Optimization and rheological properties of chicken ball as affected by κ-carrageenan, fish gelatin and chicken meat

Hazmi Yasin, Abd. Salam Babji, Hidayah Ismail

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A Central Composite Rotatable Design (CCRD) was adopted in the optimization of chicken ball with the addition of fish gelatin (1-5 g/100 ml), carrageenan (1-4 g/100 ml), and chicken breast meat (55-65 g/100 g) on textural properties (hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness, and chewiness), cooking gain, and water holding capacity (WHC). For each response, a second-order polynomial model was developed using multiple linear regression analysis. Applying desirability function method, optimum conditions for chicken ball were found to be carrageenan concentration of 1.28 g/100 ml, fish gelatin concentration of 4.62 g/100 ml, and chicken meat concentration of 60.52 g/100 g. At this optimum point, hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness, chewiness, cooking gain, and WHC were found to be 62.59 N, 0.79 mm, 0.625, 30.495 N mm, 106.345, and 5.14 g/100 g, respectively. G' value of control on dynamic rheological properties was the highest among chicken ball samples with addition of carrageenan and gelatin. The higher the mixture concentrations of carrageenan, gelatin and meat, the higher G' value of chicken ball.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-85
Number of pages7
JournalLWT - Food Science and Technology
Volume66
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Carrageenan
chicken meat
carrageenan
Gelatin
gelatin
rheological properties
Meat
Chickens
Fishes
chickens
chewiness
elasticity (mechanics)
cohesion
fish
water holding capacity
hardness
cooking
Elasticity
Hardness
Cooking

Keywords

  • Carrageenan
  • Chicken ball
  • Gelatin
  • Meat concentration
  • Optimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science

Cite this

Optimization and rheological properties of chicken ball as affected by κ-carrageenan, fish gelatin and chicken meat. / Yasin, Hazmi; Babji, Abd. Salam; Ismail, Hidayah.

In: LWT - Food Science and Technology, Vol. 66, 01.03.2016, p. 79-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a8a7ace5fe0f4d13a5087f1b3e795a2b,
title = "Optimization and rheological properties of chicken ball as affected by κ-carrageenan, fish gelatin and chicken meat",
abstract = "A Central Composite Rotatable Design (CCRD) was adopted in the optimization of chicken ball with the addition of fish gelatin (1-5 g/100 ml), carrageenan (1-4 g/100 ml), and chicken breast meat (55-65 g/100 g) on textural properties (hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness, and chewiness), cooking gain, and water holding capacity (WHC). For each response, a second-order polynomial model was developed using multiple linear regression analysis. Applying desirability function method, optimum conditions for chicken ball were found to be carrageenan concentration of 1.28 g/100 ml, fish gelatin concentration of 4.62 g/100 ml, and chicken meat concentration of 60.52 g/100 g. At this optimum point, hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness, chewiness, cooking gain, and WHC were found to be 62.59 N, 0.79 mm, 0.625, 30.495 N mm, 106.345, and 5.14 g/100 g, respectively. G' value of control on dynamic rheological properties was the highest among chicken ball samples with addition of carrageenan and gelatin. The higher the mixture concentrations of carrageenan, gelatin and meat, the higher G' value of chicken ball.",
keywords = "Carrageenan, Chicken ball, Gelatin, Meat concentration, Optimization",
author = "Hazmi Yasin and Babji, {Abd. Salam} and Hidayah Ismail",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.020",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "79--85",
journal = "LWT - Food Science and Technology",
issn = "0023-6438",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimization and rheological properties of chicken ball as affected by κ-carrageenan, fish gelatin and chicken meat

AU - Yasin, Hazmi

AU - Babji, Abd. Salam

AU - Ismail, Hidayah

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - A Central Composite Rotatable Design (CCRD) was adopted in the optimization of chicken ball with the addition of fish gelatin (1-5 g/100 ml), carrageenan (1-4 g/100 ml), and chicken breast meat (55-65 g/100 g) on textural properties (hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness, and chewiness), cooking gain, and water holding capacity (WHC). For each response, a second-order polynomial model was developed using multiple linear regression analysis. Applying desirability function method, optimum conditions for chicken ball were found to be carrageenan concentration of 1.28 g/100 ml, fish gelatin concentration of 4.62 g/100 ml, and chicken meat concentration of 60.52 g/100 g. At this optimum point, hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness, chewiness, cooking gain, and WHC were found to be 62.59 N, 0.79 mm, 0.625, 30.495 N mm, 106.345, and 5.14 g/100 g, respectively. G' value of control on dynamic rheological properties was the highest among chicken ball samples with addition of carrageenan and gelatin. The higher the mixture concentrations of carrageenan, gelatin and meat, the higher G' value of chicken ball.

AB - A Central Composite Rotatable Design (CCRD) was adopted in the optimization of chicken ball with the addition of fish gelatin (1-5 g/100 ml), carrageenan (1-4 g/100 ml), and chicken breast meat (55-65 g/100 g) on textural properties (hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness, and chewiness), cooking gain, and water holding capacity (WHC). For each response, a second-order polynomial model was developed using multiple linear regression analysis. Applying desirability function method, optimum conditions for chicken ball were found to be carrageenan concentration of 1.28 g/100 ml, fish gelatin concentration of 4.62 g/100 ml, and chicken meat concentration of 60.52 g/100 g. At this optimum point, hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness, chewiness, cooking gain, and WHC were found to be 62.59 N, 0.79 mm, 0.625, 30.495 N mm, 106.345, and 5.14 g/100 g, respectively. G' value of control on dynamic rheological properties was the highest among chicken ball samples with addition of carrageenan and gelatin. The higher the mixture concentrations of carrageenan, gelatin and meat, the higher G' value of chicken ball.

KW - Carrageenan

KW - Chicken ball

KW - Gelatin

KW - Meat concentration

KW - Optimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84950139602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84950139602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.020

DO - 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84950139602

VL - 66

SP - 79

EP - 85

JO - LWT - Food Science and Technology

JF - LWT - Food Science and Technology

SN - 0023-6438

ER -