Governance structures, ethnicity, and audit fees of Malaysian listed firms

Puan Yatim, Pamela Kent, Peter Clarkson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

111 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the association between external audit fees, and board and audit committee characteristics of 736 Malaysian listed firms. It is hypothesised that good corporate governance practices reduce auditors' risk assessments, resulting in lower audit fees. Drawing on the existence of a clearly identifiable ethnic domination of board membership and ownership of Malaysian listed firms, the study also posits that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees because of their weaker governance practices. Design/methodology/approach - This study employs a cross-sectional analysis of 736 firms listed on the Bursa Malaysia for the financial year ending in 2003. Multiple regression analysis is used to estimate the relationships proposed in the hypotheses. Findings - Overall, the results of this study reveal that external audit fees are positively and significantly related to board independence, audit committee expertise, and the frequency of audit committee meetings. The study also finds a strong negative association between external audit fees and Bumiputera-owned firms. An additional analysis into the internal governance structures of firms in the sample show that Bumiputera firms practice more favourable corporate governance practices compared to their non-Bumiputera counterparts. Originality/value - This study is a unique contribution in that it provides data on corporate governance practices in Malaysia for a large sample in the period after the corporate governance reforms taken by Malaysian capital market regulators and participants. Previous studies have shown that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees than non-Bumiputera-controlled firms. These studies have not tested theoretical explanations for this fee differential.Atheoretical explanation provided in the current study is that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees than non-Bumiputera-controlled firms partially because of differences in corporate governance practices. The study finds conflicting results with previous research suggesting that corporate governance practices have changed in Malaysia since the amendments of Bursa Malaysia Listing Requirements, 2001.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)757-782
Number of pages26
JournalManagerial Auditing Journal
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Ethnic groups
Governance structure
Audit fees
Corporate governance
Malaysia
External audit
Audit committee
Non-audit fees
Amendments
Cross-sectional analysis
Multiple regression analysis
Internal governance
Domination
Capital markets
Ownership
Board independence
Auditors
Board committees
Risk assessment
Corporate governance reform

Keywords

  • Audit committees
  • Auditor's fees
  • Boards of directors
  • Corporate governance
  • Malaysia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Governance structures, ethnicity, and audit fees of Malaysian listed firms. / Yatim, Puan; Kent, Pamela; Clarkson, Peter.

In: Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21, No. 7, 2006, p. 757-782.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yatim, Puan ; Kent, Pamela ; Clarkson, Peter. / Governance structures, ethnicity, and audit fees of Malaysian listed firms. In: Managerial Auditing Journal. 2006 ; Vol. 21, No. 7. pp. 757-782.
@article{e8df372bdc5546ad9a4eb9b1ada24d88,
title = "Governance structures, ethnicity, and audit fees of Malaysian listed firms",
abstract = "Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the association between external audit fees, and board and audit committee characteristics of 736 Malaysian listed firms. It is hypothesised that good corporate governance practices reduce auditors' risk assessments, resulting in lower audit fees. Drawing on the existence of a clearly identifiable ethnic domination of board membership and ownership of Malaysian listed firms, the study also posits that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees because of their weaker governance practices. Design/methodology/approach - This study employs a cross-sectional analysis of 736 firms listed on the Bursa Malaysia for the financial year ending in 2003. Multiple regression analysis is used to estimate the relationships proposed in the hypotheses. Findings - Overall, the results of this study reveal that external audit fees are positively and significantly related to board independence, audit committee expertise, and the frequency of audit committee meetings. The study also finds a strong negative association between external audit fees and Bumiputera-owned firms. An additional analysis into the internal governance structures of firms in the sample show that Bumiputera firms practice more favourable corporate governance practices compared to their non-Bumiputera counterparts. Originality/value - This study is a unique contribution in that it provides data on corporate governance practices in Malaysia for a large sample in the period after the corporate governance reforms taken by Malaysian capital market regulators and participants. Previous studies have shown that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees than non-Bumiputera-controlled firms. These studies have not tested theoretical explanations for this fee differential.Atheoretical explanation provided in the current study is that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees than non-Bumiputera-controlled firms partially because of differences in corporate governance practices. The study finds conflicting results with previous research suggesting that corporate governance practices have changed in Malaysia since the amendments of Bursa Malaysia Listing Requirements, 2001.",
keywords = "Audit committees, Auditor's fees, Boards of directors, Corporate governance, Malaysia",
author = "Puan Yatim and Pamela Kent and Peter Clarkson",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1108/02686900610680530",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "757--782",
journal = "Managerial Auditing Journal",
issn = "0268-6902",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance structures, ethnicity, and audit fees of Malaysian listed firms

AU - Yatim, Puan

AU - Kent, Pamela

AU - Clarkson, Peter

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the association between external audit fees, and board and audit committee characteristics of 736 Malaysian listed firms. It is hypothesised that good corporate governance practices reduce auditors' risk assessments, resulting in lower audit fees. Drawing on the existence of a clearly identifiable ethnic domination of board membership and ownership of Malaysian listed firms, the study also posits that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees because of their weaker governance practices. Design/methodology/approach - This study employs a cross-sectional analysis of 736 firms listed on the Bursa Malaysia for the financial year ending in 2003. Multiple regression analysis is used to estimate the relationships proposed in the hypotheses. Findings - Overall, the results of this study reveal that external audit fees are positively and significantly related to board independence, audit committee expertise, and the frequency of audit committee meetings. The study also finds a strong negative association between external audit fees and Bumiputera-owned firms. An additional analysis into the internal governance structures of firms in the sample show that Bumiputera firms practice more favourable corporate governance practices compared to their non-Bumiputera counterparts. Originality/value - This study is a unique contribution in that it provides data on corporate governance practices in Malaysia for a large sample in the period after the corporate governance reforms taken by Malaysian capital market regulators and participants. Previous studies have shown that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees than non-Bumiputera-controlled firms. These studies have not tested theoretical explanations for this fee differential.Atheoretical explanation provided in the current study is that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees than non-Bumiputera-controlled firms partially because of differences in corporate governance practices. The study finds conflicting results with previous research suggesting that corporate governance practices have changed in Malaysia since the amendments of Bursa Malaysia Listing Requirements, 2001.

AB - Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the association between external audit fees, and board and audit committee characteristics of 736 Malaysian listed firms. It is hypothesised that good corporate governance practices reduce auditors' risk assessments, resulting in lower audit fees. Drawing on the existence of a clearly identifiable ethnic domination of board membership and ownership of Malaysian listed firms, the study also posits that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees because of their weaker governance practices. Design/methodology/approach - This study employs a cross-sectional analysis of 736 firms listed on the Bursa Malaysia for the financial year ending in 2003. Multiple regression analysis is used to estimate the relationships proposed in the hypotheses. Findings - Overall, the results of this study reveal that external audit fees are positively and significantly related to board independence, audit committee expertise, and the frequency of audit committee meetings. The study also finds a strong negative association between external audit fees and Bumiputera-owned firms. An additional analysis into the internal governance structures of firms in the sample show that Bumiputera firms practice more favourable corporate governance practices compared to their non-Bumiputera counterparts. Originality/value - This study is a unique contribution in that it provides data on corporate governance practices in Malaysia for a large sample in the period after the corporate governance reforms taken by Malaysian capital market regulators and participants. Previous studies have shown that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees than non-Bumiputera-controlled firms. These studies have not tested theoretical explanations for this fee differential.Atheoretical explanation provided in the current study is that Bumiputera-controlled firms pay higher audit fees than non-Bumiputera-controlled firms partially because of differences in corporate governance practices. The study finds conflicting results with previous research suggesting that corporate governance practices have changed in Malaysia since the amendments of Bursa Malaysia Listing Requirements, 2001.

KW - Audit committees

KW - Auditor's fees

KW - Boards of directors

KW - Corporate governance

KW - Malaysia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746688492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746688492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/02686900610680530

DO - 10.1108/02686900610680530

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33746688492

VL - 21

SP - 757

EP - 782

JO - Managerial Auditing Journal

JF - Managerial Auditing Journal

SN - 0268-6902

IS - 7

ER -