Regulating access to genetic resources and the sharing of benefit through the Sarawak access benefit-sharing legislation

Rohaida Nordin, Kamal Halili Hassan, Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol, Rohimi Shapiee, Faridah Jalil, M. A. Witbrodt, M. S. Hassan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Currently, Malaysia does not have specific national legislation to regulate access to its genetic resources and ensure equitable sharing of benefits derived from their commercialisation (ABS legislation). However, the States of Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia have enacted their ABS legislations to be implemented within their States territories. This research will examine how Sarawak provides for mechanism for resolving conflicting interests in genetic resources. For purposes of this study, this research will evaluate Sarawak ABS legislation, namely, the Sarawak Biodiversity Centre Ordinance in 1997 and Sarawak Biodiversity Regulation in 2004. The principal issues to be considered are the manner in which the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is reflected in the legislative enactments; the degree to which the CBD was implemented in the legislative enactments and the degree of effective consultation and participation in the process of formulating the respective legislative acts. The particular questions to be answered are: to what extent the ABS legislation in Sarawak has conformed to ABS requirements in the CBD; how have the legislative acts been implemented by the respective authorities and what are the strengths and limitations of the legislative acts? For purposes of this evaluation, comparison will be made between the situation in Sarawak and in the Philippines, specifically with regards to Philippines Executive Order 247. It is the conclusion that Sarawak has not via its ABS legislation; conform to ABS requirements as reflected in the CBD, particularly in regards to the adequate protection of the interests of the indigenous peoples. The basic foundation of ABS legal framework in Sarawak is not compatible with Philippines and unless this is improved, Sarawak will not have an adequate legal infrastructure to support its involvement in future biotechnology-related activities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-193
Number of pages9
JournalResearch Journal of Applied Sciences
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

biological diversity
Biodiversity
resources
Philippines
Malaysia
requirements
biotechnology
commercialization
Biotechnology
evaluation

Keywords

  • ABS legislation
  • Access and benefit-sharing
  • Bioprospecting
  • Genetic resources
  • Indigenous peoples

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{24f373144eae4503bc29ca0489af9def,
title = "Regulating access to genetic resources and the sharing of benefit through the Sarawak access benefit-sharing legislation",
abstract = "Currently, Malaysia does not have specific national legislation to regulate access to its genetic resources and ensure equitable sharing of benefits derived from their commercialisation (ABS legislation). However, the States of Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia have enacted their ABS legislations to be implemented within their States territories. This research will examine how Sarawak provides for mechanism for resolving conflicting interests in genetic resources. For purposes of this study, this research will evaluate Sarawak ABS legislation, namely, the Sarawak Biodiversity Centre Ordinance in 1997 and Sarawak Biodiversity Regulation in 2004. The principal issues to be considered are the manner in which the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is reflected in the legislative enactments; the degree to which the CBD was implemented in the legislative enactments and the degree of effective consultation and participation in the process of formulating the respective legislative acts. The particular questions to be answered are: to what extent the ABS legislation in Sarawak has conformed to ABS requirements in the CBD; how have the legislative acts been implemented by the respective authorities and what are the strengths and limitations of the legislative acts? For purposes of this evaluation, comparison will be made between the situation in Sarawak and in the Philippines, specifically with regards to Philippines Executive Order 247. It is the conclusion that Sarawak has not via its ABS legislation; conform to ABS requirements as reflected in the CBD, particularly in regards to the adequate protection of the interests of the indigenous peoples. The basic foundation of ABS legal framework in Sarawak is not compatible with Philippines and unless this is improved, Sarawak will not have an adequate legal infrastructure to support its involvement in future biotechnology-related activities.",
keywords = "ABS legislation, Access and benefit-sharing, Bioprospecting, Genetic resources, Indigenous peoples",
author = "Rohaida Nordin and Hassan, {Kamal Halili} and Zainol, {Zinatul Ashiqin} and Rohimi Shapiee and Faridah Jalil and Witbrodt, {M. A.} and Hassan, {M. S.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.3923/rjasci.2012.185.193",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "185--193",
journal = "Research Journal of Applied Sciences",
issn = "1815-932X",
publisher = "Medwell Publishing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulating access to genetic resources and the sharing of benefit through the Sarawak access benefit-sharing legislation

AU - Nordin, Rohaida

AU - Hassan, Kamal Halili

AU - Zainol, Zinatul Ashiqin

AU - Shapiee, Rohimi

AU - Jalil, Faridah

AU - Witbrodt, M. A.

AU - Hassan, M. S.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Currently, Malaysia does not have specific national legislation to regulate access to its genetic resources and ensure equitable sharing of benefits derived from their commercialisation (ABS legislation). However, the States of Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia have enacted their ABS legislations to be implemented within their States territories. This research will examine how Sarawak provides for mechanism for resolving conflicting interests in genetic resources. For purposes of this study, this research will evaluate Sarawak ABS legislation, namely, the Sarawak Biodiversity Centre Ordinance in 1997 and Sarawak Biodiversity Regulation in 2004. The principal issues to be considered are the manner in which the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is reflected in the legislative enactments; the degree to which the CBD was implemented in the legislative enactments and the degree of effective consultation and participation in the process of formulating the respective legislative acts. The particular questions to be answered are: to what extent the ABS legislation in Sarawak has conformed to ABS requirements in the CBD; how have the legislative acts been implemented by the respective authorities and what are the strengths and limitations of the legislative acts? For purposes of this evaluation, comparison will be made between the situation in Sarawak and in the Philippines, specifically with regards to Philippines Executive Order 247. It is the conclusion that Sarawak has not via its ABS legislation; conform to ABS requirements as reflected in the CBD, particularly in regards to the adequate protection of the interests of the indigenous peoples. The basic foundation of ABS legal framework in Sarawak is not compatible with Philippines and unless this is improved, Sarawak will not have an adequate legal infrastructure to support its involvement in future biotechnology-related activities.

AB - Currently, Malaysia does not have specific national legislation to regulate access to its genetic resources and ensure equitable sharing of benefits derived from their commercialisation (ABS legislation). However, the States of Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia have enacted their ABS legislations to be implemented within their States territories. This research will examine how Sarawak provides for mechanism for resolving conflicting interests in genetic resources. For purposes of this study, this research will evaluate Sarawak ABS legislation, namely, the Sarawak Biodiversity Centre Ordinance in 1997 and Sarawak Biodiversity Regulation in 2004. The principal issues to be considered are the manner in which the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is reflected in the legislative enactments; the degree to which the CBD was implemented in the legislative enactments and the degree of effective consultation and participation in the process of formulating the respective legislative acts. The particular questions to be answered are: to what extent the ABS legislation in Sarawak has conformed to ABS requirements in the CBD; how have the legislative acts been implemented by the respective authorities and what are the strengths and limitations of the legislative acts? For purposes of this evaluation, comparison will be made between the situation in Sarawak and in the Philippines, specifically with regards to Philippines Executive Order 247. It is the conclusion that Sarawak has not via its ABS legislation; conform to ABS requirements as reflected in the CBD, particularly in regards to the adequate protection of the interests of the indigenous peoples. The basic foundation of ABS legal framework in Sarawak is not compatible with Philippines and unless this is improved, Sarawak will not have an adequate legal infrastructure to support its involvement in future biotechnology-related activities.

KW - ABS legislation

KW - Access and benefit-sharing

KW - Bioprospecting

KW - Genetic resources

KW - Indigenous peoples

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864034659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864034659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3923/rjasci.2012.185.193

DO - 10.3923/rjasci.2012.185.193

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84864034659

VL - 7

SP - 185

EP - 193

JO - Research Journal of Applied Sciences

JF - Research Journal of Applied Sciences

SN - 1815-932X

IS - 3

ER -