Penglibatan panel penilai dengan kewibawaan berbeza dalam mengagregat nilai subjektif asas pangkat

Translated title of the contribution: Involvement of panel of evaluators with different credibility in aggregating subjective rank-based values

Maznah Mat Kasim, Abdul Aziz Jemain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The final goal in solving multi-criteria problems is a ranking of the analyzed units based on their overall performance. One way to obtain the overall performance of each unit is by combining its performances and weights of criteria through various aggregation methods. This research focused on the application of three rank-based methods to evaluate the relative importance of criteria which involved one panel evaluators with different credibilitity. There are only two suitable aggregation approaches based on ordered weighted average method are proposed in order to achieve the final result. Every approach proposed is followed by a numerical example.

Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)667-672
Number of pages6
JournalSains Malaysiana
Volume42
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Agglomeration

Keywords

  • Aggregation
  • Credibility
  • Multi-criteria problem
  • Rank
  • Weights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Penglibatan panel penilai dengan kewibawaan berbeza dalam mengagregat nilai subjektif asas pangkat. / Kasim, Maznah Mat; Jemain, Abdul Aziz.

In: Sains Malaysiana, Vol. 42, No. 5, 05.2013, p. 667-672.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kasim, Maznah Mat ; Jemain, Abdul Aziz. / Penglibatan panel penilai dengan kewibawaan berbeza dalam mengagregat nilai subjektif asas pangkat. In: Sains Malaysiana. 2013 ; Vol. 42, No. 5. pp. 667-672.
@article{a2ddfb01a92c42788f8d58a8ca71c271,
title = "Penglibatan panel penilai dengan kewibawaan berbeza dalam mengagregat nilai subjektif asas pangkat",
abstract = "The final goal in solving multi-criteria problems is a ranking of the analyzed units based on their overall performance. One way to obtain the overall performance of each unit is by combining its performances and weights of criteria through various aggregation methods. This research focused on the application of three rank-based methods to evaluate the relative importance of criteria which involved one panel evaluators with different credibilitity. There are only two suitable aggregation approaches based on ordered weighted average method are proposed in order to achieve the final result. Every approach proposed is followed by a numerical example.",
keywords = "Aggregation, Credibility, Multi-criteria problem, Rank, Weights",
author = "Kasim, {Maznah Mat} and Jemain, {Abdul Aziz}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
language = "Undefined/Unknown",
volume = "42",
pages = "667--672",
journal = "Sains Malaysiana",
issn = "0126-6039",
publisher = "Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Penglibatan panel penilai dengan kewibawaan berbeza dalam mengagregat nilai subjektif asas pangkat

AU - Kasim, Maznah Mat

AU - Jemain, Abdul Aziz

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - The final goal in solving multi-criteria problems is a ranking of the analyzed units based on their overall performance. One way to obtain the overall performance of each unit is by combining its performances and weights of criteria through various aggregation methods. This research focused on the application of three rank-based methods to evaluate the relative importance of criteria which involved one panel evaluators with different credibilitity. There are only two suitable aggregation approaches based on ordered weighted average method are proposed in order to achieve the final result. Every approach proposed is followed by a numerical example.

AB - The final goal in solving multi-criteria problems is a ranking of the analyzed units based on their overall performance. One way to obtain the overall performance of each unit is by combining its performances and weights of criteria through various aggregation methods. This research focused on the application of three rank-based methods to evaluate the relative importance of criteria which involved one panel evaluators with different credibilitity. There are only two suitable aggregation approaches based on ordered weighted average method are proposed in order to achieve the final result. Every approach proposed is followed by a numerical example.

KW - Aggregation

KW - Credibility

KW - Multi-criteria problem

KW - Rank

KW - Weights

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876352211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876352211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84876352211

VL - 42

SP - 667

EP - 672

JO - Sains Malaysiana

JF - Sains Malaysiana

SN - 0126-6039

IS - 5

ER -