Explaining the contradiction in China’s South China sea policy: Structural drivers and domestic imperatives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

China’s South China Sea policy in recent years has been marked by a mix of maritime assertiveness and economic-diplomatic inducement. This article argues that this contradiction is a result of both structural drivers and domestic imperatives. Structurally, the perceived opportunity after the global fi nancial crisis and later, the perceived risk of a US-led encirclement after Obama’s “rebalancing to Asia” strategy have both pushed China to take a more hard-line approach to maritime disputes. However, the necessity to avert regional backlash has, on the other hand, compelled Beijing to counteract its maritime moves with active economic and diplomatic statecraft to reassure its smaller neighbours, albeit with mixed effects. Domestically, the contradiction is rooted in the ruling Communist Party of China elites’ needs to strike a balance between their different pathways of legitimation: while nationalist legitimation necessitates China to assert its sovereign rights, performance legitimation requires it to pursue a cooperative regional strategy via the “Belt and Road Initiative” so as to preserve a stable and productive environment needed for sustained domestic growth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-186
Number of pages24
JournalChina: An International Journal
Volume15
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

structural policy
driver
legitimation
China
sovereign right
communist party
economics
elite
road
performance
Legitimation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{49edd2ceb3da4aae94151938a524060d,
title = "Explaining the contradiction in China’s South China sea policy: Structural drivers and domestic imperatives",
abstract = "China’s South China Sea policy in recent years has been marked by a mix of maritime assertiveness and economic-diplomatic inducement. This article argues that this contradiction is a result of both structural drivers and domestic imperatives. Structurally, the perceived opportunity after the global fi nancial crisis and later, the perceived risk of a US-led encirclement after Obama’s “rebalancing to Asia” strategy have both pushed China to take a more hard-line approach to maritime disputes. However, the necessity to avert regional backlash has, on the other hand, compelled Beijing to counteract its maritime moves with active economic and diplomatic statecraft to reassure its smaller neighbours, albeit with mixed effects. Domestically, the contradiction is rooted in the ruling Communist Party of China elites’ needs to strike a balance between their different pathways of legitimation: while nationalist legitimation necessitates China to assert its sovereign rights, performance legitimation requires it to pursue a cooperative regional strategy via the “Belt and Road Initiative” so as to preserve a stable and productive environment needed for sustained domestic growth.",
author = "{Cheng Chwee}, Kuik",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "163--186",
journal = "China: An International Journal",
issn = "0219-7472",
publisher = "National University of Singapore",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining the contradiction in China’s South China sea policy

T2 - Structural drivers and domestic imperatives

AU - Cheng Chwee, Kuik

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - China’s South China Sea policy in recent years has been marked by a mix of maritime assertiveness and economic-diplomatic inducement. This article argues that this contradiction is a result of both structural drivers and domestic imperatives. Structurally, the perceived opportunity after the global fi nancial crisis and later, the perceived risk of a US-led encirclement after Obama’s “rebalancing to Asia” strategy have both pushed China to take a more hard-line approach to maritime disputes. However, the necessity to avert regional backlash has, on the other hand, compelled Beijing to counteract its maritime moves with active economic and diplomatic statecraft to reassure its smaller neighbours, albeit with mixed effects. Domestically, the contradiction is rooted in the ruling Communist Party of China elites’ needs to strike a balance between their different pathways of legitimation: while nationalist legitimation necessitates China to assert its sovereign rights, performance legitimation requires it to pursue a cooperative regional strategy via the “Belt and Road Initiative” so as to preserve a stable and productive environment needed for sustained domestic growth.

AB - China’s South China Sea policy in recent years has been marked by a mix of maritime assertiveness and economic-diplomatic inducement. This article argues that this contradiction is a result of both structural drivers and domestic imperatives. Structurally, the perceived opportunity after the global fi nancial crisis and later, the perceived risk of a US-led encirclement after Obama’s “rebalancing to Asia” strategy have both pushed China to take a more hard-line approach to maritime disputes. However, the necessity to avert regional backlash has, on the other hand, compelled Beijing to counteract its maritime moves with active economic and diplomatic statecraft to reassure its smaller neighbours, albeit with mixed effects. Domestically, the contradiction is rooted in the ruling Communist Party of China elites’ needs to strike a balance between their different pathways of legitimation: while nationalist legitimation necessitates China to assert its sovereign rights, performance legitimation requires it to pursue a cooperative regional strategy via the “Belt and Road Initiative” so as to preserve a stable and productive environment needed for sustained domestic growth.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014898173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014898173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85014898173

VL - 15

SP - 163

EP - 186

JO - China: An International Journal

JF - China: An International Journal

SN - 0219-7472

IS - 1

ER -