Outcomes of Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Implant at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC)

Suhana Abdul Rahim, Bee See Goh, Safinaz Zainor, Abdul Rahman Roslenda, Asma Abdullah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The cross sectional study was conducted in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center (UKMMC), Malaysia from August 2012 to December 2013. All patients implanted with in UKMMC from December 2001 until December 2012 was included. Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaires and UKMMC questionnaires were used as part of the assessment tool. The GBI is a scoring which measures the change in health status produced by surgical interventions. UKMMC questionnaires was invented by our department to assess questions related to social and life style of patients and also the cosmetic perspective Baha implant and other daily related activities. The audiological assessment was assessed using hearing aid gain threshold. Complication with regards to skin reaction was graded using Holger Skin Classification. A total of 40 patients underwent Baha implant were recruited but only 35 patients fulfilled the criteria and included in this study for analysis. Age of patients ranged from 5 year old to 38 year old, with median of 13 years old. There were 22 patients (62.8%) were male and 13 patients (37.1%) were females. Almost all cases were canal atresia except one adult patient was a case of bilateral chronic discharging ear with chronic irritation with ear mould. Majority of patients 21 (60%) have hearing level of moderate to severe hearing loss (40–89 dB) and 14 patients (40%) have mild to moderate hearing loss (20–39 dB). The level of hearing was retested post operatively. All of the patients have improvement in their aided hearing with the range of 10–25 dBL which is statistically significant at p value of <0.05. The GBI was scored positively in all subscales. Majority of patients (91.4%) used BAHA more than 4 h per day and 88.6% agreed that BAHA is cosmetically acceptable. All patients experienced some form of skin irritation (Holger grade 1–2) however only 20% required surgical intervention. All our patients have range of 10–25 dB improvement of their aided hearing which is statistically significant at p value of <0.05. BAHA has been proven to show significant benefit in audiological improvement and quality of life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalIndian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 12 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Hearing Aids
Malaysia
Bone and Bones
Hearing
Hearing Loss
Equipment and Supplies
Skin
Cosmetics
Health Status
Ear
Life Style

Keywords

  • Baha implant
  • Bone conduction hearing aid
  • Conductive hearing loss
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Outcomes of Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Implant at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC). / Rahim, Suhana Abdul; Goh, Bee See; Zainor, Safinaz; Roslenda, Abdul Rahman; Abdullah, Asma.

In: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 12.09.2017, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c0b95d036ffb4816a0d77337e0726ba9,
title = "Outcomes of Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Implant at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC)",
abstract = "The cross sectional study was conducted in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center (UKMMC), Malaysia from August 2012 to December 2013. All patients implanted with in UKMMC from December 2001 until December 2012 was included. Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaires and UKMMC questionnaires were used as part of the assessment tool. The GBI is a scoring which measures the change in health status produced by surgical interventions. UKMMC questionnaires was invented by our department to assess questions related to social and life style of patients and also the cosmetic perspective Baha implant and other daily related activities. The audiological assessment was assessed using hearing aid gain threshold. Complication with regards to skin reaction was graded using Holger Skin Classification. A total of 40 patients underwent Baha implant were recruited but only 35 patients fulfilled the criteria and included in this study for analysis. Age of patients ranged from 5 year old to 38 year old, with median of 13 years old. There were 22 patients (62.8{\%}) were male and 13 patients (37.1{\%}) were females. Almost all cases were canal atresia except one adult patient was a case of bilateral chronic discharging ear with chronic irritation with ear mould. Majority of patients 21 (60{\%}) have hearing level of moderate to severe hearing loss (40–89 dB) and 14 patients (40{\%}) have mild to moderate hearing loss (20–39 dB). The level of hearing was retested post operatively. All of the patients have improvement in their aided hearing with the range of 10–25 dBL which is statistically significant at p value of <0.05. The GBI was scored positively in all subscales. Majority of patients (91.4{\%}) used BAHA more than 4 h per day and 88.6{\%} agreed that BAHA is cosmetically acceptable. All patients experienced some form of skin irritation (Holger grade 1–2) however only 20{\%} required surgical intervention. All our patients have range of 10–25 dB improvement of their aided hearing which is statistically significant at p value of <0.05. BAHA has been proven to show significant benefit in audiological improvement and quality of life.",
keywords = "Baha implant, Bone conduction hearing aid, Conductive hearing loss, Quality of life",
author = "Rahim, {Suhana Abdul} and Goh, {Bee See} and Safinaz Zainor and Roslenda, {Abdul Rahman} and Asma Abdullah",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s12070-017-1193-3",
language = "English",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "2231-3796",
publisher = "Springer India",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Implant at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC)

AU - Rahim, Suhana Abdul

AU - Goh, Bee See

AU - Zainor, Safinaz

AU - Roslenda, Abdul Rahman

AU - Abdullah, Asma

PY - 2017/9/12

Y1 - 2017/9/12

N2 - The cross sectional study was conducted in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center (UKMMC), Malaysia from August 2012 to December 2013. All patients implanted with in UKMMC from December 2001 until December 2012 was included. Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaires and UKMMC questionnaires were used as part of the assessment tool. The GBI is a scoring which measures the change in health status produced by surgical interventions. UKMMC questionnaires was invented by our department to assess questions related to social and life style of patients and also the cosmetic perspective Baha implant and other daily related activities. The audiological assessment was assessed using hearing aid gain threshold. Complication with regards to skin reaction was graded using Holger Skin Classification. A total of 40 patients underwent Baha implant were recruited but only 35 patients fulfilled the criteria and included in this study for analysis. Age of patients ranged from 5 year old to 38 year old, with median of 13 years old. There were 22 patients (62.8%) were male and 13 patients (37.1%) were females. Almost all cases were canal atresia except one adult patient was a case of bilateral chronic discharging ear with chronic irritation with ear mould. Majority of patients 21 (60%) have hearing level of moderate to severe hearing loss (40–89 dB) and 14 patients (40%) have mild to moderate hearing loss (20–39 dB). The level of hearing was retested post operatively. All of the patients have improvement in their aided hearing with the range of 10–25 dBL which is statistically significant at p value of <0.05. The GBI was scored positively in all subscales. Majority of patients (91.4%) used BAHA more than 4 h per day and 88.6% agreed that BAHA is cosmetically acceptable. All patients experienced some form of skin irritation (Holger grade 1–2) however only 20% required surgical intervention. All our patients have range of 10–25 dB improvement of their aided hearing which is statistically significant at p value of <0.05. BAHA has been proven to show significant benefit in audiological improvement and quality of life.

AB - The cross sectional study was conducted in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center (UKMMC), Malaysia from August 2012 to December 2013. All patients implanted with in UKMMC from December 2001 until December 2012 was included. Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaires and UKMMC questionnaires were used as part of the assessment tool. The GBI is a scoring which measures the change in health status produced by surgical interventions. UKMMC questionnaires was invented by our department to assess questions related to social and life style of patients and also the cosmetic perspective Baha implant and other daily related activities. The audiological assessment was assessed using hearing aid gain threshold. Complication with regards to skin reaction was graded using Holger Skin Classification. A total of 40 patients underwent Baha implant were recruited but only 35 patients fulfilled the criteria and included in this study for analysis. Age of patients ranged from 5 year old to 38 year old, with median of 13 years old. There were 22 patients (62.8%) were male and 13 patients (37.1%) were females. Almost all cases were canal atresia except one adult patient was a case of bilateral chronic discharging ear with chronic irritation with ear mould. Majority of patients 21 (60%) have hearing level of moderate to severe hearing loss (40–89 dB) and 14 patients (40%) have mild to moderate hearing loss (20–39 dB). The level of hearing was retested post operatively. All of the patients have improvement in their aided hearing with the range of 10–25 dBL which is statistically significant at p value of <0.05. The GBI was scored positively in all subscales. Majority of patients (91.4%) used BAHA more than 4 h per day and 88.6% agreed that BAHA is cosmetically acceptable. All patients experienced some form of skin irritation (Holger grade 1–2) however only 20% required surgical intervention. All our patients have range of 10–25 dB improvement of their aided hearing which is statistically significant at p value of <0.05. BAHA has been proven to show significant benefit in audiological improvement and quality of life.

KW - Baha implant

KW - Bone conduction hearing aid

KW - Conductive hearing loss

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029175327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029175327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12070-017-1193-3

DO - 10.1007/s12070-017-1193-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029175327

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

JF - Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 2231-3796

ER -