Conflict about quitting predicts the decision to stop smoking gradually or abruptly

Evidence from stop smoking clinics in Malaysia

Lei Hum Wee, Lion Shahab, Awang Bulgiba, Robert West

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the extent to which smokers attending stop-smoking clinics experience conflicting motivations about their quit attempt, whether such conflict can be understood in terms of a single dimension and if this 'conflict about quitting' differs from motivation to stop smoking and is associated with a smoker's choice of method to stop smoking (stopping gradually or abruptly). Method: Sociodemographic, smoking and quit attempt characteristics as well as measures relating to conflict about stopping smoking were recorded in a cross-sectional survey of 198 smokers attending five quit smoking clinics in Malaysia. Results: Five measures (having seriously thought about quitting before, being happy about becoming a non-smoker, being strongly motivated to stop, intending to stop smoking completely and believing in stopping for good this time) were loaded onto a single factor that could be labelled 'conflict about quitting'. The resultant scale had moderate internal reliability (Cronbach's α = .625). Most smokers exhibited conflicting motivations about stopping smoking, with over half (52.0%, 95% CI 45.1-59.1) scoring 2 or higher on the 5-point conflict scale. 'Conflict about quitting' was significantly associated with the decision to stop smoking gradually rather than abruptly controlling for other variables (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.76) and was more strongly associated with the choice of smoking cessation method than motivation to stop smoking. Conclusions: 'Conflict about quitting' can be conceptualised as a single dimension and is prevalent among smokers voluntarily attending stop-smoking clinics. The finding that smokers who display greater conflict about quitting are more likely to choose gradual cessation may explain contradictory findings in the literature regarding the effectiveness of different methods of smoking cessation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-44
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Smoking Cessation
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Malaysia
Smoking
Motivation
Smoking Cessation
Conflict (Psychology)
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Abrupt cessation
  • Conflict
  • Gradual cessation
  • Malaysia
  • Motivation
  • Smoking cessation clinics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Conflict about quitting predicts the decision to stop smoking gradually or abruptly : Evidence from stop smoking clinics in Malaysia. / Wee, Lei Hum; Shahab, Lion; Bulgiba, Awang; West, Robert.

In: Journal of Smoking Cessation, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2011, p. 37-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{21daf5f1aa944130b5f2311b6c8940db,
title = "Conflict about quitting predicts the decision to stop smoking gradually or abruptly: Evidence from stop smoking clinics in Malaysia",
abstract = "Background: Little is known about the extent to which smokers attending stop-smoking clinics experience conflicting motivations about their quit attempt, whether such conflict can be understood in terms of a single dimension and if this 'conflict about quitting' differs from motivation to stop smoking and is associated with a smoker's choice of method to stop smoking (stopping gradually or abruptly). Method: Sociodemographic, smoking and quit attempt characteristics as well as measures relating to conflict about stopping smoking were recorded in a cross-sectional survey of 198 smokers attending five quit smoking clinics in Malaysia. Results: Five measures (having seriously thought about quitting before, being happy about becoming a non-smoker, being strongly motivated to stop, intending to stop smoking completely and believing in stopping for good this time) were loaded onto a single factor that could be labelled 'conflict about quitting'. The resultant scale had moderate internal reliability (Cronbach's α = .625). Most smokers exhibited conflicting motivations about stopping smoking, with over half (52.0{\%}, 95{\%} CI 45.1-59.1) scoring 2 or higher on the 5-point conflict scale. 'Conflict about quitting' was significantly associated with the decision to stop smoking gradually rather than abruptly controlling for other variables (OR 1.36, 95{\%} CI 1.05-1.76) and was more strongly associated with the choice of smoking cessation method than motivation to stop smoking. Conclusions: 'Conflict about quitting' can be conceptualised as a single dimension and is prevalent among smokers voluntarily attending stop-smoking clinics. The finding that smokers who display greater conflict about quitting are more likely to choose gradual cessation may explain contradictory findings in the literature regarding the effectiveness of different methods of smoking cessation.",
keywords = "Abrupt cessation, Conflict, Gradual cessation, Malaysia, Motivation, Smoking cessation clinics",
author = "Wee, {Lei Hum} and Lion Shahab and Awang Bulgiba and Robert West",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1375/jsc.6.1.37",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "37--44",
journal = "Journal of Smoking Cessation",
issn = "1834-2612",
publisher = "Australian Academic Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict about quitting predicts the decision to stop smoking gradually or abruptly

T2 - Evidence from stop smoking clinics in Malaysia

AU - Wee, Lei Hum

AU - Shahab, Lion

AU - Bulgiba, Awang

AU - West, Robert

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: Little is known about the extent to which smokers attending stop-smoking clinics experience conflicting motivations about their quit attempt, whether such conflict can be understood in terms of a single dimension and if this 'conflict about quitting' differs from motivation to stop smoking and is associated with a smoker's choice of method to stop smoking (stopping gradually or abruptly). Method: Sociodemographic, smoking and quit attempt characteristics as well as measures relating to conflict about stopping smoking were recorded in a cross-sectional survey of 198 smokers attending five quit smoking clinics in Malaysia. Results: Five measures (having seriously thought about quitting before, being happy about becoming a non-smoker, being strongly motivated to stop, intending to stop smoking completely and believing in stopping for good this time) were loaded onto a single factor that could be labelled 'conflict about quitting'. The resultant scale had moderate internal reliability (Cronbach's α = .625). Most smokers exhibited conflicting motivations about stopping smoking, with over half (52.0%, 95% CI 45.1-59.1) scoring 2 or higher on the 5-point conflict scale. 'Conflict about quitting' was significantly associated with the decision to stop smoking gradually rather than abruptly controlling for other variables (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.76) and was more strongly associated with the choice of smoking cessation method than motivation to stop smoking. Conclusions: 'Conflict about quitting' can be conceptualised as a single dimension and is prevalent among smokers voluntarily attending stop-smoking clinics. The finding that smokers who display greater conflict about quitting are more likely to choose gradual cessation may explain contradictory findings in the literature regarding the effectiveness of different methods of smoking cessation.

AB - Background: Little is known about the extent to which smokers attending stop-smoking clinics experience conflicting motivations about their quit attempt, whether such conflict can be understood in terms of a single dimension and if this 'conflict about quitting' differs from motivation to stop smoking and is associated with a smoker's choice of method to stop smoking (stopping gradually or abruptly). Method: Sociodemographic, smoking and quit attempt characteristics as well as measures relating to conflict about stopping smoking were recorded in a cross-sectional survey of 198 smokers attending five quit smoking clinics in Malaysia. Results: Five measures (having seriously thought about quitting before, being happy about becoming a non-smoker, being strongly motivated to stop, intending to stop smoking completely and believing in stopping for good this time) were loaded onto a single factor that could be labelled 'conflict about quitting'. The resultant scale had moderate internal reliability (Cronbach's α = .625). Most smokers exhibited conflicting motivations about stopping smoking, with over half (52.0%, 95% CI 45.1-59.1) scoring 2 or higher on the 5-point conflict scale. 'Conflict about quitting' was significantly associated with the decision to stop smoking gradually rather than abruptly controlling for other variables (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.76) and was more strongly associated with the choice of smoking cessation method than motivation to stop smoking. Conclusions: 'Conflict about quitting' can be conceptualised as a single dimension and is prevalent among smokers voluntarily attending stop-smoking clinics. The finding that smokers who display greater conflict about quitting are more likely to choose gradual cessation may explain contradictory findings in the literature regarding the effectiveness of different methods of smoking cessation.

KW - Abrupt cessation

KW - Conflict

KW - Gradual cessation

KW - Malaysia

KW - Motivation

KW - Smoking cessation clinics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958779844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958779844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1375/jsc.6.1.37

DO - 10.1375/jsc.6.1.37

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 37

EP - 44

JO - Journal of Smoking Cessation

JF - Journal of Smoking Cessation

SN - 1834-2612

IS - 1

ER -