Effect of contrast, stimulus density, and viewing distance on multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (MSVs)

Siti N. Abdullah, Nada Aldahlawi, Yanti Rosli, Vaegan, Mei Ying Boon, Ted Maddess

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. We investigated the effects of image contrast, stimulus density, and viewing distance upon a multifocal steady-state visual evoked potential (MSV) method. Methods. Fourteen adults with normal vision (mean age = 27.0 ± 6.6 years; 6 males) participated in the study. Each of the stimulus regions of the multifocal ensembles presented a contrast modulated grating, displaying spatial and temporal frequencies that evoke the spatial frequency doubling illusion. All subjects were tested at five contrasts: 0.06, 0.11, 0.22, 0.45, and 0.89; viewed at 16, 32, and 128 cm. A multivariate linear model estimated factors for each stimulus region, recording channel, number of stimuli (9 or 17 regions), and sex; and covariates for contrast, and octaves of viewing distance, and age. Results. The responses per unit area for the 17-region display were significantly larger than for the 9-region display (P < 10-12). The contrast-response function could be described by a power law with exponent 0.068 (P < 0.008). The effect of viewing distance was small but significant: response amplitude dropped by -0.17 ± 0.03 dB per octave of viewing distance (P < 10-6), or 10% over 8 octaves. Conclusions. The response per unit area indicated that cortical folding diminishes responses to larger stimuli. Viewing distance did not greatly affect response amplitude. This suggested that we can use similar, but scaled, stimuli to study central and peripheral disease. The rapidly saturating contrast responses imply that there would be nothing lost from testing at contrasts as low as 20% given that higher, saturating contrasts might mask visual field defects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5527-5535
Number of pages9
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume53
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Visual Evoked Potentials
Masks
Visual Fields
Linear Models
Power (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of contrast, stimulus density, and viewing distance on multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (MSVs). / Abdullah, Siti N.; Aldahlawi, Nada; Rosli, Yanti; Vaegan; Boon, Mei Ying; Maddess, Ted.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 53, No. 9, 08.2012, p. 5527-5535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abdullah, Siti N. ; Aldahlawi, Nada ; Rosli, Yanti ; Vaegan ; Boon, Mei Ying ; Maddess, Ted. / Effect of contrast, stimulus density, and viewing distance on multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (MSVs). In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2012 ; Vol. 53, No. 9. pp. 5527-5535.
@article{ce4e70380eed46d6b2e511d44cc88445,
title = "Effect of contrast, stimulus density, and viewing distance on multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (MSVs)",
abstract = "Purpose. We investigated the effects of image contrast, stimulus density, and viewing distance upon a multifocal steady-state visual evoked potential (MSV) method. Methods. Fourteen adults with normal vision (mean age = 27.0 ± 6.6 years; 6 males) participated in the study. Each of the stimulus regions of the multifocal ensembles presented a contrast modulated grating, displaying spatial and temporal frequencies that evoke the spatial frequency doubling illusion. All subjects were tested at five contrasts: 0.06, 0.11, 0.22, 0.45, and 0.89; viewed at 16, 32, and 128 cm. A multivariate linear model estimated factors for each stimulus region, recording channel, number of stimuli (9 or 17 regions), and sex; and covariates for contrast, and octaves of viewing distance, and age. Results. The responses per unit area for the 17-region display were significantly larger than for the 9-region display (P < 10-12). The contrast-response function could be described by a power law with exponent 0.068 (P < 0.008). The effect of viewing distance was small but significant: response amplitude dropped by -0.17 ± 0.03 dB per octave of viewing distance (P < 10-6), or 10{\%} over 8 octaves. Conclusions. The response per unit area indicated that cortical folding diminishes responses to larger stimuli. Viewing distance did not greatly affect response amplitude. This suggested that we can use similar, but scaled, stimuli to study central and peripheral disease. The rapidly saturating contrast responses imply that there would be nothing lost from testing at contrasts as low as 20{\%} given that higher, saturating contrasts might mask visual field defects.",
author = "Abdullah, {Siti N.} and Nada Aldahlawi and Yanti Rosli and Vaegan and Boon, {Mei Ying} and Ted Maddess",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1167/iovs.11-9325",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "5527--5535",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of contrast, stimulus density, and viewing distance on multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (MSVs)

AU - Abdullah, Siti N.

AU - Aldahlawi, Nada

AU - Rosli, Yanti

AU - Vaegan,

AU - Boon, Mei Ying

AU - Maddess, Ted

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Purpose. We investigated the effects of image contrast, stimulus density, and viewing distance upon a multifocal steady-state visual evoked potential (MSV) method. Methods. Fourteen adults with normal vision (mean age = 27.0 ± 6.6 years; 6 males) participated in the study. Each of the stimulus regions of the multifocal ensembles presented a contrast modulated grating, displaying spatial and temporal frequencies that evoke the spatial frequency doubling illusion. All subjects were tested at five contrasts: 0.06, 0.11, 0.22, 0.45, and 0.89; viewed at 16, 32, and 128 cm. A multivariate linear model estimated factors for each stimulus region, recording channel, number of stimuli (9 or 17 regions), and sex; and covariates for contrast, and octaves of viewing distance, and age. Results. The responses per unit area for the 17-region display were significantly larger than for the 9-region display (P < 10-12). The contrast-response function could be described by a power law with exponent 0.068 (P < 0.008). The effect of viewing distance was small but significant: response amplitude dropped by -0.17 ± 0.03 dB per octave of viewing distance (P < 10-6), or 10% over 8 octaves. Conclusions. The response per unit area indicated that cortical folding diminishes responses to larger stimuli. Viewing distance did not greatly affect response amplitude. This suggested that we can use similar, but scaled, stimuli to study central and peripheral disease. The rapidly saturating contrast responses imply that there would be nothing lost from testing at contrasts as low as 20% given that higher, saturating contrasts might mask visual field defects.

AB - Purpose. We investigated the effects of image contrast, stimulus density, and viewing distance upon a multifocal steady-state visual evoked potential (MSV) method. Methods. Fourteen adults with normal vision (mean age = 27.0 ± 6.6 years; 6 males) participated in the study. Each of the stimulus regions of the multifocal ensembles presented a contrast modulated grating, displaying spatial and temporal frequencies that evoke the spatial frequency doubling illusion. All subjects were tested at five contrasts: 0.06, 0.11, 0.22, 0.45, and 0.89; viewed at 16, 32, and 128 cm. A multivariate linear model estimated factors for each stimulus region, recording channel, number of stimuli (9 or 17 regions), and sex; and covariates for contrast, and octaves of viewing distance, and age. Results. The responses per unit area for the 17-region display were significantly larger than for the 9-region display (P < 10-12). The contrast-response function could be described by a power law with exponent 0.068 (P < 0.008). The effect of viewing distance was small but significant: response amplitude dropped by -0.17 ± 0.03 dB per octave of viewing distance (P < 10-6), or 10% over 8 octaves. Conclusions. The response per unit area indicated that cortical folding diminishes responses to larger stimuli. Viewing distance did not greatly affect response amplitude. This suggested that we can use similar, but scaled, stimuli to study central and peripheral disease. The rapidly saturating contrast responses imply that there would be nothing lost from testing at contrasts as low as 20% given that higher, saturating contrasts might mask visual field defects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867909542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867909542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/iovs.11-9325

DO - 10.1167/iovs.11-9325

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 5527

EP - 5535

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

IS - 9

ER -