Programme outcomes year III student through integrated project and open ended laboratory

Norliza Abd Rahman, Noorhisham Tan Kofli, Siti Zulaikha Hassan, Siti Rozaimah Sheikh Abdullah, Muhammad Syukri Abd Rahman, Shuhaida Harun

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In the Outcome Based Education curriculum, a student is expected to achieve the Programme Outcomes, (PO) upon graduation and the achievement of the programme outcomes have to be assessed through designated measurement methods. These POs were determined by the departmental review committee for the Outcome Based Education (OBE) and curriculum as well as feedbacks from various stakeholders (i.e. employers, alumni, parents etc.). In July 2012, Engineering Accreditation council, EAC has come out with new changes in their manual and dramatic change has been introduced on programme outcomes. Due to these changes, the department has taken proactive steps in efforts to fulfill the requirements of new 12 Pos. In an effort to assess the PO achievements, a few means were employed to collect data qualitatively and quantitatively. Among the steps taken are: Employer evaluation during industrial training, Alumni Survey, Exit Survey, Integrated project (IP), Open Ended Laboratory (OEL), Final Year Design Project, Final Year Research Project and formative assessment on course outcomes (before and after). In this paper, the assessments of PO Year III student through IP and OEL are elaborate in detail. The PO measure in IP are PO1 until PO11 excluding PO4 and PO12 whereas for OEL measure PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO9, PO10 and PO11. Marks > 50% obtained is an indicator of achievement of the PO obtained from Integrated Project and Open Ended Laboratory. The result shows that achievement of PO was at 50% and above for all measured POs.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities"
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
Pages1202-1206
Number of pages5
Volume10-13-April-2016
ISBN (Electronic)9781467386333
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 May 2016
Event2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016 - Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Duration: 10 Apr 201613 Apr 2016

Other

Other2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016
CountryUnited Arab Emirates
CityAbu Dhabi
Period10/4/1613/4/16

Fingerprint

Students
Curricula
student
Education
Accreditation
alumni
employer
Feedback
measurement method
Integrated
education curriculum
accreditation
parents
research project
stakeholder
engineering
curriculum
evaluation
education
Employers

Keywords

  • curriculum
  • indicator
  • learning outcomes
  • Open Ended Laboratory
  • Outcome Based Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Education

Cite this

Abd Rahman, N., Tan Kofli, N., Hassan, S. Z., Sheikh Abdullah, S. R., Rahman, M. S. A., & Harun, S. (2016). Programme outcomes year III student through integrated project and open ended laboratory. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities" (Vol. 10-13-April-2016, pp. 1202-1206). [7474709] IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474709

Programme outcomes year III student through integrated project and open ended laboratory. / Abd Rahman, Norliza; Tan Kofli, Noorhisham; Hassan, Siti Zulaikha; Sheikh Abdullah, Siti Rozaimah; Rahman, Muhammad Syukri Abd; Harun, Shuhaida.

Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities". Vol. 10-13-April-2016 IEEE Computer Society, 2016. p. 1202-1206 7474709.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abd Rahman, N, Tan Kofli, N, Hassan, SZ, Sheikh Abdullah, SR, Rahman, MSA & Harun, S 2016, Programme outcomes year III student through integrated project and open ended laboratory. in Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities". vol. 10-13-April-2016, 7474709, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1202-1206, 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 10/4/16. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474709
Abd Rahman N, Tan Kofli N, Hassan SZ, Sheikh Abdullah SR, Rahman MSA, Harun S. Programme outcomes year III student through integrated project and open ended laboratory. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities". Vol. 10-13-April-2016. IEEE Computer Society. 2016. p. 1202-1206. 7474709 https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474709
Abd Rahman, Norliza ; Tan Kofli, Noorhisham ; Hassan, Siti Zulaikha ; Sheikh Abdullah, Siti Rozaimah ; Rahman, Muhammad Syukri Abd ; Harun, Shuhaida. / Programme outcomes year III student through integrated project and open ended laboratory. Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities". Vol. 10-13-April-2016 IEEE Computer Society, 2016. pp. 1202-1206
@inproceedings{ff7c3722f625447383f3e0cb37ecdfcc,
title = "Programme outcomes year III student through integrated project and open ended laboratory",
abstract = "In the Outcome Based Education curriculum, a student is expected to achieve the Programme Outcomes, (PO) upon graduation and the achievement of the programme outcomes have to be assessed through designated measurement methods. These POs were determined by the departmental review committee for the Outcome Based Education (OBE) and curriculum as well as feedbacks from various stakeholders (i.e. employers, alumni, parents etc.). In July 2012, Engineering Accreditation council, EAC has come out with new changes in their manual and dramatic change has been introduced on programme outcomes. Due to these changes, the department has taken proactive steps in efforts to fulfill the requirements of new 12 Pos. In an effort to assess the PO achievements, a few means were employed to collect data qualitatively and quantitatively. Among the steps taken are: Employer evaluation during industrial training, Alumni Survey, Exit Survey, Integrated project (IP), Open Ended Laboratory (OEL), Final Year Design Project, Final Year Research Project and formative assessment on course outcomes (before and after). In this paper, the assessments of PO Year III student through IP and OEL are elaborate in detail. The PO measure in IP are PO1 until PO11 excluding PO4 and PO12 whereas for OEL measure PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO9, PO10 and PO11. Marks > 50{\%} obtained is an indicator of achievement of the PO obtained from Integrated Project and Open Ended Laboratory. The result shows that achievement of PO was at 50{\%} and above for all measured POs.",
keywords = "curriculum, indicator, learning outcomes, Open Ended Laboratory, Outcome Based Education",
author = "{Abd Rahman}, Norliza and {Tan Kofli}, Noorhisham and Hassan, {Siti Zulaikha} and {Sheikh Abdullah}, {Siti Rozaimah} and Rahman, {Muhammad Syukri Abd} and Shuhaida Harun",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474709",
language = "English",
volume = "10-13-April-2016",
pages = "1202--1206",
booktitle = "Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: {"}Smart Education in Smart Cities{"}",
publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Programme outcomes year III student through integrated project and open ended laboratory

AU - Abd Rahman, Norliza

AU - Tan Kofli, Noorhisham

AU - Hassan, Siti Zulaikha

AU - Sheikh Abdullah, Siti Rozaimah

AU - Rahman, Muhammad Syukri Abd

AU - Harun, Shuhaida

PY - 2016/5/19

Y1 - 2016/5/19

N2 - In the Outcome Based Education curriculum, a student is expected to achieve the Programme Outcomes, (PO) upon graduation and the achievement of the programme outcomes have to be assessed through designated measurement methods. These POs were determined by the departmental review committee for the Outcome Based Education (OBE) and curriculum as well as feedbacks from various stakeholders (i.e. employers, alumni, parents etc.). In July 2012, Engineering Accreditation council, EAC has come out with new changes in their manual and dramatic change has been introduced on programme outcomes. Due to these changes, the department has taken proactive steps in efforts to fulfill the requirements of new 12 Pos. In an effort to assess the PO achievements, a few means were employed to collect data qualitatively and quantitatively. Among the steps taken are: Employer evaluation during industrial training, Alumni Survey, Exit Survey, Integrated project (IP), Open Ended Laboratory (OEL), Final Year Design Project, Final Year Research Project and formative assessment on course outcomes (before and after). In this paper, the assessments of PO Year III student through IP and OEL are elaborate in detail. The PO measure in IP are PO1 until PO11 excluding PO4 and PO12 whereas for OEL measure PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO9, PO10 and PO11. Marks > 50% obtained is an indicator of achievement of the PO obtained from Integrated Project and Open Ended Laboratory. The result shows that achievement of PO was at 50% and above for all measured POs.

AB - In the Outcome Based Education curriculum, a student is expected to achieve the Programme Outcomes, (PO) upon graduation and the achievement of the programme outcomes have to be assessed through designated measurement methods. These POs were determined by the departmental review committee for the Outcome Based Education (OBE) and curriculum as well as feedbacks from various stakeholders (i.e. employers, alumni, parents etc.). In July 2012, Engineering Accreditation council, EAC has come out with new changes in their manual and dramatic change has been introduced on programme outcomes. Due to these changes, the department has taken proactive steps in efforts to fulfill the requirements of new 12 Pos. In an effort to assess the PO achievements, a few means were employed to collect data qualitatively and quantitatively. Among the steps taken are: Employer evaluation during industrial training, Alumni Survey, Exit Survey, Integrated project (IP), Open Ended Laboratory (OEL), Final Year Design Project, Final Year Research Project and formative assessment on course outcomes (before and after). In this paper, the assessments of PO Year III student through IP and OEL are elaborate in detail. The PO measure in IP are PO1 until PO11 excluding PO4 and PO12 whereas for OEL measure PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO9, PO10 and PO11. Marks > 50% obtained is an indicator of achievement of the PO obtained from Integrated Project and Open Ended Laboratory. The result shows that achievement of PO was at 50% and above for all measured POs.

KW - curriculum

KW - indicator

KW - learning outcomes

KW - Open Ended Laboratory

KW - Outcome Based Education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994577865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994577865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474709

DO - 10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474709

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84994577865

VL - 10-13-April-2016

SP - 1202

EP - 1206

BT - Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities"

PB - IEEE Computer Society

ER -