Comparison of local nusselt number for steady and pulsating circular jet at Reynolds number of 16000

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study was carried out to determine the Nusselt number at stagnation point and at radial distance away from stagnation point for steady and pulsating flow of circular air jet. A heat transfer of heated steady and pulsating air jet at frequencies of 10, 30, 50 and 70 Hz impinging on a flat aluminium plate was measured in the study. The set-up was used to measure the heat flux at the stagnation point and the local Nusselt number at radial distance away from the stagnation point. The radial distance is 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 cm away from stagnation point. The heat flux of the heated air jet impinging on the plate was measured using a heat flux microsensor located on the plate. Measurement of the heat flux was used to calculate the local heat transfer coefficient and local Nusselt number for steady air jet and for pulsating jet at Reynolds number of 16000. Results obtained show that the stagnation point Nusselt number is higher for steady jet compared to pulsating jet at all frequencies. However, local Nusselt number calculated for pulsating jet were higher than the local Nusselt number for steady jet at radial distance 4 cm and above. The higher Nusselt number obtained at localized radial positions can be due to the higher instantaneous velocity at these locations. The relationship between the Nusselt number and the radial distance for each of the pulsating frequencies were plotted. The polynomial equations used to relate these parameters were listed in the table. Pulsating frequency of 10 Hz shows the highest increases of 166% compared to steady jet Nusselt number while at 30 Hz the maximum increases is 103%, at 50 Hz the increases is at 66% and at 70 Hz the increases is at 23%. Percentage increases is higher at low pulsating frequencies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-378
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Scientific Research
Volume29
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Nusselt number
Reynolds number
Stagnation Point
Hot Temperature
heat
air
Air
Heat Flux
heat flux
Heat flux
heat transfer coefficient
Pulsatile Flow
heat transfer
aluminum
Aluminum
Impinging Jet
comparison
Heat Transfer Coefficient
Microsensors
Polynomial equation

Keywords

  • Heat transfer coefficient
  • Jet frequency
  • Nusselt number
  • Pulsating air jet
  • Reynolds number

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

@article{9e1875e9322647aa8519a6f68b8e7435,
title = "Comparison of local nusselt number for steady and pulsating circular jet at Reynolds number of 16000",
abstract = "The study was carried out to determine the Nusselt number at stagnation point and at radial distance away from stagnation point for steady and pulsating flow of circular air jet. A heat transfer of heated steady and pulsating air jet at frequencies of 10, 30, 50 and 70 Hz impinging on a flat aluminium plate was measured in the study. The set-up was used to measure the heat flux at the stagnation point and the local Nusselt number at radial distance away from the stagnation point. The radial distance is 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 cm away from stagnation point. The heat flux of the heated air jet impinging on the plate was measured using a heat flux microsensor located on the plate. Measurement of the heat flux was used to calculate the local heat transfer coefficient and local Nusselt number for steady air jet and for pulsating jet at Reynolds number of 16000. Results obtained show that the stagnation point Nusselt number is higher for steady jet compared to pulsating jet at all frequencies. However, local Nusselt number calculated for pulsating jet were higher than the local Nusselt number for steady jet at radial distance 4 cm and above. The higher Nusselt number obtained at localized radial positions can be due to the higher instantaneous velocity at these locations. The relationship between the Nusselt number and the radial distance for each of the pulsating frequencies were plotted. The polynomial equations used to relate these parameters were listed in the table. Pulsating frequency of 10 Hz shows the highest increases of 166{\%} compared to steady jet Nusselt number while at 30 Hz the maximum increases is 103{\%}, at 50 Hz the increases is at 66{\%} and at 70 Hz the increases is at 23{\%}. Percentage increases is higher at low pulsating frequencies.",
keywords = "Heat transfer coefficient, Jet frequency, Nusselt number, Pulsating air jet, Reynolds number",
author = "Rozli Zulkifli and Kamaruzzaman Sopian and Shahrir Abdullah and Takriff, {Mohd Sobri}",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "369--378",
journal = "European Journal of Scientific Research",
issn = "1450-202X",
publisher = "European Journals Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of local nusselt number for steady and pulsating circular jet at Reynolds number of 16000

AU - Zulkifli, Rozli

AU - Sopian, Kamaruzzaman

AU - Abdullah, Shahrir

AU - Takriff, Mohd Sobri

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The study was carried out to determine the Nusselt number at stagnation point and at radial distance away from stagnation point for steady and pulsating flow of circular air jet. A heat transfer of heated steady and pulsating air jet at frequencies of 10, 30, 50 and 70 Hz impinging on a flat aluminium plate was measured in the study. The set-up was used to measure the heat flux at the stagnation point and the local Nusselt number at radial distance away from the stagnation point. The radial distance is 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 cm away from stagnation point. The heat flux of the heated air jet impinging on the plate was measured using a heat flux microsensor located on the plate. Measurement of the heat flux was used to calculate the local heat transfer coefficient and local Nusselt number for steady air jet and for pulsating jet at Reynolds number of 16000. Results obtained show that the stagnation point Nusselt number is higher for steady jet compared to pulsating jet at all frequencies. However, local Nusselt number calculated for pulsating jet were higher than the local Nusselt number for steady jet at radial distance 4 cm and above. The higher Nusselt number obtained at localized radial positions can be due to the higher instantaneous velocity at these locations. The relationship between the Nusselt number and the radial distance for each of the pulsating frequencies were plotted. The polynomial equations used to relate these parameters were listed in the table. Pulsating frequency of 10 Hz shows the highest increases of 166% compared to steady jet Nusselt number while at 30 Hz the maximum increases is 103%, at 50 Hz the increases is at 66% and at 70 Hz the increases is at 23%. Percentage increases is higher at low pulsating frequencies.

AB - The study was carried out to determine the Nusselt number at stagnation point and at radial distance away from stagnation point for steady and pulsating flow of circular air jet. A heat transfer of heated steady and pulsating air jet at frequencies of 10, 30, 50 and 70 Hz impinging on a flat aluminium plate was measured in the study. The set-up was used to measure the heat flux at the stagnation point and the local Nusselt number at radial distance away from the stagnation point. The radial distance is 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 cm away from stagnation point. The heat flux of the heated air jet impinging on the plate was measured using a heat flux microsensor located on the plate. Measurement of the heat flux was used to calculate the local heat transfer coefficient and local Nusselt number for steady air jet and for pulsating jet at Reynolds number of 16000. Results obtained show that the stagnation point Nusselt number is higher for steady jet compared to pulsating jet at all frequencies. However, local Nusselt number calculated for pulsating jet were higher than the local Nusselt number for steady jet at radial distance 4 cm and above. The higher Nusselt number obtained at localized radial positions can be due to the higher instantaneous velocity at these locations. The relationship between the Nusselt number and the radial distance for each of the pulsating frequencies were plotted. The polynomial equations used to relate these parameters were listed in the table. Pulsating frequency of 10 Hz shows the highest increases of 166% compared to steady jet Nusselt number while at 30 Hz the maximum increases is 103%, at 50 Hz the increases is at 66% and at 70 Hz the increases is at 23%. Percentage increases is higher at low pulsating frequencies.

KW - Heat transfer coefficient

KW - Jet frequency

KW - Nusselt number

KW - Pulsating air jet

KW - Reynolds number

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67449088228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67449088228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 369

EP - 378

JO - European Journal of Scientific Research

JF - European Journal of Scientific Research

SN - 1450-202X

IS - 3

ER -