinized with duo-trio method using commercial lipstick samples that are commonly used among them. About 40% of the 15 panels recruited were unable to differentiate the lipstick samples they usually use better than chance. The balance of nine panels that were corrected at least with 65% across all trials in panels screening process was formed a working group to develop sensory languages as a means of describing product similarities and differences and a scoring system. Five sessions with each session took about 90 min were carried out using 10 types of lipsticks with different waxes mixture ratio in the formulation together with six commercial lipsticks that are the most common to the panels. First session was focus on listing out the panels' perception towards the characteristic of the lipstick samples after normal application on their lips. Second session was focus on the refining and categorizing the responses gathered from the first session and translated into sensory attributes with its definition. Third session was focus on the scoring system. Fourth and fifth sessions were repetition of the third session to ensure consistency. In a collective effort of the panels, sensory attributes developed for lipstick were Spreadability, Off flavour, Hardness, Smoothness, Moist, Not messy, Glossy and Greasy. Analysis of variance was able to provide ample evidence on gauging the panel performance. A proper panels selecting and training was able to produce a reliable and sensitive trained panel for evaluating the product based on the procedures being trained.

AB - Synopsis Sensory analysis of lipstick product by trained panellists started with recruiting female panels who are lipstick users, in good health condition and willing to be a part of sensory members. This group of people was further scrutinized with duo-trio method using commercial lipstick samples that are commonly used among them. About 40% of the 15 panels recruited were unable to differentiate the lipstick samples they usually use better than chance. The balance of nine panels that were corrected at least with 65% across all trials in panels screening process was formed a working group to develop sensory languages as a means of describing product similarities and differences and a scoring system. Five sessions with each session took about 90 min were carried out using 10 types of lipsticks with different waxes mixture ratio in the formulation together with six commercial lipsticks that are the most common to the panels. First session was focus on listing out the panels' perception towards the characteristic of the lipstick samples after normal application on their lips. Second session was focus on the refining and categorizing the responses gathered from the first session and translated into sensory attributes with its definition. Third session was focus on the scoring system. Fourth and fifth sessions were repetition of the third session to ensure consistency. In a collective effort of the panels, sensory attributes developed for lipstick were Spreadability, Off flavour, Hardness, Smoothness, Moist, Not messy, Glossy and Greasy. Analysis of variance was able to provide ample evidence on gauging the panel performance. A proper panels selecting and training was able to produce a reliable and sensitive trained panel for evaluating the product based on the procedures being trained.

KW - ANOVA

KW - lipstick

KW - panel performance

KW - sensory

KW - sensory languages

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955785246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955785246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00621.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00621.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21272038

AN - SCOPUS:79955785246

VL - 33

SP - 245

EP - 250

JO - International Journal of Cosmetic Science

JF - International Journal of Cosmetic Science

SN - 0142-5463

IS - 3

ER -