Medical product liability in Malaysia

The need of legislative intervention

Fahirah Syaliza Mokhtar, Rahmah Ismail, Ahmad Munir Mohd Salleh, Zailin Zainal Ariffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A defective medical product directly affects patient in which they are unable to evaluate and make decision as a smart consumer, especially when faced with the use of cutting-edge, complex and sophisticated medical products. Patients who wishes to claim under Consumer Protection Act 1999, encounters many hurdles to satisfy the elements under Part X of the Consumer Protection Act 1999, particularly proving the defect itself and most demanding is proving causal relationship. Hence, the main focus of this article is to examine the challenges encountered by patients in seeking compensation for injury or death due to defective medical products in Malaysia. The objective of the article is to analyze the law of product liability, under the Malaysian Consumer Protection Act 1999, Thailand's Medical Device Act, BE 2551 and also Germany's Pharmaceutical Product Act 1976 aiming at improving the patient's mechanism of compensation. The finding of this article is that, the requirement of proof under Malaysia Consumer Protection Act 1999 for defective medical products is almost impossible to fulfill. Based on the law of Thailand and Germany the analysis highlights that a legislative intervention in the form of adding a particular section in the legislation should be implemented. Thus few improvements are suggested including the amendment to the provisions contained in the Malaysian Consumer Protection Act 1999 as well as including provision of civil liability in the Malaysian Medical Device Act 2012 and Poison Act 1952 to better assists patients in claiming compensation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5162-5165
Number of pages4
JournalSocial Sciences (Pakistan)
Volume11
Issue number21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

producer liability
Malaysia
act
consumer protection
Thailand
Law
pharmaceutical
liability
amendment
legislation
death

Keywords

  • Consumer law
  • Consumer protection
  • Malaysia
  • Medical device
  • Product liability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Medical product liability in Malaysia : The need of legislative intervention. / Mokhtar, Fahirah Syaliza; Ismail, Rahmah; Mohd Salleh, Ahmad Munir; Ariffin, Zailin Zainal.

In: Social Sciences (Pakistan), Vol. 11, No. 21, 2016, p. 5162-5165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mokhtar, Fahirah Syaliza ; Ismail, Rahmah ; Mohd Salleh, Ahmad Munir ; Ariffin, Zailin Zainal. / Medical product liability in Malaysia : The need of legislative intervention. In: Social Sciences (Pakistan). 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 21. pp. 5162-5165.
@article{cc2e9f8d0a014ccda21733e983042971,
title = "Medical product liability in Malaysia: The need of legislative intervention",
abstract = "A defective medical product directly affects patient in which they are unable to evaluate and make decision as a smart consumer, especially when faced with the use of cutting-edge, complex and sophisticated medical products. Patients who wishes to claim under Consumer Protection Act 1999, encounters many hurdles to satisfy the elements under Part X of the Consumer Protection Act 1999, particularly proving the defect itself and most demanding is proving causal relationship. Hence, the main focus of this article is to examine the challenges encountered by patients in seeking compensation for injury or death due to defective medical products in Malaysia. The objective of the article is to analyze the law of product liability, under the Malaysian Consumer Protection Act 1999, Thailand's Medical Device Act, BE 2551 and also Germany's Pharmaceutical Product Act 1976 aiming at improving the patient's mechanism of compensation. The finding of this article is that, the requirement of proof under Malaysia Consumer Protection Act 1999 for defective medical products is almost impossible to fulfill. Based on the law of Thailand and Germany the analysis highlights that a legislative intervention in the form of adding a particular section in the legislation should be implemented. Thus few improvements are suggested including the amendment to the provisions contained in the Malaysian Consumer Protection Act 1999 as well as including provision of civil liability in the Malaysian Medical Device Act 2012 and Poison Act 1952 to better assists patients in claiming compensation.",
keywords = "Consumer law, Consumer protection, Malaysia, Medical device, Product liability",
author = "Mokhtar, {Fahirah Syaliza} and Rahmah Ismail and {Mohd Salleh}, {Ahmad Munir} and Ariffin, {Zailin Zainal}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.3923/sscience.2016.5162.5165",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "5162--5165",
journal = "Social Sciences (Pakistan)",
issn = "1818-5800",
publisher = "Medwell Publishing",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical product liability in Malaysia

T2 - The need of legislative intervention

AU - Mokhtar, Fahirah Syaliza

AU - Ismail, Rahmah

AU - Mohd Salleh, Ahmad Munir

AU - Ariffin, Zailin Zainal

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - A defective medical product directly affects patient in which they are unable to evaluate and make decision as a smart consumer, especially when faced with the use of cutting-edge, complex and sophisticated medical products. Patients who wishes to claim under Consumer Protection Act 1999, encounters many hurdles to satisfy the elements under Part X of the Consumer Protection Act 1999, particularly proving the defect itself and most demanding is proving causal relationship. Hence, the main focus of this article is to examine the challenges encountered by patients in seeking compensation for injury or death due to defective medical products in Malaysia. The objective of the article is to analyze the law of product liability, under the Malaysian Consumer Protection Act 1999, Thailand's Medical Device Act, BE 2551 and also Germany's Pharmaceutical Product Act 1976 aiming at improving the patient's mechanism of compensation. The finding of this article is that, the requirement of proof under Malaysia Consumer Protection Act 1999 for defective medical products is almost impossible to fulfill. Based on the law of Thailand and Germany the analysis highlights that a legislative intervention in the form of adding a particular section in the legislation should be implemented. Thus few improvements are suggested including the amendment to the provisions contained in the Malaysian Consumer Protection Act 1999 as well as including provision of civil liability in the Malaysian Medical Device Act 2012 and Poison Act 1952 to better assists patients in claiming compensation.

AB - A defective medical product directly affects patient in which they are unable to evaluate and make decision as a smart consumer, especially when faced with the use of cutting-edge, complex and sophisticated medical products. Patients who wishes to claim under Consumer Protection Act 1999, encounters many hurdles to satisfy the elements under Part X of the Consumer Protection Act 1999, particularly proving the defect itself and most demanding is proving causal relationship. Hence, the main focus of this article is to examine the challenges encountered by patients in seeking compensation for injury or death due to defective medical products in Malaysia. The objective of the article is to analyze the law of product liability, under the Malaysian Consumer Protection Act 1999, Thailand's Medical Device Act, BE 2551 and also Germany's Pharmaceutical Product Act 1976 aiming at improving the patient's mechanism of compensation. The finding of this article is that, the requirement of proof under Malaysia Consumer Protection Act 1999 for defective medical products is almost impossible to fulfill. Based on the law of Thailand and Germany the analysis highlights that a legislative intervention in the form of adding a particular section in the legislation should be implemented. Thus few improvements are suggested including the amendment to the provisions contained in the Malaysian Consumer Protection Act 1999 as well as including provision of civil liability in the Malaysian Medical Device Act 2012 and Poison Act 1952 to better assists patients in claiming compensation.

KW - Consumer law

KW - Consumer protection

KW - Malaysia

KW - Medical device

KW - Product liability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007335309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007335309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3923/sscience.2016.5162.5165

DO - 10.3923/sscience.2016.5162.5165

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 5162

EP - 5165

JO - Social Sciences (Pakistan)

JF - Social Sciences (Pakistan)

SN - 1818-5800

IS - 21

ER -