Lumbo-pelvic lordosis and the pelvic radius technique in the assessment of spinal sagittal balance: strengths and caveats.

I. G. Sergides, Peter F. McCombe, G. White, Sabarul Mokhtar, William R. Sears

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The two main methodologies described for the assessment of spinal sagittal alignment are the pelvic radius (PR) technique and that based on measures of the Pelvic Incidence (PI) and Spino-Sacral Angle (SSA). Both methods stress the fundamental relationship between the anatomical position and orientation of the sacrum within the pelvis and the spinal curves above. The aim of the current study was to assess the strengths and potential weaknesses of the PR technique. The PR technique uses measures based on a line (the PR), drawn between the hip axis and the posterior corner of the S1 endplate. The angle formed between the PR line and the sacral endplate, PRS1, is a developmental measure of sacropelvic morphology. Geometrically, PI and PRS1 are approximately complementary angles and both reflect reciprocal alterations in pelvic tilt (for PI) or angulation (for PRS1) and the slope of the S1 endplate. The angle formed between PR and T12, the PR-T12, reflects a combined measure of pelvic morphology and lumbar lordosis. It appears to be a useful measure, which provides a simple and rapid assessment of lumbopelvic sagittal balance, but only in the presence of a congruent thoracic curvature. After reviewing the literature, published measures made using the PR technique were compared to measures taken from a substantial patient population (479 adult patients). Errors can occur using the PR technique if the PRT12 is viewed in isolation from the thoracic kyphosis. We found the ratio of the thoracic kyphosis to lumbar lordosis (T4-T12/T12-S1) to be a useful predictor of congruent sagittal alignment, which may alert the clinician to situations where use of the PR-T12 in isolation may be misleading.

Fingerprint

Lordosis
Kyphosis
Thorax
Incidence
Sacrum
Pelvis
Hip
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{6e515ce84b2c4563b9b2d04f9e076d6b,
title = "Lumbo-pelvic lordosis and the pelvic radius technique in the assessment of spinal sagittal balance: strengths and caveats.",
abstract = "The two main methodologies described for the assessment of spinal sagittal alignment are the pelvic radius (PR) technique and that based on measures of the Pelvic Incidence (PI) and Spino-Sacral Angle (SSA). Both methods stress the fundamental relationship between the anatomical position and orientation of the sacrum within the pelvis and the spinal curves above. The aim of the current study was to assess the strengths and potential weaknesses of the PR technique. The PR technique uses measures based on a line (the PR), drawn between the hip axis and the posterior corner of the S1 endplate. The angle formed between the PR line and the sacral endplate, PRS1, is a developmental measure of sacropelvic morphology. Geometrically, PI and PRS1 are approximately complementary angles and both reflect reciprocal alterations in pelvic tilt (for PI) or angulation (for PRS1) and the slope of the S1 endplate. The angle formed between PR and T12, the PR-T12, reflects a combined measure of pelvic morphology and lumbar lordosis. It appears to be a useful measure, which provides a simple and rapid assessment of lumbopelvic sagittal balance, but only in the presence of a congruent thoracic curvature. After reviewing the literature, published measures made using the PR technique were compared to measures taken from a substantial patient population (479 adult patients). Errors can occur using the PR technique if the PRT12 is viewed in isolation from the thoracic kyphosis. We found the ratio of the thoracic kyphosis to lumbar lordosis (T4-T12/T12-S1) to be a useful predictor of congruent sagittal alignment, which may alert the clinician to situations where use of the PR-T12 in isolation may be misleading.",
author = "Sergides, {I. G.} and McCombe, {Peter F.} and G. White and Sabarul Mokhtar and Sears, {William R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-011-1926-z",
language = "English",
volume = "20 Suppl 5",
pages = "591--601",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lumbo-pelvic lordosis and the pelvic radius technique in the assessment of spinal sagittal balance

T2 - strengths and caveats.

AU - Sergides, I. G.

AU - McCombe, Peter F.

AU - White, G.

AU - Mokhtar, Sabarul

AU - Sears, William R.

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - The two main methodologies described for the assessment of spinal sagittal alignment are the pelvic radius (PR) technique and that based on measures of the Pelvic Incidence (PI) and Spino-Sacral Angle (SSA). Both methods stress the fundamental relationship between the anatomical position and orientation of the sacrum within the pelvis and the spinal curves above. The aim of the current study was to assess the strengths and potential weaknesses of the PR technique. The PR technique uses measures based on a line (the PR), drawn between the hip axis and the posterior corner of the S1 endplate. The angle formed between the PR line and the sacral endplate, PRS1, is a developmental measure of sacropelvic morphology. Geometrically, PI and PRS1 are approximately complementary angles and both reflect reciprocal alterations in pelvic tilt (for PI) or angulation (for PRS1) and the slope of the S1 endplate. The angle formed between PR and T12, the PR-T12, reflects a combined measure of pelvic morphology and lumbar lordosis. It appears to be a useful measure, which provides a simple and rapid assessment of lumbopelvic sagittal balance, but only in the presence of a congruent thoracic curvature. After reviewing the literature, published measures made using the PR technique were compared to measures taken from a substantial patient population (479 adult patients). Errors can occur using the PR technique if the PRT12 is viewed in isolation from the thoracic kyphosis. We found the ratio of the thoracic kyphosis to lumbar lordosis (T4-T12/T12-S1) to be a useful predictor of congruent sagittal alignment, which may alert the clinician to situations where use of the PR-T12 in isolation may be misleading.

AB - The two main methodologies described for the assessment of spinal sagittal alignment are the pelvic radius (PR) technique and that based on measures of the Pelvic Incidence (PI) and Spino-Sacral Angle (SSA). Both methods stress the fundamental relationship between the anatomical position and orientation of the sacrum within the pelvis and the spinal curves above. The aim of the current study was to assess the strengths and potential weaknesses of the PR technique. The PR technique uses measures based on a line (the PR), drawn between the hip axis and the posterior corner of the S1 endplate. The angle formed between the PR line and the sacral endplate, PRS1, is a developmental measure of sacropelvic morphology. Geometrically, PI and PRS1 are approximately complementary angles and both reflect reciprocal alterations in pelvic tilt (for PI) or angulation (for PRS1) and the slope of the S1 endplate. The angle formed between PR and T12, the PR-T12, reflects a combined measure of pelvic morphology and lumbar lordosis. It appears to be a useful measure, which provides a simple and rapid assessment of lumbopelvic sagittal balance, but only in the presence of a congruent thoracic curvature. After reviewing the literature, published measures made using the PR technique were compared to measures taken from a substantial patient population (479 adult patients). Errors can occur using the PR technique if the PRT12 is viewed in isolation from the thoracic kyphosis. We found the ratio of the thoracic kyphosis to lumbar lordosis (T4-T12/T12-S1) to be a useful predictor of congruent sagittal alignment, which may alert the clinician to situations where use of the PR-T12 in isolation may be misleading.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027936083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027936083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-011-1926-z

DO - 10.1007/s00586-011-1926-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 21863464

AN - SCOPUS:85027936083

VL - 20 Suppl 5

SP - 591

EP - 601

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

ER -