Interaction in Academic L2 writing: An analysis of Interactional Metadiscourse Strategies in Applied Linguistics Research Articles

Almudhaffari Musa, Supyan Hussin, Imran Abdullah Ho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It has been acknowledged that academic writing is not only content-oriented but also involves various rhetorical strategies that help writers project themselves on text so that the content as well as the writer’s stance can be understood. Interactional metadiscourse (MD) strategies are established to play a rhetorical role that contribute to the persuasiveness of argument. Due to the variation of rhetorical strategies across cultures, L2 writers tend to find some problems employing appropriate interactional MD strategies to express a clear stance and engage readers in the content presented. This paper examines the extent to which interactional MD strategies are employed in advanced L2 writing. To this end, 34 research articles written by Yemeni/Arab applied linguistics L2 writers were analysed. Based on Hyland (2005a), interactional MD strategies were identified via AntConc, a concordance analytical software tool. Moreover, a qualitative analysis was conducted to examine the way how advanced L2 writers use interactional MD strategies to pursue persuasive goals. The findings indicate that L2 writers tend to employ impersonal and less dialogic style in academic writing. A closer in-depth analysis indicates that the most salient interactional strategies in Yemeni L2 writing include making bare assertion as well as marking certainty of claims. They mostly tend to make assertion as they indicate research gaps and express conviction when they state findings and summarize their research. The implications of such findings could be useful for genre analysis, academic writing and L2 writing instruction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-32
Number of pages17
Journal3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

linguistics
writer
interaction
writing instruction
Applied Linguistics
Research Articles
Writer
Metadiscourse
Interaction
L2 Writing
genre
Academic Writing
Stance
Rhetorical Strategies

Keywords

  • Genre analysis
  • Interaction
  • Interactional metadiscourse strategies
  • L2 writing
  • Research articles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

Interaction in Academic L2 writing : An analysis of Interactional Metadiscourse Strategies in Applied Linguistics Research Articles. / Musa, Almudhaffari; Hussin, Supyan; Ho, Imran Abdullah.

In: 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.01.2019, p. 16-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fe5f8ec10d8040ca9017a861b43ecb63,
title = "Interaction in Academic L2 writing: An analysis of Interactional Metadiscourse Strategies in Applied Linguistics Research Articles",
abstract = "It has been acknowledged that academic writing is not only content-oriented but also involves various rhetorical strategies that help writers project themselves on text so that the content as well as the writer’s stance can be understood. Interactional metadiscourse (MD) strategies are established to play a rhetorical role that contribute to the persuasiveness of argument. Due to the variation of rhetorical strategies across cultures, L2 writers tend to find some problems employing appropriate interactional MD strategies to express a clear stance and engage readers in the content presented. This paper examines the extent to which interactional MD strategies are employed in advanced L2 writing. To this end, 34 research articles written by Yemeni/Arab applied linguistics L2 writers were analysed. Based on Hyland (2005a), interactional MD strategies were identified via AntConc, a concordance analytical software tool. Moreover, a qualitative analysis was conducted to examine the way how advanced L2 writers use interactional MD strategies to pursue persuasive goals. The findings indicate that L2 writers tend to employ impersonal and less dialogic style in academic writing. A closer in-depth analysis indicates that the most salient interactional strategies in Yemeni L2 writing include making bare assertion as well as marking certainty of claims. They mostly tend to make assertion as they indicate research gaps and express conviction when they state findings and summarize their research. The implications of such findings could be useful for genre analysis, academic writing and L2 writing instruction.",
keywords = "Genre analysis, Interaction, Interactional metadiscourse strategies, L2 writing, Research articles",
author = "Almudhaffari Musa and Supyan Hussin and Ho, {Imran Abdullah}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17576/3L-2019-2503-02",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "16--32",
journal = "3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature",
issn = "0128-5157",
publisher = "Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interaction in Academic L2 writing

T2 - An analysis of Interactional Metadiscourse Strategies in Applied Linguistics Research Articles

AU - Musa, Almudhaffari

AU - Hussin, Supyan

AU - Ho, Imran Abdullah

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - It has been acknowledged that academic writing is not only content-oriented but also involves various rhetorical strategies that help writers project themselves on text so that the content as well as the writer’s stance can be understood. Interactional metadiscourse (MD) strategies are established to play a rhetorical role that contribute to the persuasiveness of argument. Due to the variation of rhetorical strategies across cultures, L2 writers tend to find some problems employing appropriate interactional MD strategies to express a clear stance and engage readers in the content presented. This paper examines the extent to which interactional MD strategies are employed in advanced L2 writing. To this end, 34 research articles written by Yemeni/Arab applied linguistics L2 writers were analysed. Based on Hyland (2005a), interactional MD strategies were identified via AntConc, a concordance analytical software tool. Moreover, a qualitative analysis was conducted to examine the way how advanced L2 writers use interactional MD strategies to pursue persuasive goals. The findings indicate that L2 writers tend to employ impersonal and less dialogic style in academic writing. A closer in-depth analysis indicates that the most salient interactional strategies in Yemeni L2 writing include making bare assertion as well as marking certainty of claims. They mostly tend to make assertion as they indicate research gaps and express conviction when they state findings and summarize their research. The implications of such findings could be useful for genre analysis, academic writing and L2 writing instruction.

AB - It has been acknowledged that academic writing is not only content-oriented but also involves various rhetorical strategies that help writers project themselves on text so that the content as well as the writer’s stance can be understood. Interactional metadiscourse (MD) strategies are established to play a rhetorical role that contribute to the persuasiveness of argument. Due to the variation of rhetorical strategies across cultures, L2 writers tend to find some problems employing appropriate interactional MD strategies to express a clear stance and engage readers in the content presented. This paper examines the extent to which interactional MD strategies are employed in advanced L2 writing. To this end, 34 research articles written by Yemeni/Arab applied linguistics L2 writers were analysed. Based on Hyland (2005a), interactional MD strategies were identified via AntConc, a concordance analytical software tool. Moreover, a qualitative analysis was conducted to examine the way how advanced L2 writers use interactional MD strategies to pursue persuasive goals. The findings indicate that L2 writers tend to employ impersonal and less dialogic style in academic writing. A closer in-depth analysis indicates that the most salient interactional strategies in Yemeni L2 writing include making bare assertion as well as marking certainty of claims. They mostly tend to make assertion as they indicate research gaps and express conviction when they state findings and summarize their research. The implications of such findings could be useful for genre analysis, academic writing and L2 writing instruction.

KW - Genre analysis

KW - Interaction

KW - Interactional metadiscourse strategies

KW - L2 writing

KW - Research articles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072728721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072728721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17576/3L-2019-2503-02

DO - 10.17576/3L-2019-2503-02

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072728721

VL - 25

SP - 16

EP - 32

JO - 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature

JF - 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature

SN - 0128-5157

IS - 3

ER -