Comparability of Self-Reported Conscientiousness Across 21 Countries

René Mõttus, Jüri Allik, Anu Realo, Helle Pullmann, Jérôme Rossier, Gregory Zecca, Jennifer Ah-Kion, Dénis Amoussou-Yéyé, Martin Bäckström, Rasa Barkauskiene, Oumar Barry, Uma Bhowon, Fredrik Björklund, Aleksandra Bochaver, Konstantin Bochaver, Gideon P. de Bruin, Helena F. Cabrera, Sylvia Xiaohua Chen, A. Timothy Church, Daouda Dougoumalé CisséDonatien Dahourou, Xiaohang Feng, Yanjun Guan, Hyi Sung Hwang, Fazilah Idris, Marcia S. Katigbak, Peter Kuppens, Anna Kwiatkowska, Alfredas Laurinavicius, Khairul Anwar @ Johari Mastor, David Matsumoto, Rainer Riemann, Joanna Schug, Brian Simpson, Caroline Ng Tseung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In cross-national studies, mean levels of self-reported phenomena are often not congruent with more objective criteria. One prominent explanation for such findings is that people make self-report judgements in relation to culture-specific standards (often called the reference group effect), thereby undermining the cross-cultural comparability of the judgements. We employed a simple method called anchoring vignettes in order to test whether people from 21 different countries have varying standards for Conscientiousness, a Big Five personality trait that has repeatedly shown unexpected nation-level relationships with external criteria. Participants rated their own Conscientiousness and that of 30 hypothetical persons portrayed in short vignettes. The latter type of ratings was expected to reveal individual differences in standards of Conscientiousness. The vignettes were rated relatively similarly in all countries, suggesting no substantial culture-related differences in standards for Conscientiousness. Controlling for the small differences in standards did not substantially change the rankings of countries on mean self-ratings or the predictive validities of these rankings for objective criteria. These findings are not consistent with mean self-rated Conscientiousness scores being influenced by culture-specific standards. The technique of anchoring vignettes can be used in various types of studies to assess the potentially confounding effects of reference levels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-317
Number of pages15
JournalEuropean Journal of Personality
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Individuality
Self Report
Personality

Keywords

  • Aggregate personality scores
  • Anchoring vignettes
  • Cross-cultural
  • DIF
  • Reference group effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Mõttus, R., Allik, J., Realo, A., Pullmann, H., Rossier, J., Zecca, G., ... Ng Tseung, C. (2012). Comparability of Self-Reported Conscientiousness Across 21 Countries. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.840

Comparability of Self-Reported Conscientiousness Across 21 Countries. / Mõttus, René; Allik, Jüri; Realo, Anu; Pullmann, Helle; Rossier, Jérôme; Zecca, Gregory; Ah-Kion, Jennifer; Amoussou-Yéyé, Dénis; Bäckström, Martin; Barkauskiene, Rasa; Barry, Oumar; Bhowon, Uma; Björklund, Fredrik; Bochaver, Aleksandra; Bochaver, Konstantin; de Bruin, Gideon P.; Cabrera, Helena F.; Chen, Sylvia Xiaohua; Church, A. Timothy; Cissé, Daouda Dougoumalé; Dahourou, Donatien; Feng, Xiaohang; Guan, Yanjun; Hwang, Hyi Sung; Idris, Fazilah; Katigbak, Marcia S.; Kuppens, Peter; Kwiatkowska, Anna; Laurinavicius, Alfredas; Mastor, Khairul Anwar @ Johari; Matsumoto, David; Riemann, Rainer; Schug, Joanna; Simpson, Brian; Ng Tseung, Caroline.

In: European Journal of Personality, Vol. 26, No. 3, 05.2012, p. 303-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mõttus, R, Allik, J, Realo, A, Pullmann, H, Rossier, J, Zecca, G, Ah-Kion, J, Amoussou-Yéyé, D, Bäckström, M, Barkauskiene, R, Barry, O, Bhowon, U, Björklund, F, Bochaver, A, Bochaver, K, de Bruin, GP, Cabrera, HF, Chen, SX, Church, AT, Cissé, DD, Dahourou, D, Feng, X, Guan, Y, Hwang, HS, Idris, F, Katigbak, MS, Kuppens, P, Kwiatkowska, A, Laurinavicius, A, Mastor, KAJ, Matsumoto, D, Riemann, R, Schug, J, Simpson, B & Ng Tseung, C 2012, 'Comparability of Self-Reported Conscientiousness Across 21 Countries', European Journal of Personality, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.840
Mõttus R, Allik J, Realo A, Pullmann H, Rossier J, Zecca G et al. Comparability of Self-Reported Conscientiousness Across 21 Countries. European Journal of Personality. 2012 May;26(3):303-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.840
Mõttus, René ; Allik, Jüri ; Realo, Anu ; Pullmann, Helle ; Rossier, Jérôme ; Zecca, Gregory ; Ah-Kion, Jennifer ; Amoussou-Yéyé, Dénis ; Bäckström, Martin ; Barkauskiene, Rasa ; Barry, Oumar ; Bhowon, Uma ; Björklund, Fredrik ; Bochaver, Aleksandra ; Bochaver, Konstantin ; de Bruin, Gideon P. ; Cabrera, Helena F. ; Chen, Sylvia Xiaohua ; Church, A. Timothy ; Cissé, Daouda Dougoumalé ; Dahourou, Donatien ; Feng, Xiaohang ; Guan, Yanjun ; Hwang, Hyi Sung ; Idris, Fazilah ; Katigbak, Marcia S. ; Kuppens, Peter ; Kwiatkowska, Anna ; Laurinavicius, Alfredas ; Mastor, Khairul Anwar @ Johari ; Matsumoto, David ; Riemann, Rainer ; Schug, Joanna ; Simpson, Brian ; Ng Tseung, Caroline. / Comparability of Self-Reported Conscientiousness Across 21 Countries. In: European Journal of Personality. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 303-317.
@article{2c7c740ca60440cfb66fa67b407d42ca,
title = "Comparability of Self-Reported Conscientiousness Across 21 Countries",
abstract = "In cross-national studies, mean levels of self-reported phenomena are often not congruent with more objective criteria. One prominent explanation for such findings is that people make self-report judgements in relation to culture-specific standards (often called the reference group effect), thereby undermining the cross-cultural comparability of the judgements. We employed a simple method called anchoring vignettes in order to test whether people from 21 different countries have varying standards for Conscientiousness, a Big Five personality trait that has repeatedly shown unexpected nation-level relationships with external criteria. Participants rated their own Conscientiousness and that of 30 hypothetical persons portrayed in short vignettes. The latter type of ratings was expected to reveal individual differences in standards of Conscientiousness. The vignettes were rated relatively similarly in all countries, suggesting no substantial culture-related differences in standards for Conscientiousness. Controlling for the small differences in standards did not substantially change the rankings of countries on mean self-ratings or the predictive validities of these rankings for objective criteria. These findings are not consistent with mean self-rated Conscientiousness scores being influenced by culture-specific standards. The technique of anchoring vignettes can be used in various types of studies to assess the potentially confounding effects of reference levels.",
keywords = "Aggregate personality scores, Anchoring vignettes, Cross-cultural, DIF, Reference group effect",
author = "Ren{\'e} M{\~o}ttus and J{\"u}ri Allik and Anu Realo and Helle Pullmann and J{\'e}r{\^o}me Rossier and Gregory Zecca and Jennifer Ah-Kion and D{\'e}nis Amoussou-Y{\'e}y{\'e} and Martin B{\"a}ckstr{\"o}m and Rasa Barkauskiene and Oumar Barry and Uma Bhowon and Fredrik Bj{\"o}rklund and Aleksandra Bochaver and Konstantin Bochaver and {de Bruin}, {Gideon P.} and Cabrera, {Helena F.} and Chen, {Sylvia Xiaohua} and Church, {A. Timothy} and Ciss{\'e}, {Daouda Dougoumal{\'e}} and Donatien Dahourou and Xiaohang Feng and Yanjun Guan and Hwang, {Hyi Sung} and Fazilah Idris and Katigbak, {Marcia S.} and Peter Kuppens and Anna Kwiatkowska and Alfredas Laurinavicius and Mastor, {Khairul Anwar @ Johari} and David Matsumoto and Rainer Riemann and Joanna Schug and Brian Simpson and {Ng Tseung}, Caroline",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/per.840",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "303--317",
journal = "European Journal of Personality",
issn = "0890-2070",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparability of Self-Reported Conscientiousness Across 21 Countries

AU - Mõttus, René

AU - Allik, Jüri

AU - Realo, Anu

AU - Pullmann, Helle

AU - Rossier, Jérôme

AU - Zecca, Gregory

AU - Ah-Kion, Jennifer

AU - Amoussou-Yéyé, Dénis

AU - Bäckström, Martin

AU - Barkauskiene, Rasa

AU - Barry, Oumar

AU - Bhowon, Uma

AU - Björklund, Fredrik

AU - Bochaver, Aleksandra

AU - Bochaver, Konstantin

AU - de Bruin, Gideon P.

AU - Cabrera, Helena F.

AU - Chen, Sylvia Xiaohua

AU - Church, A. Timothy

AU - Cissé, Daouda Dougoumalé

AU - Dahourou, Donatien

AU - Feng, Xiaohang

AU - Guan, Yanjun

AU - Hwang, Hyi Sung

AU - Idris, Fazilah

AU - Katigbak, Marcia S.

AU - Kuppens, Peter

AU - Kwiatkowska, Anna

AU - Laurinavicius, Alfredas

AU - Mastor, Khairul Anwar @ Johari

AU - Matsumoto, David

AU - Riemann, Rainer

AU - Schug, Joanna

AU - Simpson, Brian

AU - Ng Tseung, Caroline

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - In cross-national studies, mean levels of self-reported phenomena are often not congruent with more objective criteria. One prominent explanation for such findings is that people make self-report judgements in relation to culture-specific standards (often called the reference group effect), thereby undermining the cross-cultural comparability of the judgements. We employed a simple method called anchoring vignettes in order to test whether people from 21 different countries have varying standards for Conscientiousness, a Big Five personality trait that has repeatedly shown unexpected nation-level relationships with external criteria. Participants rated their own Conscientiousness and that of 30 hypothetical persons portrayed in short vignettes. The latter type of ratings was expected to reveal individual differences in standards of Conscientiousness. The vignettes were rated relatively similarly in all countries, suggesting no substantial culture-related differences in standards for Conscientiousness. Controlling for the small differences in standards did not substantially change the rankings of countries on mean self-ratings or the predictive validities of these rankings for objective criteria. These findings are not consistent with mean self-rated Conscientiousness scores being influenced by culture-specific standards. The technique of anchoring vignettes can be used in various types of studies to assess the potentially confounding effects of reference levels.

AB - In cross-national studies, mean levels of self-reported phenomena are often not congruent with more objective criteria. One prominent explanation for such findings is that people make self-report judgements in relation to culture-specific standards (often called the reference group effect), thereby undermining the cross-cultural comparability of the judgements. We employed a simple method called anchoring vignettes in order to test whether people from 21 different countries have varying standards for Conscientiousness, a Big Five personality trait that has repeatedly shown unexpected nation-level relationships with external criteria. Participants rated their own Conscientiousness and that of 30 hypothetical persons portrayed in short vignettes. The latter type of ratings was expected to reveal individual differences in standards of Conscientiousness. The vignettes were rated relatively similarly in all countries, suggesting no substantial culture-related differences in standards for Conscientiousness. Controlling for the small differences in standards did not substantially change the rankings of countries on mean self-ratings or the predictive validities of these rankings for objective criteria. These findings are not consistent with mean self-rated Conscientiousness scores being influenced by culture-specific standards. The technique of anchoring vignettes can be used in various types of studies to assess the potentially confounding effects of reference levels.

KW - Aggregate personality scores

KW - Anchoring vignettes

KW - Cross-cultural

KW - DIF

KW - Reference group effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855646446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855646446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/per.840

DO - 10.1002/per.840

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84855646446

VL - 26

SP - 303

EP - 317

JO - European Journal of Personality

JF - European Journal of Personality

SN - 0890-2070

IS - 3

ER -