Criteria-based assessment and grading in architecture design studio

N. Utaberta, B. Hassanpour, Adi Irfan Che Ani, Azami Zaharim, Nurakmal Abdullah @ Goh Tuo Ho

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Education is a contiguous and consecutive process. Thereby learning skills and knowledge in any context, requires strong and potent academic basis. To reach this target, evaluation as a means to recognize student's learning level and making decisions for further educating steps seems essential. All the Educational systems have sort of official examination, assessment or grading policy to measure students taught amount. In the typical policy, students are told clearly about the proposed assessment program and the relative weightings of the various components and they are given timely and helpful feedback after each assessment episode. Internationally, in these decades, universities and educators have become increasingly committed to making assessment and grading more effective in promoting student learning. Appraisal methods and grading systems in studio based educating systems, such as architecture, more than other majors and fields needs attention and scrutiny. Because transmitting the success amount of solving ill-defined problems in design studios to grading symbols are more difficult than multiple choice tests and even open ended questions. The primary interest of this paper is in grading methods that claim to be criteria-based.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Conference on Engineering Education and International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies - Proceedings
Pages179-185
Number of pages7
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Event8th WSEAS International Conference on Engineering Education, EDUCATION'11, 2nd International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies 2011, WORLD-EDU'11 - Corfu Island
Duration: 14 Jul 201116 Jul 2011

Other

Other8th WSEAS International Conference on Engineering Education, EDUCATION'11, 2nd International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies 2011, WORLD-EDU'11
CityCorfu Island
Period14/7/1116/7/11

Fingerprint

grading
student
learning
weighting
educational system
symbol
educator
decision making
examination
university
evaluation
education

Keywords

  • Architecture education
  • Criteria-based assessment
  • Grading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Utaberta, N., Hassanpour, B., Che Ani, A. I., Zaharim, A., & Abdullah @ Goh Tuo Ho, N. (2011). Criteria-based assessment and grading in architecture design studio. In International Conference on Engineering Education and International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies - Proceedings (pp. 179-185)

Criteria-based assessment and grading in architecture design studio. / Utaberta, N.; Hassanpour, B.; Che Ani, Adi Irfan; Zaharim, Azami; Abdullah @ Goh Tuo Ho, Nurakmal.

International Conference on Engineering Education and International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies - Proceedings. 2011. p. 179-185.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Utaberta, N, Hassanpour, B, Che Ani, AI, Zaharim, A & Abdullah @ Goh Tuo Ho, N 2011, Criteria-based assessment and grading in architecture design studio. in International Conference on Engineering Education and International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies - Proceedings. pp. 179-185, 8th WSEAS International Conference on Engineering Education, EDUCATION'11, 2nd International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies 2011, WORLD-EDU'11, Corfu Island, 14/7/11.
Utaberta N, Hassanpour B, Che Ani AI, Zaharim A, Abdullah @ Goh Tuo Ho N. Criteria-based assessment and grading in architecture design studio. In International Conference on Engineering Education and International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies - Proceedings. 2011. p. 179-185
Utaberta, N. ; Hassanpour, B. ; Che Ani, Adi Irfan ; Zaharim, Azami ; Abdullah @ Goh Tuo Ho, Nurakmal. / Criteria-based assessment and grading in architecture design studio. International Conference on Engineering Education and International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies - Proceedings. 2011. pp. 179-185
@inproceedings{53d90d5aab5c431a9e24fd514cf6d861,
title = "Criteria-based assessment and grading in architecture design studio",
abstract = "Education is a contiguous and consecutive process. Thereby learning skills and knowledge in any context, requires strong and potent academic basis. To reach this target, evaluation as a means to recognize student's learning level and making decisions for further educating steps seems essential. All the Educational systems have sort of official examination, assessment or grading policy to measure students taught amount. In the typical policy, students are told clearly about the proposed assessment program and the relative weightings of the various components and they are given timely and helpful feedback after each assessment episode. Internationally, in these decades, universities and educators have become increasingly committed to making assessment and grading more effective in promoting student learning. Appraisal methods and grading systems in studio based educating systems, such as architecture, more than other majors and fields needs attention and scrutiny. Because transmitting the success amount of solving ill-defined problems in design studios to grading symbols are more difficult than multiple choice tests and even open ended questions. The primary interest of this paper is in grading methods that claim to be criteria-based.",
keywords = "Architecture education, Criteria-based assessment, Grading",
author = "N. Utaberta and B. Hassanpour and {Che Ani}, {Adi Irfan} and Azami Zaharim and {Abdullah @ Goh Tuo Ho}, Nurakmal",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
pages = "179--185",
booktitle = "International Conference on Engineering Education and International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies - Proceedings",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Criteria-based assessment and grading in architecture design studio

AU - Utaberta, N.

AU - Hassanpour, B.

AU - Che Ani, Adi Irfan

AU - Zaharim, Azami

AU - Abdullah @ Goh Tuo Ho, Nurakmal

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Education is a contiguous and consecutive process. Thereby learning skills and knowledge in any context, requires strong and potent academic basis. To reach this target, evaluation as a means to recognize student's learning level and making decisions for further educating steps seems essential. All the Educational systems have sort of official examination, assessment or grading policy to measure students taught amount. In the typical policy, students are told clearly about the proposed assessment program and the relative weightings of the various components and they are given timely and helpful feedback after each assessment episode. Internationally, in these decades, universities and educators have become increasingly committed to making assessment and grading more effective in promoting student learning. Appraisal methods and grading systems in studio based educating systems, such as architecture, more than other majors and fields needs attention and scrutiny. Because transmitting the success amount of solving ill-defined problems in design studios to grading symbols are more difficult than multiple choice tests and even open ended questions. The primary interest of this paper is in grading methods that claim to be criteria-based.

AB - Education is a contiguous and consecutive process. Thereby learning skills and knowledge in any context, requires strong and potent academic basis. To reach this target, evaluation as a means to recognize student's learning level and making decisions for further educating steps seems essential. All the Educational systems have sort of official examination, assessment or grading policy to measure students taught amount. In the typical policy, students are told clearly about the proposed assessment program and the relative weightings of the various components and they are given timely and helpful feedback after each assessment episode. Internationally, in these decades, universities and educators have become increasingly committed to making assessment and grading more effective in promoting student learning. Appraisal methods and grading systems in studio based educating systems, such as architecture, more than other majors and fields needs attention and scrutiny. Because transmitting the success amount of solving ill-defined problems in design studios to grading symbols are more difficult than multiple choice tests and even open ended questions. The primary interest of this paper is in grading methods that claim to be criteria-based.

KW - Architecture education

KW - Criteria-based assessment

KW - Grading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82955177104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82955177104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 179

EP - 185

BT - International Conference on Engineering Education and International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies - Proceedings

ER -