Over-skilling and labor market impact: The case of south Korea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many previous studies in the literature concerning qualification-job mismatch have focused primarily on the effect of over-education on labor market outcomes such as wages, whereas the topic of over-skilling has received relatively little attention in the literature primarily due to the unavailability of data. Moreover, some previous studies in the literature have also been constrained by the absence of panel data providing controls for unmeasured heterogeneity that might otherwise bias results. In an attempt to resolve these issues, this paper places emphasis on the wage effect of being over-skilled and extends the analysis by making use of the panel element of the Youth Panel 2007 survey. The major findings confirm and support the findings of other studies as follows: For the whole sample, significant wage penalties exist when over-skilled college graduate workers are compared with their well-matched counterparts. The wage penalties associated with overskilling are stronger for women than for men when the data is disaggregated by gender. It indicates that the problem of being over-skilled is generally more severe in the case of women. For both genders, the wage effects of being over-skilled are greatly reduced when accounting for unobserved individual-specific characteristics such as lower abilities. The results mentioned indicate that the use of appropriate panel methodology considerably reduces the size of the relevant coefficients and suggest that cross-section results should be viewed with caution, particularly in the Korean setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalAsia-Pacific Social Science Review
Volume19
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

South Korea
wage
labor market
penalty
gender
mismatch
qualification
graduate
Labour market
Market impact
Wages
Labour Market
worker
methodology
ability
trend
literature
education
Penalty

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Over-education
  • Over-skilling
  • Skill mismatch
  • Wages

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Over-skilling and labor market impact : The case of south Korea. / Park, Kihong; Shahiri, Hazrul Izuan.

In: Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, 01.06.2019, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{685a921f3b944e04aa768aee2a1ee572,
title = "Over-skilling and labor market impact: The case of south Korea",
abstract = "Many previous studies in the literature concerning qualification-job mismatch have focused primarily on the effect of over-education on labor market outcomes such as wages, whereas the topic of over-skilling has received relatively little attention in the literature primarily due to the unavailability of data. Moreover, some previous studies in the literature have also been constrained by the absence of panel data providing controls for unmeasured heterogeneity that might otherwise bias results. In an attempt to resolve these issues, this paper places emphasis on the wage effect of being over-skilled and extends the analysis by making use of the panel element of the Youth Panel 2007 survey. The major findings confirm and support the findings of other studies as follows: For the whole sample, significant wage penalties exist when over-skilled college graduate workers are compared with their well-matched counterparts. The wage penalties associated with overskilling are stronger for women than for men when the data is disaggregated by gender. It indicates that the problem of being over-skilled is generally more severe in the case of women. For both genders, the wage effects of being over-skilled are greatly reduced when accounting for unobserved individual-specific characteristics such as lower abilities. The results mentioned indicate that the use of appropriate panel methodology considerably reduces the size of the relevant coefficients and suggest that cross-section results should be viewed with caution, particularly in the Korean setting.",
keywords = "Gender, Over-education, Over-skilling, Skill mismatch, Wages",
author = "Kihong Park and Shahiri, {Hazrul Izuan}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Asia-Pacific Social Science Review",
issn = "0119-8386",
publisher = "De la Salle University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Over-skilling and labor market impact

T2 - The case of south Korea

AU - Park, Kihong

AU - Shahiri, Hazrul Izuan

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Many previous studies in the literature concerning qualification-job mismatch have focused primarily on the effect of over-education on labor market outcomes such as wages, whereas the topic of over-skilling has received relatively little attention in the literature primarily due to the unavailability of data. Moreover, some previous studies in the literature have also been constrained by the absence of panel data providing controls for unmeasured heterogeneity that might otherwise bias results. In an attempt to resolve these issues, this paper places emphasis on the wage effect of being over-skilled and extends the analysis by making use of the panel element of the Youth Panel 2007 survey. The major findings confirm and support the findings of other studies as follows: For the whole sample, significant wage penalties exist when over-skilled college graduate workers are compared with their well-matched counterparts. The wage penalties associated with overskilling are stronger for women than for men when the data is disaggregated by gender. It indicates that the problem of being over-skilled is generally more severe in the case of women. For both genders, the wage effects of being over-skilled are greatly reduced when accounting for unobserved individual-specific characteristics such as lower abilities. The results mentioned indicate that the use of appropriate panel methodology considerably reduces the size of the relevant coefficients and suggest that cross-section results should be viewed with caution, particularly in the Korean setting.

AB - Many previous studies in the literature concerning qualification-job mismatch have focused primarily on the effect of over-education on labor market outcomes such as wages, whereas the topic of over-skilling has received relatively little attention in the literature primarily due to the unavailability of data. Moreover, some previous studies in the literature have also been constrained by the absence of panel data providing controls for unmeasured heterogeneity that might otherwise bias results. In an attempt to resolve these issues, this paper places emphasis on the wage effect of being over-skilled and extends the analysis by making use of the panel element of the Youth Panel 2007 survey. The major findings confirm and support the findings of other studies as follows: For the whole sample, significant wage penalties exist when over-skilled college graduate workers are compared with their well-matched counterparts. The wage penalties associated with overskilling are stronger for women than for men when the data is disaggregated by gender. It indicates that the problem of being over-skilled is generally more severe in the case of women. For both genders, the wage effects of being over-skilled are greatly reduced when accounting for unobserved individual-specific characteristics such as lower abilities. The results mentioned indicate that the use of appropriate panel methodology considerably reduces the size of the relevant coefficients and suggest that cross-section results should be viewed with caution, particularly in the Korean setting.

KW - Gender

KW - Over-education

KW - Over-skilling

KW - Skill mismatch

KW - Wages

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070292171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070292171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070292171

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Asia-Pacific Social Science Review

JF - Asia-Pacific Social Science Review

SN - 0119-8386

IS - 2

ER -