New evidence on natural resource curse for OIC and Non OIC countries

J. A B Kunchu, Tamat Sarmidi, Abu Hassan Shaari Md Nor, Ishak Yussof

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper looks deeper into the resource curse hypothesis and focuses on the types of natural resources such as minerals, oil, natural gas, forestry and coal. This study argues that natural resources are not a curse to real income but that the type of natural resources and human capital that a country is endowed with are the reason why some resource-rich countries are successful while others are not. Unlike most of the previous studies which emphasize growth, this study emphasizes real income. This study also aimed to determine the type of natural resource that may act as a driving force or as an obstacle to a country. Additionally, human capital and institutions are examined as key factors in determining whether a country's rich natural resources are a "blessing" or a "curse".This study provided an empirical analysis of the period between 1981 and 2010 by using panel data which was analyzed using GMM (Generalized Method of Moments), a technique that has not been widely used in research related to natural resources. In order to measure the wealth of natural resources, this study employed the data of natural resource rents in relation to the type of natural resources. The data were collected from the World Bank. The study also used a number of control variables to measure human capital. The findings showed that natural resource wealth in OIC and non-OIC countries can be a curse or a blessing depending on the type of natural resource assets. This is evident from the findings that showed that the correlation between the type of natural resources and incomes is mixed; i.e. there are some positive and some negative correlations. Interestingly, the findings consistently demonstrated that human capital and quality of institution both encourages the increase in real income. The abundance of natural resource is indeed a blessing for high quality human capital.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1767-1792
Number of pages26
JournalPertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Volume24
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

natural resources
evidence
human capital
income
Natural Resources
Curse
Natural resources
Natural resource curse
natural gas
coal
forestry
World Bank
resources
rent
assets
Human Capital
Human capital
Income

Keywords

  • Economic growth
  • Human capital
  • Natural Resource

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

New evidence on natural resource curse for OIC and Non OIC countries. / Kunchu, J. A B; Sarmidi, Tamat; Md Nor, Abu Hassan Shaari; Yussof, Ishak.

In: Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 1767-1792.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6bc67c5b0b64868ae0632a06a5d02cd,
title = "New evidence on natural resource curse for OIC and Non OIC countries",
abstract = "This paper looks deeper into the resource curse hypothesis and focuses on the types of natural resources such as minerals, oil, natural gas, forestry and coal. This study argues that natural resources are not a curse to real income but that the type of natural resources and human capital that a country is endowed with are the reason why some resource-rich countries are successful while others are not. Unlike most of the previous studies which emphasize growth, this study emphasizes real income. This study also aimed to determine the type of natural resource that may act as a driving force or as an obstacle to a country. Additionally, human capital and institutions are examined as key factors in determining whether a country's rich natural resources are a {"}blessing{"} or a {"}curse{"}.This study provided an empirical analysis of the period between 1981 and 2010 by using panel data which was analyzed using GMM (Generalized Method of Moments), a technique that has not been widely used in research related to natural resources. In order to measure the wealth of natural resources, this study employed the data of natural resource rents in relation to the type of natural resources. The data were collected from the World Bank. The study also used a number of control variables to measure human capital. The findings showed that natural resource wealth in OIC and non-OIC countries can be a curse or a blessing depending on the type of natural resource assets. This is evident from the findings that showed that the correlation between the type of natural resources and incomes is mixed; i.e. there are some positive and some negative correlations. Interestingly, the findings consistently demonstrated that human capital and quality of institution both encourages the increase in real income. The abundance of natural resource is indeed a blessing for high quality human capital.",
keywords = "Economic growth, Human capital, Natural Resource",
author = "Kunchu, {J. A B} and Tamat Sarmidi and {Md Nor}, {Abu Hassan Shaari} and Ishak Yussof",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1767--1792",
journal = "Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities",
issn = "0128-7702",
publisher = "Universiti Putra Malaysia",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New evidence on natural resource curse for OIC and Non OIC countries

AU - Kunchu, J. A B

AU - Sarmidi, Tamat

AU - Md Nor, Abu Hassan Shaari

AU - Yussof, Ishak

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - This paper looks deeper into the resource curse hypothesis and focuses on the types of natural resources such as minerals, oil, natural gas, forestry and coal. This study argues that natural resources are not a curse to real income but that the type of natural resources and human capital that a country is endowed with are the reason why some resource-rich countries are successful while others are not. Unlike most of the previous studies which emphasize growth, this study emphasizes real income. This study also aimed to determine the type of natural resource that may act as a driving force or as an obstacle to a country. Additionally, human capital and institutions are examined as key factors in determining whether a country's rich natural resources are a "blessing" or a "curse".This study provided an empirical analysis of the period between 1981 and 2010 by using panel data which was analyzed using GMM (Generalized Method of Moments), a technique that has not been widely used in research related to natural resources. In order to measure the wealth of natural resources, this study employed the data of natural resource rents in relation to the type of natural resources. The data were collected from the World Bank. The study also used a number of control variables to measure human capital. The findings showed that natural resource wealth in OIC and non-OIC countries can be a curse or a blessing depending on the type of natural resource assets. This is evident from the findings that showed that the correlation between the type of natural resources and incomes is mixed; i.e. there are some positive and some negative correlations. Interestingly, the findings consistently demonstrated that human capital and quality of institution both encourages the increase in real income. The abundance of natural resource is indeed a blessing for high quality human capital.

AB - This paper looks deeper into the resource curse hypothesis and focuses on the types of natural resources such as minerals, oil, natural gas, forestry and coal. This study argues that natural resources are not a curse to real income but that the type of natural resources and human capital that a country is endowed with are the reason why some resource-rich countries are successful while others are not. Unlike most of the previous studies which emphasize growth, this study emphasizes real income. This study also aimed to determine the type of natural resource that may act as a driving force or as an obstacle to a country. Additionally, human capital and institutions are examined as key factors in determining whether a country's rich natural resources are a "blessing" or a "curse".This study provided an empirical analysis of the period between 1981 and 2010 by using panel data which was analyzed using GMM (Generalized Method of Moments), a technique that has not been widely used in research related to natural resources. In order to measure the wealth of natural resources, this study employed the data of natural resource rents in relation to the type of natural resources. The data were collected from the World Bank. The study also used a number of control variables to measure human capital. The findings showed that natural resource wealth in OIC and non-OIC countries can be a curse or a blessing depending on the type of natural resource assets. This is evident from the findings that showed that the correlation between the type of natural resources and incomes is mixed; i.e. there are some positive and some negative correlations. Interestingly, the findings consistently demonstrated that human capital and quality of institution both encourages the increase in real income. The abundance of natural resource is indeed a blessing for high quality human capital.

KW - Economic growth

KW - Human capital

KW - Natural Resource

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010682331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010682331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 1767

EP - 1792

JO - Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities

JF - Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities

SN - 0128-7702

IS - 4

ER -