Enhancing students' level of geometric thinking through van hiele's phase-based learning

Abdul Halim Abdullah, Effandi Zakaria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of Van Hiele's phase-based learning on students' levels of geometric thinking. Quasi-experimental design was used in this study. The six-week study was conducted in a secondary schoolinvolving 94 students and two teachers. The students were divided into two groups, with 47 in a control group and the other 47 in a treatment group. Van Hiele's Geometry Test (VHGT) was given to both groups before and after the treatment. Ten students were randomly selected to further determine their initial and final levels of geometric thinking. Wilcoxon-t tests were conducted to test the developed hypotheses. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the initial levels of geometric thinking in both groups. However, the analysis showed significant difference between the final levels of geometric thinking in both groups. Furthermore, qualitative analysis revealed that, in initial levels of geometric thinking, the majority of students in both groups obtained the first Van Hiele levels with completeacquisition, a low acquisition of level two and no acquisition of level three. In the post interview, most of the students in the control group showed an increment of geometric thinking from level one to level two, but no one in this group achieved level three. In contrast, all the students in the treatment group showed a complete acquisition of Van Hiele level one and almost all of them indicated a complete acquisition of level two. As for level three, only one student did not achieve this level, whereas the rest showed a complete and high level of acquisition. This demonstrates that Van Hiele's phase-based learning can be applied in classrooms in order to help students achieve better level of geometric thinking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4432-4446
Number of pages15
JournalIndian Journal of Science and Technology
Volume6
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

learning
Group
student
mathematics
classroom
teacher
interview

Keywords

  • Learning Geometry
  • Students' Levels of Geometric Thinking
  • Van Hiele Model
  • Van Hiele's Phase-based Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Enhancing students' level of geometric thinking through van hiele's phase-based learning. / Abdullah, Abdul Halim; Zakaria, Effandi.

In: Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 5, 05.2013, p. 4432-4446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ca7534dd79174d54a5a372b5214e184a,
title = "Enhancing students' level of geometric thinking through van hiele's phase-based learning",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of Van Hiele's phase-based learning on students' levels of geometric thinking. Quasi-experimental design was used in this study. The six-week study was conducted in a secondary schoolinvolving 94 students and two teachers. The students were divided into two groups, with 47 in a control group and the other 47 in a treatment group. Van Hiele's Geometry Test (VHGT) was given to both groups before and after the treatment. Ten students were randomly selected to further determine their initial and final levels of geometric thinking. Wilcoxon-t tests were conducted to test the developed hypotheses. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the initial levels of geometric thinking in both groups. However, the analysis showed significant difference between the final levels of geometric thinking in both groups. Furthermore, qualitative analysis revealed that, in initial levels of geometric thinking, the majority of students in both groups obtained the first Van Hiele levels with completeacquisition, a low acquisition of level two and no acquisition of level three. In the post interview, most of the students in the control group showed an increment of geometric thinking from level one to level two, but no one in this group achieved level three. In contrast, all the students in the treatment group showed a complete acquisition of Van Hiele level one and almost all of them indicated a complete acquisition of level two. As for level three, only one student did not achieve this level, whereas the rest showed a complete and high level of acquisition. This demonstrates that Van Hiele's phase-based learning can be applied in classrooms in order to help students achieve better level of geometric thinking.",
keywords = "Learning Geometry, Students' Levels of Geometric Thinking, Van Hiele Model, Van Hiele's Phase-based Learning",
author = "Abdullah, {Abdul Halim} and Effandi Zakaria",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "4432--4446",
journal = "Indian Journal of Science and Technology",
issn = "0974-6846",
publisher = "Indian Society for Education and Environment",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhancing students' level of geometric thinking through van hiele's phase-based learning

AU - Abdullah, Abdul Halim

AU - Zakaria, Effandi

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of Van Hiele's phase-based learning on students' levels of geometric thinking. Quasi-experimental design was used in this study. The six-week study was conducted in a secondary schoolinvolving 94 students and two teachers. The students were divided into two groups, with 47 in a control group and the other 47 in a treatment group. Van Hiele's Geometry Test (VHGT) was given to both groups before and after the treatment. Ten students were randomly selected to further determine their initial and final levels of geometric thinking. Wilcoxon-t tests were conducted to test the developed hypotheses. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the initial levels of geometric thinking in both groups. However, the analysis showed significant difference between the final levels of geometric thinking in both groups. Furthermore, qualitative analysis revealed that, in initial levels of geometric thinking, the majority of students in both groups obtained the first Van Hiele levels with completeacquisition, a low acquisition of level two and no acquisition of level three. In the post interview, most of the students in the control group showed an increment of geometric thinking from level one to level two, but no one in this group achieved level three. In contrast, all the students in the treatment group showed a complete acquisition of Van Hiele level one and almost all of them indicated a complete acquisition of level two. As for level three, only one student did not achieve this level, whereas the rest showed a complete and high level of acquisition. This demonstrates that Van Hiele's phase-based learning can be applied in classrooms in order to help students achieve better level of geometric thinking.

AB - The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of Van Hiele's phase-based learning on students' levels of geometric thinking. Quasi-experimental design was used in this study. The six-week study was conducted in a secondary schoolinvolving 94 students and two teachers. The students were divided into two groups, with 47 in a control group and the other 47 in a treatment group. Van Hiele's Geometry Test (VHGT) was given to both groups before and after the treatment. Ten students were randomly selected to further determine their initial and final levels of geometric thinking. Wilcoxon-t tests were conducted to test the developed hypotheses. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the initial levels of geometric thinking in both groups. However, the analysis showed significant difference between the final levels of geometric thinking in both groups. Furthermore, qualitative analysis revealed that, in initial levels of geometric thinking, the majority of students in both groups obtained the first Van Hiele levels with completeacquisition, a low acquisition of level two and no acquisition of level three. In the post interview, most of the students in the control group showed an increment of geometric thinking from level one to level two, but no one in this group achieved level three. In contrast, all the students in the treatment group showed a complete acquisition of Van Hiele level one and almost all of them indicated a complete acquisition of level two. As for level three, only one student did not achieve this level, whereas the rest showed a complete and high level of acquisition. This demonstrates that Van Hiele's phase-based learning can be applied in classrooms in order to help students achieve better level of geometric thinking.

KW - Learning Geometry

KW - Students' Levels of Geometric Thinking

KW - Van Hiele Model

KW - Van Hiele's Phase-based Learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879269863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879269863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 4432

EP - 4446

JO - Indian Journal of Science and Technology

JF - Indian Journal of Science and Technology

SN - 0974-6846

IS - 5

ER -