Occupational and animals safety in zoos

A legal narrative

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the legal position of human and animal safety in zoos. The risk of injury or even death is high in zoos. Such risk can occur either to the people in charge of zoos, visitors or even to the animals themselves. As such, there are regulations enacted to safeguard people and animals from such risk. Tort is the primary law that governs liability of owner or management of a premise such as a zoo. Negligence and occupier's liability is the main branch of tort law which is the most relevant to accidents in zoos. Preventive law such as the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Factories and Machinery Act are also used in ensuring safety at the work place (zoos). For the welfare and safety of animals captivated in zoos, the Wildlife Conservation legislation is enacted to ensure that animals or wildlife are treated well. Such is the scope of the article. The hypothesis of the study is that an effective law will ensure safety to human employed in and people visiting zoos and animals captivated in the zoos. The management of zoo differs from the management of other organizations. The methodology adopted is legal narrative and analysis with reference to legal instrument such as statutes passed by Parliament (legislative body). This article uses Malaysian law as a point of reference. The study finds that Malaysian law governing safety management in zoos is still inadequate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Occupational Health
zoos
Safety
Legal Liability
animals
Zoo Animals
Safety Management
Animal Welfare
zoo animals
occupational health and safety
Malpractice
Legislation
Workplace
Accidents
Organizations
Wounds and Injuries
wildlife management
working conditions
accidents
factories

Keywords

  • Accident
  • Animals
  • Malaysian Law
  • Regulations
  • Wildlife
  • Zoos

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Occupational and animals safety in zoos : A legal narrative. / Hassan, Kamal Halili.

In: American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 1, 27.12.2013, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ad5395caee6e4aeeada737cb46c119f4,
title = "Occupational and animals safety in zoos: A legal narrative",
abstract = "This article examines the legal position of human and animal safety in zoos. The risk of injury or even death is high in zoos. Such risk can occur either to the people in charge of zoos, visitors or even to the animals themselves. As such, there are regulations enacted to safeguard people and animals from such risk. Tort is the primary law that governs liability of owner or management of a premise such as a zoo. Negligence and occupier's liability is the main branch of tort law which is the most relevant to accidents in zoos. Preventive law such as the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Factories and Machinery Act are also used in ensuring safety at the work place (zoos). For the welfare and safety of animals captivated in zoos, the Wildlife Conservation legislation is enacted to ensure that animals or wildlife are treated well. Such is the scope of the article. The hypothesis of the study is that an effective law will ensure safety to human employed in and people visiting zoos and animals captivated in the zoos. The management of zoo differs from the management of other organizations. The methodology adopted is legal narrative and analysis with reference to legal instrument such as statutes passed by Parliament (legislative body). This article uses Malaysian law as a point of reference. The study finds that Malaysian law governing safety management in zoos is still inadequate.",
keywords = "Accident, Animals, Malaysian Law, Regulations, Wildlife, Zoos",
author = "Hassan, {Kamal Halili}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "27",
doi = "10.3844/ajavssp.2014.1.5",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences",
issn = "1557-4555",
publisher = "Science Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occupational and animals safety in zoos

T2 - A legal narrative

AU - Hassan, Kamal Halili

PY - 2013/12/27

Y1 - 2013/12/27

N2 - This article examines the legal position of human and animal safety in zoos. The risk of injury or even death is high in zoos. Such risk can occur either to the people in charge of zoos, visitors or even to the animals themselves. As such, there are regulations enacted to safeguard people and animals from such risk. Tort is the primary law that governs liability of owner or management of a premise such as a zoo. Negligence and occupier's liability is the main branch of tort law which is the most relevant to accidents in zoos. Preventive law such as the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Factories and Machinery Act are also used in ensuring safety at the work place (zoos). For the welfare and safety of animals captivated in zoos, the Wildlife Conservation legislation is enacted to ensure that animals or wildlife are treated well. Such is the scope of the article. The hypothesis of the study is that an effective law will ensure safety to human employed in and people visiting zoos and animals captivated in the zoos. The management of zoo differs from the management of other organizations. The methodology adopted is legal narrative and analysis with reference to legal instrument such as statutes passed by Parliament (legislative body). This article uses Malaysian law as a point of reference. The study finds that Malaysian law governing safety management in zoos is still inadequate.

AB - This article examines the legal position of human and animal safety in zoos. The risk of injury or even death is high in zoos. Such risk can occur either to the people in charge of zoos, visitors or even to the animals themselves. As such, there are regulations enacted to safeguard people and animals from such risk. Tort is the primary law that governs liability of owner or management of a premise such as a zoo. Negligence and occupier's liability is the main branch of tort law which is the most relevant to accidents in zoos. Preventive law such as the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Factories and Machinery Act are also used in ensuring safety at the work place (zoos). For the welfare and safety of animals captivated in zoos, the Wildlife Conservation legislation is enacted to ensure that animals or wildlife are treated well. Such is the scope of the article. The hypothesis of the study is that an effective law will ensure safety to human employed in and people visiting zoos and animals captivated in the zoos. The management of zoo differs from the management of other organizations. The methodology adopted is legal narrative and analysis with reference to legal instrument such as statutes passed by Parliament (legislative body). This article uses Malaysian law as a point of reference. The study finds that Malaysian law governing safety management in zoos is still inadequate.

KW - Accident

KW - Animals

KW - Malaysian Law

KW - Regulations

KW - Wildlife

KW - Zoos

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896484463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896484463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3844/ajavssp.2014.1.5

DO - 10.3844/ajavssp.2014.1.5

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences

JF - American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences

SN - 1557-4555

IS - 1

ER -