Struktur pembiayaan dan risiko kecairan: analisis perbankan islam domestik dan asing di Malaysia

Translated title of the contribution: Financing structure and liquidity risk: Analysis of domestic and foreign islamic banks in Malaysia

Noraini Mat Yaakub, Aisyah Abdul Rahman, Ahmad Azam Sulaiman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Liquidity risk stems from the failure of a bank to meet the demand from the bank's liability to customer at an affordable cost in times of need. It mayleadto bank insolvency and could affect the stability of the financial system. The failure of banks to effectively manage the financing structure may increase default risk and eventually liquidity risk.This study investigatesand comparesthefinancing structure-liquidity risk relationships between theMalaysian domestic and foreign Islamic banks. We adopt two measures of liquidity risk, namely: liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and net stable funding ratio(NSFR). While LCR is a short-run measure of liquidity risk (30 days), NSFR is a longer term measure of liquidity risk (one year). For financing structure, we use four measures, namely, real estate financing, specialization index (SPEC), and the stability of short-term (LCC) and long-term financing structure (VART).By using static panel regression of 10 domestic and 7 foreign Islamic banks for the period of 1994-2014, the results show that financing structure of domestic Islamic bankshave significant positive relationship with LCR. Specifically, by increasing financing to property sector as well as stability of short-term financing structure (LCC), the domestic Islamic banks are exposed to short-term liquidityrisk (LCR).However, there is an inverse relationshipswith NFSRfor the case of foreign Islamic banks, inferring that by increasing financing to property sector leads to decreasing longer term foreign Islamic banks' liquidity risk (NSFR). These contradicting results could be due to the prudent strategy byforeign Islamic banks in providing financing to less risky clients. It is crucial for policy makers at macro and micro levels to consider the behavior of financing structure in improving liquidity risk management framework for Islamic banks. In addition, by looking at the trend of a bank's financing structure, investors and customerscan have a picture of a bank's liquidity risk, thus helping them to make investment and savingdecisions.

Original languageMalay
Pages (from-to)133-144
Number of pages12
JournalJurnal Ekonomi Malaysia
Volume51
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Risk analysis
Islamic financial institutions
Liquidity risk
Malaysia
Financing
Liquidity
Funding
Panel regression
Liability
Short-run
Politicians
Real estate
Bank financing
Costs
Investors
Risk management
Financial system
Insolvency
Default risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Struktur pembiayaan dan risiko kecairan : analisis perbankan islam domestik dan asing di Malaysia. / Yaakub, Noraini Mat; Abdul Rahman, Aisyah; Sulaiman, Ahmad Azam.

In: Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Vol. 51, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. 133-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{54a11ef91a754245ade3f45e6157a2b7,
title = "Struktur pembiayaan dan risiko kecairan: analisis perbankan islam domestik dan asing di Malaysia",
abstract = "Liquidity risk stems from the failure of a bank to meet the demand from the bank's liability to customer at an affordable cost in times of need. It mayleadto bank insolvency and could affect the stability of the financial system. The failure of banks to effectively manage the financing structure may increase default risk and eventually liquidity risk.This study investigatesand comparesthefinancing structure-liquidity risk relationships between theMalaysian domestic and foreign Islamic banks. We adopt two measures of liquidity risk, namely: liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and net stable funding ratio(NSFR). While LCR is a short-run measure of liquidity risk (30 days), NSFR is a longer term measure of liquidity risk (one year). For financing structure, we use four measures, namely, real estate financing, specialization index (SPEC), and the stability of short-term (LCC) and long-term financing structure (VART).By using static panel regression of 10 domestic and 7 foreign Islamic banks for the period of 1994-2014, the results show that financing structure of domestic Islamic bankshave significant positive relationship with LCR. Specifically, by increasing financing to property sector as well as stability of short-term financing structure (LCC), the domestic Islamic banks are exposed to short-term liquidityrisk (LCR).However, there is an inverse relationshipswith NFSRfor the case of foreign Islamic banks, inferring that by increasing financing to property sector leads to decreasing longer term foreign Islamic banks' liquidity risk (NSFR). These contradicting results could be due to the prudent strategy byforeign Islamic banks in providing financing to less risky clients. It is crucial for policy makers at macro and micro levels to consider the behavior of financing structure in improving liquidity risk management framework for Islamic banks. In addition, by looking at the trend of a bank's financing structure, investors and customerscan have a picture of a bank's liquidity risk, thus helping them to make investment and savingdecisions.",
keywords = "Financing structure, Islamic banks, Liquidity risk",
author = "Yaakub, {Noraini Mat} and {Abdul Rahman}, Aisyah and Sulaiman, {Ahmad Azam}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "Malay",
volume = "51",
pages = "133--144",
journal = "Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia",
issn = "0126-1962",
publisher = "Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Struktur pembiayaan dan risiko kecairan

T2 - analisis perbankan islam domestik dan asing di Malaysia

AU - Yaakub, Noraini Mat

AU - Abdul Rahman, Aisyah

AU - Sulaiman, Ahmad Azam

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Liquidity risk stems from the failure of a bank to meet the demand from the bank's liability to customer at an affordable cost in times of need. It mayleadto bank insolvency and could affect the stability of the financial system. The failure of banks to effectively manage the financing structure may increase default risk and eventually liquidity risk.This study investigatesand comparesthefinancing structure-liquidity risk relationships between theMalaysian domestic and foreign Islamic banks. We adopt two measures of liquidity risk, namely: liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and net stable funding ratio(NSFR). While LCR is a short-run measure of liquidity risk (30 days), NSFR is a longer term measure of liquidity risk (one year). For financing structure, we use four measures, namely, real estate financing, specialization index (SPEC), and the stability of short-term (LCC) and long-term financing structure (VART).By using static panel regression of 10 domestic and 7 foreign Islamic banks for the period of 1994-2014, the results show that financing structure of domestic Islamic bankshave significant positive relationship with LCR. Specifically, by increasing financing to property sector as well as stability of short-term financing structure (LCC), the domestic Islamic banks are exposed to short-term liquidityrisk (LCR).However, there is an inverse relationshipswith NFSRfor the case of foreign Islamic banks, inferring that by increasing financing to property sector leads to decreasing longer term foreign Islamic banks' liquidity risk (NSFR). These contradicting results could be due to the prudent strategy byforeign Islamic banks in providing financing to less risky clients. It is crucial for policy makers at macro and micro levels to consider the behavior of financing structure in improving liquidity risk management framework for Islamic banks. In addition, by looking at the trend of a bank's financing structure, investors and customerscan have a picture of a bank's liquidity risk, thus helping them to make investment and savingdecisions.

AB - Liquidity risk stems from the failure of a bank to meet the demand from the bank's liability to customer at an affordable cost in times of need. It mayleadto bank insolvency and could affect the stability of the financial system. The failure of banks to effectively manage the financing structure may increase default risk and eventually liquidity risk.This study investigatesand comparesthefinancing structure-liquidity risk relationships between theMalaysian domestic and foreign Islamic banks. We adopt two measures of liquidity risk, namely: liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and net stable funding ratio(NSFR). While LCR is a short-run measure of liquidity risk (30 days), NSFR is a longer term measure of liquidity risk (one year). For financing structure, we use four measures, namely, real estate financing, specialization index (SPEC), and the stability of short-term (LCC) and long-term financing structure (VART).By using static panel regression of 10 domestic and 7 foreign Islamic banks for the period of 1994-2014, the results show that financing structure of domestic Islamic bankshave significant positive relationship with LCR. Specifically, by increasing financing to property sector as well as stability of short-term financing structure (LCC), the domestic Islamic banks are exposed to short-term liquidityrisk (LCR).However, there is an inverse relationshipswith NFSRfor the case of foreign Islamic banks, inferring that by increasing financing to property sector leads to decreasing longer term foreign Islamic banks' liquidity risk (NSFR). These contradicting results could be due to the prudent strategy byforeign Islamic banks in providing financing to less risky clients. It is crucial for policy makers at macro and micro levels to consider the behavior of financing structure in improving liquidity risk management framework for Islamic banks. In addition, by looking at the trend of a bank's financing structure, investors and customerscan have a picture of a bank's liquidity risk, thus helping them to make investment and savingdecisions.

KW - Financing structure

KW - Islamic banks

KW - Liquidity risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042548596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042548596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042548596

VL - 51

SP - 133

EP - 144

JO - Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia

JF - Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia

SN - 0126-1962

IS - 2

ER -