Reconstructing the idea of critique session in architecture studio

N. Utaberta, B. Hassanpour, Adi Irfan Che Ani, Mastor Surat

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The core of architectural curriculum has always based on the design studio model which focuses on learning by doing and all processes and procedures of problem solving are transmitting trough lectures and critique sessions. The tutorial system in design studios is same as master-Apprentice. So students learn during a communication between students and teachers and also between students. By this way each student will have a chance to express his/her own perceptions and ideas and make a dialogue with experts (teachers) and peers and expose him/her self to their judgments. The current model in studios is based on ancient model. In some cases the traditional design studio in a school of architecture consists of a teacher telling students what to do and student doing what they are told. This traditional model must be redefined and be made clearer in order to improve both learning and teaching methods. This paper tries to analyze studio types and implemented methods of critique in them with the case of 2nd year studio of Architecture Department of The National University of Malaysia in order to find their weak and strong points and also to identify approaches and procedures that can be used to improve the studio based pedagogy in architecture. From this research it can be identified and analyzed that current studio exercise require a new mindset and new framework to be reconstructed and remodelled.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Pages94-102
Number of pages9
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
EventKongres Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran UKM, 2010 - Tanjung Keling, Melaka, Malaysia
Duration: 13 Dec 201015 Dec 2010

Other

OtherKongres Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran UKM, 2010
CountryMalaysia
CityTanjung Keling, Melaka
Period13/12/1015/12/10

Fingerprint

Students
student
Teaching
apprentice
Learning
learning method
teacher
teaching method
Malaysia
student teacher
Curriculum
dialogue
expert
curriculum
Communication
Exercise
communication
school
learning
Research

Keywords

  • Architecture design
  • Architecture studio
  • Critique session

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Utaberta, N., Hassanpour, B., Che Ani, A. I., & Surat, M. (2011). Reconstructing the idea of critique session in architecture studio. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 18, pp. 94-102) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.014

Reconstructing the idea of critique session in architecture studio. / Utaberta, N.; Hassanpour, B.; Che Ani, Adi Irfan; Surat, Mastor.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 18 2011. p. 94-102.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Utaberta, N, Hassanpour, B, Che Ani, AI & Surat, M 2011, Reconstructing the idea of critique session in architecture studio. in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. vol. 18, pp. 94-102, Kongres Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran UKM, 2010, Tanjung Keling, Melaka, Malaysia, 13/12/10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.014
Utaberta N, Hassanpour B, Che Ani AI, Surat M. Reconstructing the idea of critique session in architecture studio. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 18. 2011. p. 94-102 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.014
Utaberta, N. ; Hassanpour, B. ; Che Ani, Adi Irfan ; Surat, Mastor. / Reconstructing the idea of critique session in architecture studio. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 18 2011. pp. 94-102
@inproceedings{a621e00397554921858bc97a6e6c9f7e,
title = "Reconstructing the idea of critique session in architecture studio",
abstract = "The core of architectural curriculum has always based on the design studio model which focuses on learning by doing and all processes and procedures of problem solving are transmitting trough lectures and critique sessions. The tutorial system in design studios is same as master-Apprentice. So students learn during a communication between students and teachers and also between students. By this way each student will have a chance to express his/her own perceptions and ideas and make a dialogue with experts (teachers) and peers and expose him/her self to their judgments. The current model in studios is based on ancient model. In some cases the traditional design studio in a school of architecture consists of a teacher telling students what to do and student doing what they are told. This traditional model must be redefined and be made clearer in order to improve both learning and teaching methods. This paper tries to analyze studio types and implemented methods of critique in them with the case of 2nd year studio of Architecture Department of The National University of Malaysia in order to find their weak and strong points and also to identify approaches and procedures that can be used to improve the studio based pedagogy in architecture. From this research it can be identified and analyzed that current studio exercise require a new mindset and new framework to be reconstructed and remodelled.",
keywords = "Architecture design, Architecture studio, Critique session",
author = "N. Utaberta and B. Hassanpour and {Che Ani}, {Adi Irfan} and Mastor Surat",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.014",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "94--102",
booktitle = "Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Reconstructing the idea of critique session in architecture studio

AU - Utaberta, N.

AU - Hassanpour, B.

AU - Che Ani, Adi Irfan

AU - Surat, Mastor

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The core of architectural curriculum has always based on the design studio model which focuses on learning by doing and all processes and procedures of problem solving are transmitting trough lectures and critique sessions. The tutorial system in design studios is same as master-Apprentice. So students learn during a communication between students and teachers and also between students. By this way each student will have a chance to express his/her own perceptions and ideas and make a dialogue with experts (teachers) and peers and expose him/her self to their judgments. The current model in studios is based on ancient model. In some cases the traditional design studio in a school of architecture consists of a teacher telling students what to do and student doing what they are told. This traditional model must be redefined and be made clearer in order to improve both learning and teaching methods. This paper tries to analyze studio types and implemented methods of critique in them with the case of 2nd year studio of Architecture Department of The National University of Malaysia in order to find their weak and strong points and also to identify approaches and procedures that can be used to improve the studio based pedagogy in architecture. From this research it can be identified and analyzed that current studio exercise require a new mindset and new framework to be reconstructed and remodelled.

AB - The core of architectural curriculum has always based on the design studio model which focuses on learning by doing and all processes and procedures of problem solving are transmitting trough lectures and critique sessions. The tutorial system in design studios is same as master-Apprentice. So students learn during a communication between students and teachers and also between students. By this way each student will have a chance to express his/her own perceptions and ideas and make a dialogue with experts (teachers) and peers and expose him/her self to their judgments. The current model in studios is based on ancient model. In some cases the traditional design studio in a school of architecture consists of a teacher telling students what to do and student doing what they are told. This traditional model must be redefined and be made clearer in order to improve both learning and teaching methods. This paper tries to analyze studio types and implemented methods of critique in them with the case of 2nd year studio of Architecture Department of The National University of Malaysia in order to find their weak and strong points and also to identify approaches and procedures that can be used to improve the studio based pedagogy in architecture. From this research it can be identified and analyzed that current studio exercise require a new mindset and new framework to be reconstructed and remodelled.

KW - Architecture design

KW - Architecture studio

KW - Critique session

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052120946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052120946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.014

DO - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.014

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 18

SP - 94

EP - 102

BT - Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

ER -