Induced content schema vs induced linguistic schema - Which is more beneficial for Malaysian ESL readers?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-127
Number of pages21
JournalRELC Journal
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint

linguistics
Reader

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Education

Cite this

Induced content schema vs induced linguistic schema - Which is more beneficial for Malaysian ESL readers? / Thang, Siew Ming.

In: RELC Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1997, p. 107-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8e419810fce14c0f8018fa95ee4eb85c,
title = "Induced content schema vs induced linguistic schema - Which is more beneficial for Malaysian ESL readers?",
author = "Thang, {Siew Ming}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1177/003368829702800206",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "107--127",
journal = "RELC Journal",
issn = "0033-6882",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Induced content schema vs induced linguistic schema - Which is more beneficial for Malaysian ESL readers?

AU - Thang, Siew Ming

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61049371296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61049371296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/003368829702800206

DO - 10.1177/003368829702800206

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 107

EP - 127

JO - RELC Journal

JF - RELC Journal

SN - 0033-6882

IS - 2

ER -