Hearing rehabilitation in congenital canal atresia

Ami Mazita, W. H. Wan Fazlina, Asma Abdullah, Bee See Goh, L. Saim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to review the results of our patients with congenital canal atresia after implantation of bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) . The occurrence of complications was also reviewed. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the first 16 patients who had BAHA implantation at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Malaysia. Audiometric assessment was done preoperatively and postoperatively for each patient using the standard procedure. The surgical procedure was described and its complications discussed. Results: The 16 patients consisted of 11 male and five female patients. Their mean age was 8.9 years at the time of the surgery. The main indication was bilateral canal atresia. 11 patients had implantation of BAHA performed in two stages, while the other five patients had it as a single-staged procedure. The complications that occurred were failure of osseointegration (one patient), granulation tissue overgrowth into the abutment (two patients) and cellulitis surrounding the abutment (three patients). The average preoperative unaided air conduction threshold was 64.9 dB and the average postoperative aided hearing threshold was 29.7 dB. The overall mean functional gain was 35.2 dB. Conclusion: BAHA has many advantages over the conventional hearing aid in the form of cosmesis, discomfort and hearing gain. It is a reliable hearing rehabilitation tool with good predictable hearing outcome in patients with bilateral canal atresia, especially those unsuitable for canalplasty. Despite its higher cost and the need for surgical implantation, its use is justifiable in properly selected patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1072-1076
Number of pages5
JournalSingapore Medical Journal
Volume50
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Hearing
Rehabilitation
Hearing Aids
Bone and Bones
Malaysia
Osseointegration
Cellulitis
Granulation Tissue
Air
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Bilateral canal atresia
  • Bone-anchored hearing aid
  • Canal atresia
  • Congential canal atresia
  • Deafness
  • Hearing loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Mazita, A., Wan Fazlina, W. H., Abdullah, A., Goh, B. S., & Saim, L. (2009). Hearing rehabilitation in congenital canal atresia. Singapore Medical Journal, 50(11), 1072-1076.

Hearing rehabilitation in congenital canal atresia. / Mazita, Ami; Wan Fazlina, W. H.; Abdullah, Asma; Goh, Bee See; Saim, L.

In: Singapore Medical Journal, Vol. 50, No. 11, 11.2009, p. 1072-1076.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mazita, A, Wan Fazlina, WH, Abdullah, A, Goh, BS & Saim, L 2009, 'Hearing rehabilitation in congenital canal atresia', Singapore Medical Journal, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 1072-1076.
Mazita A, Wan Fazlina WH, Abdullah A, Goh BS, Saim L. Hearing rehabilitation in congenital canal atresia. Singapore Medical Journal. 2009 Nov;50(11):1072-1076.
Mazita, Ami ; Wan Fazlina, W. H. ; Abdullah, Asma ; Goh, Bee See ; Saim, L. / Hearing rehabilitation in congenital canal atresia. In: Singapore Medical Journal. 2009 ; Vol. 50, No. 11. pp. 1072-1076.
@article{aa6a5a238e5347b189c255aebe9ae1b5,
title = "Hearing rehabilitation in congenital canal atresia",
abstract = "Introduction: The purpose of this study was to review the results of our patients with congenital canal atresia after implantation of bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) . The occurrence of complications was also reviewed. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the first 16 patients who had BAHA implantation at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Malaysia. Audiometric assessment was done preoperatively and postoperatively for each patient using the standard procedure. The surgical procedure was described and its complications discussed. Results: The 16 patients consisted of 11 male and five female patients. Their mean age was 8.9 years at the time of the surgery. The main indication was bilateral canal atresia. 11 patients had implantation of BAHA performed in two stages, while the other five patients had it as a single-staged procedure. The complications that occurred were failure of osseointegration (one patient), granulation tissue overgrowth into the abutment (two patients) and cellulitis surrounding the abutment (three patients). The average preoperative unaided air conduction threshold was 64.9 dB and the average postoperative aided hearing threshold was 29.7 dB. The overall mean functional gain was 35.2 dB. Conclusion: BAHA has many advantages over the conventional hearing aid in the form of cosmesis, discomfort and hearing gain. It is a reliable hearing rehabilitation tool with good predictable hearing outcome in patients with bilateral canal atresia, especially those unsuitable for canalplasty. Despite its higher cost and the need for surgical implantation, its use is justifiable in properly selected patients.",
keywords = "Bilateral canal atresia, Bone-anchored hearing aid, Canal atresia, Congential canal atresia, Deafness, Hearing loss",
author = "Ami Mazita and {Wan Fazlina}, {W. H.} and Asma Abdullah and Goh, {Bee See} and L. Saim",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "1072--1076",
journal = "Singapore Medical Journal",
issn = "0037-5675",
publisher = "Singapore Medical Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hearing rehabilitation in congenital canal atresia

AU - Mazita, Ami

AU - Wan Fazlina, W. H.

AU - Abdullah, Asma

AU - Goh, Bee See

AU - Saim, L.

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Introduction: The purpose of this study was to review the results of our patients with congenital canal atresia after implantation of bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) . The occurrence of complications was also reviewed. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the first 16 patients who had BAHA implantation at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Malaysia. Audiometric assessment was done preoperatively and postoperatively for each patient using the standard procedure. The surgical procedure was described and its complications discussed. Results: The 16 patients consisted of 11 male and five female patients. Their mean age was 8.9 years at the time of the surgery. The main indication was bilateral canal atresia. 11 patients had implantation of BAHA performed in two stages, while the other five patients had it as a single-staged procedure. The complications that occurred were failure of osseointegration (one patient), granulation tissue overgrowth into the abutment (two patients) and cellulitis surrounding the abutment (three patients). The average preoperative unaided air conduction threshold was 64.9 dB and the average postoperative aided hearing threshold was 29.7 dB. The overall mean functional gain was 35.2 dB. Conclusion: BAHA has many advantages over the conventional hearing aid in the form of cosmesis, discomfort and hearing gain. It is a reliable hearing rehabilitation tool with good predictable hearing outcome in patients with bilateral canal atresia, especially those unsuitable for canalplasty. Despite its higher cost and the need for surgical implantation, its use is justifiable in properly selected patients.

AB - Introduction: The purpose of this study was to review the results of our patients with congenital canal atresia after implantation of bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) . The occurrence of complications was also reviewed. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the first 16 patients who had BAHA implantation at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Malaysia. Audiometric assessment was done preoperatively and postoperatively for each patient using the standard procedure. The surgical procedure was described and its complications discussed. Results: The 16 patients consisted of 11 male and five female patients. Their mean age was 8.9 years at the time of the surgery. The main indication was bilateral canal atresia. 11 patients had implantation of BAHA performed in two stages, while the other five patients had it as a single-staged procedure. The complications that occurred were failure of osseointegration (one patient), granulation tissue overgrowth into the abutment (two patients) and cellulitis surrounding the abutment (three patients). The average preoperative unaided air conduction threshold was 64.9 dB and the average postoperative aided hearing threshold was 29.7 dB. The overall mean functional gain was 35.2 dB. Conclusion: BAHA has many advantages over the conventional hearing aid in the form of cosmesis, discomfort and hearing gain. It is a reliable hearing rehabilitation tool with good predictable hearing outcome in patients with bilateral canal atresia, especially those unsuitable for canalplasty. Despite its higher cost and the need for surgical implantation, its use is justifiable in properly selected patients.

KW - Bilateral canal atresia

KW - Bone-anchored hearing aid

KW - Canal atresia

KW - Congential canal atresia

KW - Deafness

KW - Hearing loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76649091919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76649091919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19960162

AN - SCOPUS:76649091919

VL - 50

SP - 1072

EP - 1076

JO - Singapore Medical Journal

JF - Singapore Medical Journal

SN - 0037-5675

IS - 11

ER -