Functional types of lexical bundles in reading texts of Malaysian university english test: A corpus study

Christina Ong Sook Beng, Yuen Chee Keong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

It is widely claimed that many university students were found to be unprepared for the reading demands placed upon them. To provide students with an understanding of the features of the discourses they may encounter, this study investigates lexical bundles (LBs) used in the reading passages of Malaysian University English Test (MUET), a compulsory entrance examination for tertiary education. More specifically it aims to compare and contrast the functional types of LBs found in arts and science-based reading passages. A specialised corpus of MUET test papers made up of only the reading passages categorised into two main traditional disciplines; arts and science was built using WordSmith Tools Version 5. The lists of LBs of the identified disciplines were generated using WordSmith Tools Version 5. The generated data was then analysed qualitatively based on Hyland’s (2008) Functional Taxonomy. Findings revealed that although the number of LBs in both disciplines shows significant difference, many similar LBs are found. Science-based passages employ more research-based LBs whereas arts-based texts employ more participant-oriented LBs. These findings seemed to confirm that the functions of LBs are specific to particular disciplines. Hence, explicit teaching of LBs should be considered in schools and two separate sets of MUET reading tests where the first comprises of texts adopted from the scientific and technological context while the other made up of texts from the social sciences should be designed to accommodate both arts and science stream pre-university students.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-90
Number of pages14
JournalGEMA Online Journal of Language Studies
Volume15
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

university
art
science
entrance examination
student
taxonomy
social science
Lexical Bundles
Corpus Study
discourse
Teaching
school
education
Art and Science

Keywords

  • Functional types
  • Lexical bundles (LBs)
  • MUET
  • Reading test
  • Reading text

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Functional types of lexical bundles in reading texts of Malaysian university english test : A corpus study. / Beng, Christina Ong Sook; Chee Keong, Yuen.

In: GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2015, p. 77-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{72b61183da374520a9d60049d28f45b1,
title = "Functional types of lexical bundles in reading texts of Malaysian university english test: A corpus study",
abstract = "It is widely claimed that many university students were found to be unprepared for the reading demands placed upon them. To provide students with an understanding of the features of the discourses they may encounter, this study investigates lexical bundles (LBs) used in the reading passages of Malaysian University English Test (MUET), a compulsory entrance examination for tertiary education. More specifically it aims to compare and contrast the functional types of LBs found in arts and science-based reading passages. A specialised corpus of MUET test papers made up of only the reading passages categorised into two main traditional disciplines; arts and science was built using WordSmith Tools Version 5. The lists of LBs of the identified disciplines were generated using WordSmith Tools Version 5. The generated data was then analysed qualitatively based on Hyland’s (2008) Functional Taxonomy. Findings revealed that although the number of LBs in both disciplines shows significant difference, many similar LBs are found. Science-based passages employ more research-based LBs whereas arts-based texts employ more participant-oriented LBs. These findings seemed to confirm that the functions of LBs are specific to particular disciplines. Hence, explicit teaching of LBs should be considered in schools and two separate sets of MUET reading tests where the first comprises of texts adopted from the scientific and technological context while the other made up of texts from the social sciences should be designed to accommodate both arts and science stream pre-university students.",
keywords = "Functional types, Lexical bundles (LBs), MUET, Reading test, Reading text",
author = "Beng, {Christina Ong Sook} and {Chee Keong}, Yuen",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "77--90",
journal = "GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies",
issn = "1675-8021",
publisher = "Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional types of lexical bundles in reading texts of Malaysian university english test

T2 - A corpus study

AU - Beng, Christina Ong Sook

AU - Chee Keong, Yuen

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - It is widely claimed that many university students were found to be unprepared for the reading demands placed upon them. To provide students with an understanding of the features of the discourses they may encounter, this study investigates lexical bundles (LBs) used in the reading passages of Malaysian University English Test (MUET), a compulsory entrance examination for tertiary education. More specifically it aims to compare and contrast the functional types of LBs found in arts and science-based reading passages. A specialised corpus of MUET test papers made up of only the reading passages categorised into two main traditional disciplines; arts and science was built using WordSmith Tools Version 5. The lists of LBs of the identified disciplines were generated using WordSmith Tools Version 5. The generated data was then analysed qualitatively based on Hyland’s (2008) Functional Taxonomy. Findings revealed that although the number of LBs in both disciplines shows significant difference, many similar LBs are found. Science-based passages employ more research-based LBs whereas arts-based texts employ more participant-oriented LBs. These findings seemed to confirm that the functions of LBs are specific to particular disciplines. Hence, explicit teaching of LBs should be considered in schools and two separate sets of MUET reading tests where the first comprises of texts adopted from the scientific and technological context while the other made up of texts from the social sciences should be designed to accommodate both arts and science stream pre-university students.

AB - It is widely claimed that many university students were found to be unprepared for the reading demands placed upon them. To provide students with an understanding of the features of the discourses they may encounter, this study investigates lexical bundles (LBs) used in the reading passages of Malaysian University English Test (MUET), a compulsory entrance examination for tertiary education. More specifically it aims to compare and contrast the functional types of LBs found in arts and science-based reading passages. A specialised corpus of MUET test papers made up of only the reading passages categorised into two main traditional disciplines; arts and science was built using WordSmith Tools Version 5. The lists of LBs of the identified disciplines were generated using WordSmith Tools Version 5. The generated data was then analysed qualitatively based on Hyland’s (2008) Functional Taxonomy. Findings revealed that although the number of LBs in both disciplines shows significant difference, many similar LBs are found. Science-based passages employ more research-based LBs whereas arts-based texts employ more participant-oriented LBs. These findings seemed to confirm that the functions of LBs are specific to particular disciplines. Hence, explicit teaching of LBs should be considered in schools and two separate sets of MUET reading tests where the first comprises of texts adopted from the scientific and technological context while the other made up of texts from the social sciences should be designed to accommodate both arts and science stream pre-university students.

KW - Functional types

KW - Lexical bundles (LBs)

KW - MUET

KW - Reading test

KW - Reading text

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922572132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922572132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84922572132

VL - 15

SP - 77

EP - 90

JO - GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies

JF - GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies

SN - 1675-8021

IS - 1

ER -