Health system reform from the people's point of view: Development of reliable and valid questionnaire

Saad Ahmed Ali Jadoo, Syed Mohamed Al-Junid Syed Junid, Seher Nur Sulku, Sami Abdo Radman Al-Dubai, Sharifa Ezat Wan Puteh, Zafar Ahmed, Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf, Saperi Sulong, Amrizal Muhammad Nur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Health system reform has been a major concern for different countries. The aim of this research was to develop a reliable and valid questionnaire suitable to assess the consequences of health reform process from people's perspective. An extensive literature review used to extract a set of statements as possible indicators for health system reform. Expert panel used to determine the content validity rate (CVR) and the content validity index (CVI). The first version produced in Turkish language and pre-piloted with 20 heads of household. Qualified committee used to translate the Turkish version to English version. Group of eighteen academics and graduate students recruited to tests both versions for parallel test validity. The construct validity of the questionnaire was determined using principal components analysis with Varimax rotation method (PCA). Internal consistency and questionnaire's reliability were calculated by Cronbach's alpha and the test-retest reliability test. A 17- items questionnaire was developed through the qualitative phase. The Bartlett's test was significant (p < 0.001), and the KMO value (0.842) showed that using principal component analysis (PCA) was suitable. Eigenvalues equal or higher than 1 were considered significant and chosen for interpretation. By PCA, 4 factors were extracted (accessibility, attitude and preference, quality of care and availability of resources) that jointly accounted for 85.2% of observed variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient showed excellent internal consistency (alpha=0.97), and test-retest of the scale with 2-weeks intervals indicated an appropriate stability for the scale (Intra-class coefficient = 0.96). The findings showed that the designed questionnaire was valid and reliable and can be used easily to assess the consequences of health reform process by comparing the situation before and after the reform from people's perspective.

Original languageEnglish
JournalMalaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine
Volume13
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Principal Component Analysis
Health
Quality of Health Care
Reproducibility of Results
Language
Surveys and Questionnaires
Students
Research

Keywords

  • Health reform
  • Reliability
  • Turkey
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Health system reform from the people's point of view : Development of reliable and valid questionnaire. / Jadoo, Saad Ahmed Ali; Syed Junid, Syed Mohamed Al-Junid; Sulku, Seher Nur; Al-Dubai, Sami Abdo Radman; Wan Puteh, Sharifa Ezat; Ahmed, Zafar; Abdul Manaf, Mohd Rizal; Sulong, Saperi; Nur, Amrizal Muhammad.

In: Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{badc80a421544f3181ec169b52f6f7d4,
title = "Health system reform from the people's point of view: Development of reliable and valid questionnaire",
abstract = "Health system reform has been a major concern for different countries. The aim of this research was to develop a reliable and valid questionnaire suitable to assess the consequences of health reform process from people's perspective. An extensive literature review used to extract a set of statements as possible indicators for health system reform. Expert panel used to determine the content validity rate (CVR) and the content validity index (CVI). The first version produced in Turkish language and pre-piloted with 20 heads of household. Qualified committee used to translate the Turkish version to English version. Group of eighteen academics and graduate students recruited to tests both versions for parallel test validity. The construct validity of the questionnaire was determined using principal components analysis with Varimax rotation method (PCA). Internal consistency and questionnaire's reliability were calculated by Cronbach's alpha and the test-retest reliability test. A 17- items questionnaire was developed through the qualitative phase. The Bartlett's test was significant (p < 0.001), and the KMO value (0.842) showed that using principal component analysis (PCA) was suitable. Eigenvalues equal or higher than 1 were considered significant and chosen for interpretation. By PCA, 4 factors were extracted (accessibility, attitude and preference, quality of care and availability of resources) that jointly accounted for 85.2{\%} of observed variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient showed excellent internal consistency (alpha=0.97), and test-retest of the scale with 2-weeks intervals indicated an appropriate stability for the scale (Intra-class coefficient = 0.96). The findings showed that the designed questionnaire was valid and reliable and can be used easily to assess the consequences of health reform process by comparing the situation before and after the reform from people's perspective.",
keywords = "Health reform, Reliability, Turkey, Validity",
author = "Jadoo, {Saad Ahmed Ali} and {Syed Junid}, {Syed Mohamed Al-Junid} and Sulku, {Seher Nur} and Al-Dubai, {Sami Abdo Radman} and {Wan Puteh}, {Sharifa Ezat} and Zafar Ahmed and {Abdul Manaf}, {Mohd Rizal} and Saperi Sulong and Nur, {Amrizal Muhammad}",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine",
issn = "1675-0306",
publisher = "Malaysian Public Health Physicians' Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health system reform from the people's point of view

T2 - Development of reliable and valid questionnaire

AU - Jadoo, Saad Ahmed Ali

AU - Syed Junid, Syed Mohamed Al-Junid

AU - Sulku, Seher Nur

AU - Al-Dubai, Sami Abdo Radman

AU - Wan Puteh, Sharifa Ezat

AU - Ahmed, Zafar

AU - Abdul Manaf, Mohd Rizal

AU - Sulong, Saperi

AU - Nur, Amrizal Muhammad

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Health system reform has been a major concern for different countries. The aim of this research was to develop a reliable and valid questionnaire suitable to assess the consequences of health reform process from people's perspective. An extensive literature review used to extract a set of statements as possible indicators for health system reform. Expert panel used to determine the content validity rate (CVR) and the content validity index (CVI). The first version produced in Turkish language and pre-piloted with 20 heads of household. Qualified committee used to translate the Turkish version to English version. Group of eighteen academics and graduate students recruited to tests both versions for parallel test validity. The construct validity of the questionnaire was determined using principal components analysis with Varimax rotation method (PCA). Internal consistency and questionnaire's reliability were calculated by Cronbach's alpha and the test-retest reliability test. A 17- items questionnaire was developed through the qualitative phase. The Bartlett's test was significant (p < 0.001), and the KMO value (0.842) showed that using principal component analysis (PCA) was suitable. Eigenvalues equal or higher than 1 were considered significant and chosen for interpretation. By PCA, 4 factors were extracted (accessibility, attitude and preference, quality of care and availability of resources) that jointly accounted for 85.2% of observed variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient showed excellent internal consistency (alpha=0.97), and test-retest of the scale with 2-weeks intervals indicated an appropriate stability for the scale (Intra-class coefficient = 0.96). The findings showed that the designed questionnaire was valid and reliable and can be used easily to assess the consequences of health reform process by comparing the situation before and after the reform from people's perspective.

AB - Health system reform has been a major concern for different countries. The aim of this research was to develop a reliable and valid questionnaire suitable to assess the consequences of health reform process from people's perspective. An extensive literature review used to extract a set of statements as possible indicators for health system reform. Expert panel used to determine the content validity rate (CVR) and the content validity index (CVI). The first version produced in Turkish language and pre-piloted with 20 heads of household. Qualified committee used to translate the Turkish version to English version. Group of eighteen academics and graduate students recruited to tests both versions for parallel test validity. The construct validity of the questionnaire was determined using principal components analysis with Varimax rotation method (PCA). Internal consistency and questionnaire's reliability were calculated by Cronbach's alpha and the test-retest reliability test. A 17- items questionnaire was developed through the qualitative phase. The Bartlett's test was significant (p < 0.001), and the KMO value (0.842) showed that using principal component analysis (PCA) was suitable. Eigenvalues equal or higher than 1 were considered significant and chosen for interpretation. By PCA, 4 factors were extracted (accessibility, attitude and preference, quality of care and availability of resources) that jointly accounted for 85.2% of observed variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient showed excellent internal consistency (alpha=0.97), and test-retest of the scale with 2-weeks intervals indicated an appropriate stability for the scale (Intra-class coefficient = 0.96). The findings showed that the designed questionnaire was valid and reliable and can be used easily to assess the consequences of health reform process by comparing the situation before and after the reform from people's perspective.

KW - Health reform

KW - Reliability

KW - Turkey

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893512048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893512048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893512048

VL - 13

JO - Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine

JF - Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine

SN - 1675-0306

IS - 2

ER -