Analyzing conflict and its management within ICT4D partnerships: an institutional logics perspective

Shahifol Arbi Ismail, Richard Heeks, Brian Nicholson, Aini Aman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Promotion and presence of partnerships have been growing within information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Yet – despite limited analytical literature on this topic – it is clear that the reality of ICT4D partnerships often undershoots the potential, with frequent reports of failure, particularly arising from conflict between partners. This paper addresses calls for more and better-conceptualized research into ICT4D partnerships, with a specific focus on understanding the roots and management of conflict in such partnerships. We use qualitative field data from a Malaysian IT “impact sourcing” public–private partnership case study, viewed through the lens of institutional logics and conflict management strategies. Analysis of three vignettes from the negotiation of the initiative shows one partner always used a competitive approach to conflict management. This led issues to remain unresolved and led the partnership arrangement to steadily loosen. The outcome was always domination of private logic over public logic. As a result, and lacking an overt advocate, welfare goals of the partnership were somewhat sidelined. Our paper contributes by showing (a) how institutional logics helps explain the outcome of ICT4D partnerships, and (b) how the conflict management strategies framework helps explain the practice of conflicting institutional logics in such partnerships.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalInformation Technology for Development
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 3 May 2017

Fingerprint

conflict management
management
information and communication technology
Lenses
conflict
Communication
domination
communication technology
promotion
information technology
welfare

Keywords

  • conflict management
  • ICT4D partnerships
  • institutional logics
  • public–private partnership

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Public Administration
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Analyzing conflict and its management within ICT4D partnerships : an institutional logics perspective. / Ismail, Shahifol Arbi; Heeks, Richard; Nicholson, Brian; Aman, Aini.

In: Information Technology for Development, 03.05.2017, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f3cf03ba7de1463db5ee406102d0a2a1,
title = "Analyzing conflict and its management within ICT4D partnerships: an institutional logics perspective",
abstract = "Promotion and presence of partnerships have been growing within information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Yet – despite limited analytical literature on this topic – it is clear that the reality of ICT4D partnerships often undershoots the potential, with frequent reports of failure, particularly arising from conflict between partners. This paper addresses calls for more and better-conceptualized research into ICT4D partnerships, with a specific focus on understanding the roots and management of conflict in such partnerships. We use qualitative field data from a Malaysian IT “impact sourcing” public–private partnership case study, viewed through the lens of institutional logics and conflict management strategies. Analysis of three vignettes from the negotiation of the initiative shows one partner always used a competitive approach to conflict management. This led issues to remain unresolved and led the partnership arrangement to steadily loosen. The outcome was always domination of private logic over public logic. As a result, and lacking an overt advocate, welfare goals of the partnership were somewhat sidelined. Our paper contributes by showing (a) how institutional logics helps explain the outcome of ICT4D partnerships, and (b) how the conflict management strategies framework helps explain the practice of conflicting institutional logics in such partnerships.",
keywords = "conflict management, ICT4D partnerships, institutional logics, public–private partnership",
author = "Ismail, {Shahifol Arbi} and Richard Heeks and Brian Nicholson and Aini Aman",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/02681102.2017.1320962",
language = "English",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "Information Technology for Development",
issn = "0268-1102",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analyzing conflict and its management within ICT4D partnerships

T2 - an institutional logics perspective

AU - Ismail, Shahifol Arbi

AU - Heeks, Richard

AU - Nicholson, Brian

AU - Aman, Aini

PY - 2017/5/3

Y1 - 2017/5/3

N2 - Promotion and presence of partnerships have been growing within information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Yet – despite limited analytical literature on this topic – it is clear that the reality of ICT4D partnerships often undershoots the potential, with frequent reports of failure, particularly arising from conflict between partners. This paper addresses calls for more and better-conceptualized research into ICT4D partnerships, with a specific focus on understanding the roots and management of conflict in such partnerships. We use qualitative field data from a Malaysian IT “impact sourcing” public–private partnership case study, viewed through the lens of institutional logics and conflict management strategies. Analysis of three vignettes from the negotiation of the initiative shows one partner always used a competitive approach to conflict management. This led issues to remain unresolved and led the partnership arrangement to steadily loosen. The outcome was always domination of private logic over public logic. As a result, and lacking an overt advocate, welfare goals of the partnership were somewhat sidelined. Our paper contributes by showing (a) how institutional logics helps explain the outcome of ICT4D partnerships, and (b) how the conflict management strategies framework helps explain the practice of conflicting institutional logics in such partnerships.

AB - Promotion and presence of partnerships have been growing within information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Yet – despite limited analytical literature on this topic – it is clear that the reality of ICT4D partnerships often undershoots the potential, with frequent reports of failure, particularly arising from conflict between partners. This paper addresses calls for more and better-conceptualized research into ICT4D partnerships, with a specific focus on understanding the roots and management of conflict in such partnerships. We use qualitative field data from a Malaysian IT “impact sourcing” public–private partnership case study, viewed through the lens of institutional logics and conflict management strategies. Analysis of three vignettes from the negotiation of the initiative shows one partner always used a competitive approach to conflict management. This led issues to remain unresolved and led the partnership arrangement to steadily loosen. The outcome was always domination of private logic over public logic. As a result, and lacking an overt advocate, welfare goals of the partnership were somewhat sidelined. Our paper contributes by showing (a) how institutional logics helps explain the outcome of ICT4D partnerships, and (b) how the conflict management strategies framework helps explain the practice of conflicting institutional logics in such partnerships.

KW - conflict management

KW - ICT4D partnerships

KW - institutional logics

KW - public–private partnership

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018191401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018191401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02681102.2017.1320962

DO - 10.1080/02681102.2017.1320962

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018191401

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Information Technology for Development

JF - Information Technology for Development

SN - 0268-1102

ER -