Comparison using different thickness of non oriented electrical steel material using FEM software

Y. Yanawati, I. Daut, N. Gomesh, S. Nor Shafiqin, Mardina Abdullah, I. Pungut

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With market condition today, the economics is such that consumers and engineers are looking for the best fit for the application at the most reasonable cost in purchasing induction motors. This paper compares the performance of torque and rotor loss for two different electrical steel thicknesses (0.35mm & 0.5mm) as designed by FEM Software. Generally, 0.35mm thickness of material can outstand 0.5mm thickness of material in terms of better performance in loss reduction. Simulation analysis shows that the 0.35mm thicknesses steel sheet has a decrement of 18.8% for the rotor loss and an increment of 5.99% efficiency as compared to that of 0.5mm steel sheet.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceeding, 2010 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development - Engineering: Innovation and Beyond, SCOReD 2010
Pages356-359
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes
Event2010 8th IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development - Engineering: Innovation and Beyond, SCOReD 2010 - Kuala Lumpur
Duration: 13 Dec 201014 Dec 2010

Other

Other2010 8th IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development - Engineering: Innovation and Beyond, SCOReD 2010
CityKuala Lumpur
Period13/12/1014/12/10

Fingerprint

Steel sheet
Finite element method
Steel
Rotors
induction
performance
engineer
Purchasing
Induction motors
efficiency
simulation
market
Torque
costs
economics
Engineers
Economics
software
Costs

Keywords

  • FEM
  • Induction motor
  • Loss-rotor cage
  • Torque

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Education

Cite this

Yanawati, Y., Daut, I., Gomesh, N., Nor Shafiqin, S., Abdullah, M., & Pungut, I. (2010). Comparison using different thickness of non oriented electrical steel material using FEM software. In Proceeding, 2010 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development - Engineering: Innovation and Beyond, SCOReD 2010 (pp. 356-359). [5704039] https://doi.org/10.1109/SCORED.2010.5704039

Comparison using different thickness of non oriented electrical steel material using FEM software. / Yanawati, Y.; Daut, I.; Gomesh, N.; Nor Shafiqin, S.; Abdullah, Mardina; Pungut, I.

Proceeding, 2010 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development - Engineering: Innovation and Beyond, SCOReD 2010. 2010. p. 356-359 5704039.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Yanawati, Y, Daut, I, Gomesh, N, Nor Shafiqin, S, Abdullah, M & Pungut, I 2010, Comparison using different thickness of non oriented electrical steel material using FEM software. in Proceeding, 2010 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development - Engineering: Innovation and Beyond, SCOReD 2010., 5704039, pp. 356-359, 2010 8th IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development - Engineering: Innovation and Beyond, SCOReD 2010, Kuala Lumpur, 13/12/10. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCORED.2010.5704039
Yanawati Y, Daut I, Gomesh N, Nor Shafiqin S, Abdullah M, Pungut I. Comparison using different thickness of non oriented electrical steel material using FEM software. In Proceeding, 2010 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development - Engineering: Innovation and Beyond, SCOReD 2010. 2010. p. 356-359. 5704039 https://doi.org/10.1109/SCORED.2010.5704039
Yanawati, Y. ; Daut, I. ; Gomesh, N. ; Nor Shafiqin, S. ; Abdullah, Mardina ; Pungut, I. / Comparison using different thickness of non oriented electrical steel material using FEM software. Proceeding, 2010 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development - Engineering: Innovation and Beyond, SCOReD 2010. 2010. pp. 356-359
@inproceedings{9703420af5434b60ab117e244d8ec41d,
title = "Comparison using different thickness of non oriented electrical steel material using FEM software",
abstract = "With market condition today, the economics is such that consumers and engineers are looking for the best fit for the application at the most reasonable cost in purchasing induction motors. This paper compares the performance of torque and rotor loss for two different electrical steel thicknesses (0.35mm & 0.5mm) as designed by FEM Software. Generally, 0.35mm thickness of material can outstand 0.5mm thickness of material in terms of better performance in loss reduction. Simulation analysis shows that the 0.35mm thicknesses steel sheet has a decrement of 18.8{\%} for the rotor loss and an increment of 5.99{\%} efficiency as compared to that of 0.5mm steel sheet.",
keywords = "FEM, Induction motor, Loss-rotor cage, Torque",
author = "Y. Yanawati and I. Daut and N. Gomesh and {Nor Shafiqin}, S. and Mardina Abdullah and I. Pungut",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1109/SCORED.2010.5704039",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781424486489",
pages = "356--359",
booktitle = "Proceeding, 2010 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development - Engineering: Innovation and Beyond, SCOReD 2010",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison using different thickness of non oriented electrical steel material using FEM software

AU - Yanawati, Y.

AU - Daut, I.

AU - Gomesh, N.

AU - Nor Shafiqin, S.

AU - Abdullah, Mardina

AU - Pungut, I.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - With market condition today, the economics is such that consumers and engineers are looking for the best fit for the application at the most reasonable cost in purchasing induction motors. This paper compares the performance of torque and rotor loss for two different electrical steel thicknesses (0.35mm & 0.5mm) as designed by FEM Software. Generally, 0.35mm thickness of material can outstand 0.5mm thickness of material in terms of better performance in loss reduction. Simulation analysis shows that the 0.35mm thicknesses steel sheet has a decrement of 18.8% for the rotor loss and an increment of 5.99% efficiency as compared to that of 0.5mm steel sheet.

AB - With market condition today, the economics is such that consumers and engineers are looking for the best fit for the application at the most reasonable cost in purchasing induction motors. This paper compares the performance of torque and rotor loss for two different electrical steel thicknesses (0.35mm & 0.5mm) as designed by FEM Software. Generally, 0.35mm thickness of material can outstand 0.5mm thickness of material in terms of better performance in loss reduction. Simulation analysis shows that the 0.35mm thicknesses steel sheet has a decrement of 18.8% for the rotor loss and an increment of 5.99% efficiency as compared to that of 0.5mm steel sheet.

KW - FEM

KW - Induction motor

KW - Loss-rotor cage

KW - Torque

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951993886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951993886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/SCORED.2010.5704039

DO - 10.1109/SCORED.2010.5704039

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781424486489

SP - 356

EP - 359

BT - Proceeding, 2010 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development - Engineering: Innovation and Beyond, SCOReD 2010

ER -