Regional infraclavicular blocks via the coracoid approach for below-elbow surgery: A comparison between ultrasound guidance with, or without, nerve stimulation

F. M T Azmin, Yin Choy Choy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This randomised, observer-blinded study compared brachial plexus infraclavicular block under ultrasound guidance with, or without, nerve stimulation, for patients undergoing below-elbow surgery. Sixty-six patients, aged 18-70 years, with American Society Anesthesiologists' status I, II or III, were randomised into two groups. Brachial plexus infraclavicular block achieved success rates of 76% in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and 82% in the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, but was not significantly different (p-value 0.55). Block supplementation rates were 18.2% in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group vs. 12.2% in the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group (p-value 0.55), resulting in 100% of the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group reaching complete successful block, compared to 97% of the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group. The mean performance time was significantly shorter in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group compared to the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group (8.9 ± 3.9 minutes and 14.7 ± 3.3 minutes, respectively, p-value 0.001). Block onset time was 24.39 ± 4.3 minutes and 21.51 ± 2.4 minutes for the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, respectively. The block onset time was significantly different between the groups (mean difference of 2.88, p-value 0.023). However, there was no difference in the time to readiness for surgery or surgical analgesia between the groups: ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation (33.3 ± 8 minutes), and ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation (36 ± 6 minutes) (p-value 0.09). Patients' satisfaction was 93.9% vs. 87.9% in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, respectively (p-value 0.39). In this study, the use of ultrasound guidance alone for brachial plexus infraclavicular block provided rapid performance and yielded a high success rate without the aid of a nerve stimulator.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)263-269
    Number of pages7
    JournalSouthern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia
    Volume19
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Elbow
    Patient Satisfaction
    Analgesia
    Brachial Plexus Block

    Keywords

    • Brachial plexus infraclavicular block
    • Coracoid approach
    • Nerve stimulation
    • Ultrasound guidance

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

    Cite this

    @article{c30af72933404adeaadf3ea15f6d41a3,
    title = "Regional infraclavicular blocks via the coracoid approach for below-elbow surgery: A comparison between ultrasound guidance with, or without, nerve stimulation",
    abstract = "This randomised, observer-blinded study compared brachial plexus infraclavicular block under ultrasound guidance with, or without, nerve stimulation, for patients undergoing below-elbow surgery. Sixty-six patients, aged 18-70 years, with American Society Anesthesiologists' status I, II or III, were randomised into two groups. Brachial plexus infraclavicular block achieved success rates of 76{\%} in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and 82{\%} in the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, but was not significantly different (p-value 0.55). Block supplementation rates were 18.2{\%} in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group vs. 12.2{\%} in the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group (p-value 0.55), resulting in 100{\%} of the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group reaching complete successful block, compared to 97{\%} of the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group. The mean performance time was significantly shorter in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group compared to the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group (8.9 ± 3.9 minutes and 14.7 ± 3.3 minutes, respectively, p-value 0.001). Block onset time was 24.39 ± 4.3 minutes and 21.51 ± 2.4 minutes for the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, respectively. The block onset time was significantly different between the groups (mean difference of 2.88, p-value 0.023). However, there was no difference in the time to readiness for surgery or surgical analgesia between the groups: ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation (33.3 ± 8 minutes), and ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation (36 ± 6 minutes) (p-value 0.09). Patients' satisfaction was 93.9{\%} vs. 87.9{\%} in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, respectively (p-value 0.39). In this study, the use of ultrasound guidance alone for brachial plexus infraclavicular block provided rapid performance and yielded a high success rate without the aid of a nerve stimulator.",
    keywords = "Brachial plexus infraclavicular block, Coracoid approach, Nerve stimulation, Ultrasound guidance",
    author = "Azmin, {F. M T} and Choy, {Yin Choy}",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "19",
    pages = "263--269",
    journal = "Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia",
    issn = "2220-1181",
    publisher = "In House Publications",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Regional infraclavicular blocks via the coracoid approach for below-elbow surgery

    T2 - A comparison between ultrasound guidance with, or without, nerve stimulation

    AU - Azmin, F. M T

    AU - Choy, Yin Choy

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - This randomised, observer-blinded study compared brachial plexus infraclavicular block under ultrasound guidance with, or without, nerve stimulation, for patients undergoing below-elbow surgery. Sixty-six patients, aged 18-70 years, with American Society Anesthesiologists' status I, II or III, were randomised into two groups. Brachial plexus infraclavicular block achieved success rates of 76% in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and 82% in the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, but was not significantly different (p-value 0.55). Block supplementation rates were 18.2% in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group vs. 12.2% in the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group (p-value 0.55), resulting in 100% of the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group reaching complete successful block, compared to 97% of the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group. The mean performance time was significantly shorter in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group compared to the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group (8.9 ± 3.9 minutes and 14.7 ± 3.3 minutes, respectively, p-value 0.001). Block onset time was 24.39 ± 4.3 minutes and 21.51 ± 2.4 minutes for the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, respectively. The block onset time was significantly different between the groups (mean difference of 2.88, p-value 0.023). However, there was no difference in the time to readiness for surgery or surgical analgesia between the groups: ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation (33.3 ± 8 minutes), and ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation (36 ± 6 minutes) (p-value 0.09). Patients' satisfaction was 93.9% vs. 87.9% in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, respectively (p-value 0.39). In this study, the use of ultrasound guidance alone for brachial plexus infraclavicular block provided rapid performance and yielded a high success rate without the aid of a nerve stimulator.

    AB - This randomised, observer-blinded study compared brachial plexus infraclavicular block under ultrasound guidance with, or without, nerve stimulation, for patients undergoing below-elbow surgery. Sixty-six patients, aged 18-70 years, with American Society Anesthesiologists' status I, II or III, were randomised into two groups. Brachial plexus infraclavicular block achieved success rates of 76% in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and 82% in the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, but was not significantly different (p-value 0.55). Block supplementation rates were 18.2% in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group vs. 12.2% in the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group (p-value 0.55), resulting in 100% of the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group reaching complete successful block, compared to 97% of the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group. The mean performance time was significantly shorter in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group compared to the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group (8.9 ± 3.9 minutes and 14.7 ± 3.3 minutes, respectively, p-value 0.001). Block onset time was 24.39 ± 4.3 minutes and 21.51 ± 2.4 minutes for the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, respectively. The block onset time was significantly different between the groups (mean difference of 2.88, p-value 0.023). However, there was no difference in the time to readiness for surgery or surgical analgesia between the groups: ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation (33.3 ± 8 minutes), and ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation (36 ± 6 minutes) (p-value 0.09). Patients' satisfaction was 93.9% vs. 87.9% in the ultrasound guidance without nerve stimulation group and the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group, respectively (p-value 0.39). In this study, the use of ultrasound guidance alone for brachial plexus infraclavicular block provided rapid performance and yielded a high success rate without the aid of a nerve stimulator.

    KW - Brachial plexus infraclavicular block

    KW - Coracoid approach

    KW - Nerve stimulation

    KW - Ultrasound guidance

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885798949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885798949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84885798949

    VL - 19

    SP - 263

    EP - 269

    JO - Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia

    JF - Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia

    SN - 2220-1181

    IS - 5

    ER -