Programme outcomes assessment models in engineering faculties

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Malaysia is currently a member of Washington Accord which recognises substantial equivalence in the accreditation of qualifications for engineering programme among member countries. Under this agreement, assessment of programme outcomes (PO) is now mandatory for all engineering programmes in Malaysia. However, the typical PO assessment model practised by many engineering programmes resulted in vague assessment methods and as a result failed to show concrete continual quality improvement (CQI). The major issues with the model are with regard to the aspect of unclear performance criteria, grades as measurement indicators, lack of evidence, detached used of indirect methods and unclear CQI. A new model which is more holistic and based on looking at each PO as a major thrust with specific performance criteria is proposed. It is expected that the new model will allow one to objectively evaluate whether the students have achieved the criteria, subsequently facilitating CQI implementation within the programme and produced quality engineering graduates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-121
Number of pages7
JournalAsian Social Science
Volume8
Issue number16
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

engineering
Malaysia
Outcome assessment
Outcome Assessment
equivalence
accreditation
qualification
performance
graduate
lack
evidence
Quality improvement
Quality Improvement
student
Performance criteria

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Assessment model
  • Continuous quality improvement
  • Performance criteria
  • Programme outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Programme outcomes assessment models in engineering faculties. / Mohammad, Abdul Wahab; Zaharim, Azami.

In: Asian Social Science, Vol. 8, No. 16, 2012, p. 115-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{88d66e2ff1cc4b34bbd8642a1f9e9e00,
title = "Programme outcomes assessment models in engineering faculties",
abstract = "Malaysia is currently a member of Washington Accord which recognises substantial equivalence in the accreditation of qualifications for engineering programme among member countries. Under this agreement, assessment of programme outcomes (PO) is now mandatory for all engineering programmes in Malaysia. However, the typical PO assessment model practised by many engineering programmes resulted in vague assessment methods and as a result failed to show concrete continual quality improvement (CQI). The major issues with the model are with regard to the aspect of unclear performance criteria, grades as measurement indicators, lack of evidence, detached used of indirect methods and unclear CQI. A new model which is more holistic and based on looking at each PO as a major thrust with specific performance criteria is proposed. It is expected that the new model will allow one to objectively evaluate whether the students have achieved the criteria, subsequently facilitating CQI implementation within the programme and produced quality engineering graduates.",
keywords = "Assessment, Assessment model, Continuous quality improvement, Performance criteria, Programme outcomes",
author = "Mohammad, {Abdul Wahab} and Azami Zaharim",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "115--121",
journal = "Asian Social Science",
issn = "1911-2017",
publisher = "Canadian Center of Science and Education",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Programme outcomes assessment models in engineering faculties

AU - Mohammad, Abdul Wahab

AU - Zaharim, Azami

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Malaysia is currently a member of Washington Accord which recognises substantial equivalence in the accreditation of qualifications for engineering programme among member countries. Under this agreement, assessment of programme outcomes (PO) is now mandatory for all engineering programmes in Malaysia. However, the typical PO assessment model practised by many engineering programmes resulted in vague assessment methods and as a result failed to show concrete continual quality improvement (CQI). The major issues with the model are with regard to the aspect of unclear performance criteria, grades as measurement indicators, lack of evidence, detached used of indirect methods and unclear CQI. A new model which is more holistic and based on looking at each PO as a major thrust with specific performance criteria is proposed. It is expected that the new model will allow one to objectively evaluate whether the students have achieved the criteria, subsequently facilitating CQI implementation within the programme and produced quality engineering graduates.

AB - Malaysia is currently a member of Washington Accord which recognises substantial equivalence in the accreditation of qualifications for engineering programme among member countries. Under this agreement, assessment of programme outcomes (PO) is now mandatory for all engineering programmes in Malaysia. However, the typical PO assessment model practised by many engineering programmes resulted in vague assessment methods and as a result failed to show concrete continual quality improvement (CQI). The major issues with the model are with regard to the aspect of unclear performance criteria, grades as measurement indicators, lack of evidence, detached used of indirect methods and unclear CQI. A new model which is more holistic and based on looking at each PO as a major thrust with specific performance criteria is proposed. It is expected that the new model will allow one to objectively evaluate whether the students have achieved the criteria, subsequently facilitating CQI implementation within the programme and produced quality engineering graduates.

KW - Assessment

KW - Assessment model

KW - Continuous quality improvement

KW - Performance criteria

KW - Programme outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870663241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870663241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 115

EP - 121

JO - Asian Social Science

JF - Asian Social Science

SN - 1911-2017

IS - 16

ER -