Clinical efficacy and feasibility of whey protein isolates supplementation in malnourished peritoneal dialysis patients

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical efficacy and feasibility of whey protein isolates supplementation in malnourished peritoneal dialysis patients

T2 - A multicenter, parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial

AU - Sahathevan, Sharmela

AU - Se, Chee Hee

AU - Ng, See Hoe

AU - Khor, Ban Hock

AU - Chinna, Karuthan

AU - Goh, Bak Leong

AU - Abdul Gafor, Abdul Halim

AU - Bavanandan, Sunita

AU - Ahmad, Ghazali

AU - Karupaiah, Tilakavati

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Background and aims: Poor dietary intake is commonly associated with malnutrition in the dialysis population and oral nutritional supplementation is strategized to redress dietary inadequacy. Knowledge on clinical efficacy of whey protein supplementation (WPS) as an option to treat malnutrition in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients is limited. Methods: This multicenter, parallel, open-label, randomized controlled trial investigated the clinical efficacy of WPS in 126 malnourished CAPD patients with serum albumin <40 g/L and body mass index (BMI) <24 kg/m2. Patients randomized to the intervention group (IG, n = 65) received protein powder (27.4 g) for 6 months plus dietary counseling (DC) while the control group (CG, n = 61) received DC only. Anthropometry, biochemistry, malnutrition-inflammation-score (MIS), dietary intake inclusive of dialysate calories, handgrip strength (HGS) and quality of life (QOL) were assessed at baseline and 6 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed by effect size (Cohen's d) comparisons within and between groups. Results: Seventy-four patients (n = 37 per group) completed the study. Significantly more IG patients (59.5%) achieved dietary protein intake (DPI) adequacy of 1.2 g/kg per ideal body weight (p < 0.001) compared to CG (16.2%) although difference in the adequacy of dietary energy intake between groups was non-significant (p > 0.05). A higher DPI paralleled significant increases in serum urea (mean Δ: IG = +2.39 ± 4.36 mmol/L, p = 0.002, d = 0.57 vs CG = −0.39 ± 4.59 mmol/L, p > 0.05, d = 0.07) and normalized protein catabolic rate, nPCR (mean Δ: IG = +0.11 ± 0.14 g/kg/day, p < 0.001, d = 0.63 vs CG = +0.001 ± 0.17 g/kg/day, p > 0.05, d = 0.09) for IG compared to CG patients. Although not significant, comparison for changes in post-dialysis weight (mean Δ: +0.64 ± 1.16 kg vs +0.02 ± 1.36 kg, p = 0.076, d = 0.58) and mid-arm circumference (mean Δ: +0.29 ± 0.93 cm vs −0.12 ± 0.71 cm, p = 0.079, d = 0.24) indicated trends favoring IG vs CG. Other parameters remained unaffected by treatment comparisons. CG patients had a significant decline in QOL physical component (mean Δ = −6.62 ± 16.63, p = 0.020, d = 0.47). Using changes in nPCR level as a marker of WPS intake within IG, ‘positive responders’ achieved significant improvement in weight, BMI, skinfold measures and serum urea (all p < 0.05), while such changes within ‘negative responders’ were non-significant (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: A single macronutrient approach with WPS in malnourished CAPD patients was shown to achieve DPI adequacy and improvements in weight, BMI, skin fold measures, serum urea and nPCR level. Clinical trial registry: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03367000).

AB - Background and aims: Poor dietary intake is commonly associated with malnutrition in the dialysis population and oral nutritional supplementation is strategized to redress dietary inadequacy. Knowledge on clinical efficacy of whey protein supplementation (WPS) as an option to treat malnutrition in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients is limited. Methods: This multicenter, parallel, open-label, randomized controlled trial investigated the clinical efficacy of WPS in 126 malnourished CAPD patients with serum albumin <40 g/L and body mass index (BMI) <24 kg/m2. Patients randomized to the intervention group (IG, n = 65) received protein powder (27.4 g) for 6 months plus dietary counseling (DC) while the control group (CG, n = 61) received DC only. Anthropometry, biochemistry, malnutrition-inflammation-score (MIS), dietary intake inclusive of dialysate calories, handgrip strength (HGS) and quality of life (QOL) were assessed at baseline and 6 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed by effect size (Cohen's d) comparisons within and between groups. Results: Seventy-four patients (n = 37 per group) completed the study. Significantly more IG patients (59.5%) achieved dietary protein intake (DPI) adequacy of 1.2 g/kg per ideal body weight (p < 0.001) compared to CG (16.2%) although difference in the adequacy of dietary energy intake between groups was non-significant (p > 0.05). A higher DPI paralleled significant increases in serum urea (mean Δ: IG = +2.39 ± 4.36 mmol/L, p = 0.002, d = 0.57 vs CG = −0.39 ± 4.59 mmol/L, p > 0.05, d = 0.07) and normalized protein catabolic rate, nPCR (mean Δ: IG = +0.11 ± 0.14 g/kg/day, p < 0.001, d = 0.63 vs CG = +0.001 ± 0.17 g/kg/day, p > 0.05, d = 0.09) for IG compared to CG patients. Although not significant, comparison for changes in post-dialysis weight (mean Δ: +0.64 ± 1.16 kg vs +0.02 ± 1.36 kg, p = 0.076, d = 0.58) and mid-arm circumference (mean Δ: +0.29 ± 0.93 cm vs −0.12 ± 0.71 cm, p = 0.079, d = 0.24) indicated trends favoring IG vs CG. Other parameters remained unaffected by treatment comparisons. CG patients had a significant decline in QOL physical component (mean Δ = −6.62 ± 16.63, p = 0.020, d = 0.47). Using changes in nPCR level as a marker of WPS intake within IG, ‘positive responders’ achieved significant improvement in weight, BMI, skinfold measures and serum urea (all p < 0.05), while such changes within ‘negative responders’ were non-significant (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: A single macronutrient approach with WPS in malnourished CAPD patients was shown to achieve DPI adequacy and improvements in weight, BMI, skin fold measures, serum urea and nPCR level. Clinical trial registry: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03367000).

KW - Malnutrition

KW - Nutritional status

KW - Peritoneal dialysis

KW - Protein supplementation

KW - Whey protein

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045732809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045732809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.04.002

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 68

EP - 77

JO - Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

JF - Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

SN - 2405-4577

ER -