Ethical perception of modern biotechnology

Latifah Amin, Noor Ayuni Ahmad Azlan, Hasrizul Hashim, Jamil Ahmad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Past studies have shown that successful development and commercialisation of modern biotechnology products depends heavily on public acceptance. Of the many variables studied by earlier researchers, it was found that moral acceptability was an important predictor of support for biotechnology. The purpose of this paper is to examine the ethical perception of modern biotechnology among the public in the Klang Valley region of Malaysia and to compare their ethical perception across several demographic variables. A survey was carried out using a self-constructed multi-dimensional instrument measuring the ethical perception of modern biotechnology. The respondents (n = 434) were stratified according to stakeholder groups which consisted of eleven groups: Producers, scientists, policy makers, NGOs, the media, religious scholars, university students and consumers. Results from the survey showed that the Klang Valley public did not perceive modern biotechnology as very threatening to the natural order of things (mean score 3.76) and they recognised the high benefits that modern biotechnology could provide to society (mean score 5.31). However, they also stressed that humans do not have the absolute right to modify living things (mean score 3.55) and they perceived modern biotechnology as moderately risky (mean score 4.59), whilst they had moderate confidence in regulation (mean score 4.09) and stressed the high need for proper labelling of modern biotechnology products (mean score 5.70). Background variables such as religion, race, age, education level and gender have significant effect on some of the dimensions of Malaysians' ethical perception of modern biotechnology. The research findings are useful for understanding the social construct of the ethical acceptance of modern biotechnology in a developing country.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12435-12447
Number of pages13
JournalAfrican Journal of Biotechnology
Volume10
Issue number58
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Biotechnology
biotechnology
valleys
religion
measuring devices
Malaysia
Religion
educational status
commercialization
college students
Administrative Personnel
stakeholders
Developing Countries
developing countries
demographic statistics
researchers
Research Personnel
Demography
Students
Education

Keywords

  • Ethical aspects
  • Malaysia
  • Modern biotechnology
  • Perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Ethical perception of modern biotechnology. / Amin, Latifah; Azlan, Noor Ayuni Ahmad; Hashim, Hasrizul; Ahmad, Jamil.

In: African Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 10, No. 58, 30.09.2011, p. 12435-12447.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Amin, L, Azlan, NAA, Hashim, H & Ahmad, J 2011, 'Ethical perception of modern biotechnology', African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 58, pp. 12435-12447.
Amin, Latifah ; Azlan, Noor Ayuni Ahmad ; Hashim, Hasrizul ; Ahmad, Jamil. / Ethical perception of modern biotechnology. In: African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011 ; Vol. 10, No. 58. pp. 12435-12447.
@article{c8eb8dc8434e4a39adad85197ffe9f7a,
title = "Ethical perception of modern biotechnology",
abstract = "Past studies have shown that successful development and commercialisation of modern biotechnology products depends heavily on public acceptance. Of the many variables studied by earlier researchers, it was found that moral acceptability was an important predictor of support for biotechnology. The purpose of this paper is to examine the ethical perception of modern biotechnology among the public in the Klang Valley region of Malaysia and to compare their ethical perception across several demographic variables. A survey was carried out using a self-constructed multi-dimensional instrument measuring the ethical perception of modern biotechnology. The respondents (n = 434) were stratified according to stakeholder groups which consisted of eleven groups: Producers, scientists, policy makers, NGOs, the media, religious scholars, university students and consumers. Results from the survey showed that the Klang Valley public did not perceive modern biotechnology as very threatening to the natural order of things (mean score 3.76) and they recognised the high benefits that modern biotechnology could provide to society (mean score 5.31). However, they also stressed that humans do not have the absolute right to modify living things (mean score 3.55) and they perceived modern biotechnology as moderately risky (mean score 4.59), whilst they had moderate confidence in regulation (mean score 4.09) and stressed the high need for proper labelling of modern biotechnology products (mean score 5.70). Background variables such as religion, race, age, education level and gender have significant effect on some of the dimensions of Malaysians' ethical perception of modern biotechnology. The research findings are useful for understanding the social construct of the ethical acceptance of modern biotechnology in a developing country.",
keywords = "Ethical aspects, Malaysia, Modern biotechnology, Perception",
author = "Latifah Amin and Azlan, {Noor Ayuni Ahmad} and Hasrizul Hashim and Jamil Ahmad",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "30",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "12435--12447",
journal = "African Journal of Biotechnology",
issn = "1684-5315",
publisher = "Academic Journals",
number = "58",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical perception of modern biotechnology

AU - Amin, Latifah

AU - Azlan, Noor Ayuni Ahmad

AU - Hashim, Hasrizul

AU - Ahmad, Jamil

PY - 2011/9/30

Y1 - 2011/9/30

N2 - Past studies have shown that successful development and commercialisation of modern biotechnology products depends heavily on public acceptance. Of the many variables studied by earlier researchers, it was found that moral acceptability was an important predictor of support for biotechnology. The purpose of this paper is to examine the ethical perception of modern biotechnology among the public in the Klang Valley region of Malaysia and to compare their ethical perception across several demographic variables. A survey was carried out using a self-constructed multi-dimensional instrument measuring the ethical perception of modern biotechnology. The respondents (n = 434) were stratified according to stakeholder groups which consisted of eleven groups: Producers, scientists, policy makers, NGOs, the media, religious scholars, university students and consumers. Results from the survey showed that the Klang Valley public did not perceive modern biotechnology as very threatening to the natural order of things (mean score 3.76) and they recognised the high benefits that modern biotechnology could provide to society (mean score 5.31). However, they also stressed that humans do not have the absolute right to modify living things (mean score 3.55) and they perceived modern biotechnology as moderately risky (mean score 4.59), whilst they had moderate confidence in regulation (mean score 4.09) and stressed the high need for proper labelling of modern biotechnology products (mean score 5.70). Background variables such as religion, race, age, education level and gender have significant effect on some of the dimensions of Malaysians' ethical perception of modern biotechnology. The research findings are useful for understanding the social construct of the ethical acceptance of modern biotechnology in a developing country.

AB - Past studies have shown that successful development and commercialisation of modern biotechnology products depends heavily on public acceptance. Of the many variables studied by earlier researchers, it was found that moral acceptability was an important predictor of support for biotechnology. The purpose of this paper is to examine the ethical perception of modern biotechnology among the public in the Klang Valley region of Malaysia and to compare their ethical perception across several demographic variables. A survey was carried out using a self-constructed multi-dimensional instrument measuring the ethical perception of modern biotechnology. The respondents (n = 434) were stratified according to stakeholder groups which consisted of eleven groups: Producers, scientists, policy makers, NGOs, the media, religious scholars, university students and consumers. Results from the survey showed that the Klang Valley public did not perceive modern biotechnology as very threatening to the natural order of things (mean score 3.76) and they recognised the high benefits that modern biotechnology could provide to society (mean score 5.31). However, they also stressed that humans do not have the absolute right to modify living things (mean score 3.55) and they perceived modern biotechnology as moderately risky (mean score 4.59), whilst they had moderate confidence in regulation (mean score 4.09) and stressed the high need for proper labelling of modern biotechnology products (mean score 5.70). Background variables such as religion, race, age, education level and gender have significant effect on some of the dimensions of Malaysians' ethical perception of modern biotechnology. The research findings are useful for understanding the social construct of the ethical acceptance of modern biotechnology in a developing country.

KW - Ethical aspects

KW - Malaysia

KW - Modern biotechnology

KW - Perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053350837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053350837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80053350837

VL - 10

SP - 12435

EP - 12447

JO - African Journal of Biotechnology

JF - African Journal of Biotechnology

SN - 1684-5315

IS - 58

ER -