An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018

Stefanie Vandevijvere, Simon Barquera, Gabriela Caceres, Camila Corvalan, Tilakavati Karupaiah, Maria Fernanda Kroker-Lobos, Mary L'Abbé, See Hoe Ng, Sirinya Phulkerd, Manuel Ramirez-Zea, Salome A. Rebello, Marcela Reyes, Gary Sacks, Carmen María Sánchez Nóchez, Karina Sanchez, David Sanders, Mark Spires, Rina Swart, Viroj Tangcharoensathien, Zoey Tay & 7 others Anna Taylor, Lizbeth Tolentino-Mayo, Rob Van Dam, Lana Vanderlee, Fiona Watson, Clare Whitton, Boyd Swinburn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) aims to assess the extent of implementation of recommended food environment policies by governments compared with international best practices and prioritize actions to fill implementation gaps. The Food-EPI was applied in 11 countries across six regions (2015-2018). National public health nutrition panels (n = 11-101 experts) rated the extent of implementation of 47 policy and infrastructure support good practice indicators by their government(s) against best practices, using an evidence document verified by government officials. Experts identified and prioritized actions to address implementation gaps. The proportion of indicators at “very low if any,” “low,” “medium,” and “high” implementation, overall Food-EPI scores, and priority action areas were compared across countries. Inter-rater reliability was good (GwetAC2 = 0.6-0.8). Chile had the highest proportion of policies (13%) rated at “high” implementation, while Guatemala had the highest proportion of policies (83%) rated at “very low if any” implementation. The overall Food-EPI score was “medium” for Australia, England, Chile, and Singapore, while “very low if any” for Guatemala. Policy areas most frequently prioritized included taxes on unhealthy foods, restricting unhealthy food promotion and front-of-pack labelling. The Food-EPI was found to be a robust tool and process to benchmark governments' progress to create healthy food environments.

Original languageEnglish
JournalObesity Reviews
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Nutrition Policy
Federal Government
Guatemala
Chile
Practice Guidelines
Food
Taxes
Singapore
England
Public Health

Keywords

  • accountability
  • benchmarking
  • food environments
  • policy implementation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018. / Vandevijvere, Stefanie; Barquera, Simon; Caceres, Gabriela; Corvalan, Camila; Karupaiah, Tilakavati; Kroker-Lobos, Maria Fernanda; L'Abbé, Mary; Ng, See Hoe; Phulkerd, Sirinya; Ramirez-Zea, Manuel; Rebello, Salome A.; Reyes, Marcela; Sacks, Gary; Sánchez Nóchez, Carmen María; Sanchez, Karina; Sanders, David; Spires, Mark; Swart, Rina; Tangcharoensathien, Viroj; Tay, Zoey; Taylor, Anna; Tolentino-Mayo, Lizbeth; Van Dam, Rob; Vanderlee, Lana; Watson, Fiona; Whitton, Clare; Swinburn, Boyd.

In: Obesity Reviews, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vandevijvere, S, Barquera, S, Caceres, G, Corvalan, C, Karupaiah, T, Kroker-Lobos, MF, L'Abbé, M, Ng, SH, Phulkerd, S, Ramirez-Zea, M, Rebello, SA, Reyes, M, Sacks, G, Sánchez Nóchez, CM, Sanchez, K, Sanders, D, Spires, M, Swart, R, Tangcharoensathien, V, Tay, Z, Taylor, A, Tolentino-Mayo, L, Van Dam, R, Vanderlee, L, Watson, F, Whitton, C & Swinburn, B 2019, 'An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018', Obesity Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12819
Vandevijvere, Stefanie ; Barquera, Simon ; Caceres, Gabriela ; Corvalan, Camila ; Karupaiah, Tilakavati ; Kroker-Lobos, Maria Fernanda ; L'Abbé, Mary ; Ng, See Hoe ; Phulkerd, Sirinya ; Ramirez-Zea, Manuel ; Rebello, Salome A. ; Reyes, Marcela ; Sacks, Gary ; Sánchez Nóchez, Carmen María ; Sanchez, Karina ; Sanders, David ; Spires, Mark ; Swart, Rina ; Tangcharoensathien, Viroj ; Tay, Zoey ; Taylor, Anna ; Tolentino-Mayo, Lizbeth ; Van Dam, Rob ; Vanderlee, Lana ; Watson, Fiona ; Whitton, Clare ; Swinburn, Boyd. / An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018. In: Obesity Reviews. 2019.
@article{e7b3cedccf0249d7a903366bc486c588,
title = "An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018",
abstract = "The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) aims to assess the extent of implementation of recommended food environment policies by governments compared with international best practices and prioritize actions to fill implementation gaps. The Food-EPI was applied in 11 countries across six regions (2015-2018). National public health nutrition panels (n = 11-101 experts) rated the extent of implementation of 47 policy and infrastructure support good practice indicators by their government(s) against best practices, using an evidence document verified by government officials. Experts identified and prioritized actions to address implementation gaps. The proportion of indicators at “very low if any,” “low,” “medium,” and “high” implementation, overall Food-EPI scores, and priority action areas were compared across countries. Inter-rater reliability was good (GwetAC2 = 0.6-0.8). Chile had the highest proportion of policies (13{\%}) rated at “high” implementation, while Guatemala had the highest proportion of policies (83{\%}) rated at “very low if any” implementation. The overall Food-EPI score was “medium” for Australia, England, Chile, and Singapore, while “very low if any” for Guatemala. Policy areas most frequently prioritized included taxes on unhealthy foods, restricting unhealthy food promotion and front-of-pack labelling. The Food-EPI was found to be a robust tool and process to benchmark governments' progress to create healthy food environments.",
keywords = "accountability, benchmarking, food environments, policy implementation",
author = "Stefanie Vandevijvere and Simon Barquera and Gabriela Caceres and Camila Corvalan and Tilakavati Karupaiah and Kroker-Lobos, {Maria Fernanda} and Mary L'Abb{\'e} and Ng, {See Hoe} and Sirinya Phulkerd and Manuel Ramirez-Zea and Rebello, {Salome A.} and Marcela Reyes and Gary Sacks and {S{\'a}nchez N{\'o}chez}, {Carmen Mar{\'i}a} and Karina Sanchez and David Sanders and Mark Spires and Rina Swart and Viroj Tangcharoensathien and Zoey Tay and Anna Taylor and Lizbeth Tolentino-Mayo and {Van Dam}, Rob and Lana Vanderlee and Fiona Watson and Clare Whitton and Boyd Swinburn",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/obr.12819",
language = "English",
journal = "Obesity Reviews",
issn = "1467-7881",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018

AU - Vandevijvere, Stefanie

AU - Barquera, Simon

AU - Caceres, Gabriela

AU - Corvalan, Camila

AU - Karupaiah, Tilakavati

AU - Kroker-Lobos, Maria Fernanda

AU - L'Abbé, Mary

AU - Ng, See Hoe

AU - Phulkerd, Sirinya

AU - Ramirez-Zea, Manuel

AU - Rebello, Salome A.

AU - Reyes, Marcela

AU - Sacks, Gary

AU - Sánchez Nóchez, Carmen María

AU - Sanchez, Karina

AU - Sanders, David

AU - Spires, Mark

AU - Swart, Rina

AU - Tangcharoensathien, Viroj

AU - Tay, Zoey

AU - Taylor, Anna

AU - Tolentino-Mayo, Lizbeth

AU - Van Dam, Rob

AU - Vanderlee, Lana

AU - Watson, Fiona

AU - Whitton, Clare

AU - Swinburn, Boyd

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) aims to assess the extent of implementation of recommended food environment policies by governments compared with international best practices and prioritize actions to fill implementation gaps. The Food-EPI was applied in 11 countries across six regions (2015-2018). National public health nutrition panels (n = 11-101 experts) rated the extent of implementation of 47 policy and infrastructure support good practice indicators by their government(s) against best practices, using an evidence document verified by government officials. Experts identified and prioritized actions to address implementation gaps. The proportion of indicators at “very low if any,” “low,” “medium,” and “high” implementation, overall Food-EPI scores, and priority action areas were compared across countries. Inter-rater reliability was good (GwetAC2 = 0.6-0.8). Chile had the highest proportion of policies (13%) rated at “high” implementation, while Guatemala had the highest proportion of policies (83%) rated at “very low if any” implementation. The overall Food-EPI score was “medium” for Australia, England, Chile, and Singapore, while “very low if any” for Guatemala. Policy areas most frequently prioritized included taxes on unhealthy foods, restricting unhealthy food promotion and front-of-pack labelling. The Food-EPI was found to be a robust tool and process to benchmark governments' progress to create healthy food environments.

AB - The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) aims to assess the extent of implementation of recommended food environment policies by governments compared with international best practices and prioritize actions to fill implementation gaps. The Food-EPI was applied in 11 countries across six regions (2015-2018). National public health nutrition panels (n = 11-101 experts) rated the extent of implementation of 47 policy and infrastructure support good practice indicators by their government(s) against best practices, using an evidence document verified by government officials. Experts identified and prioritized actions to address implementation gaps. The proportion of indicators at “very low if any,” “low,” “medium,” and “high” implementation, overall Food-EPI scores, and priority action areas were compared across countries. Inter-rater reliability was good (GwetAC2 = 0.6-0.8). Chile had the highest proportion of policies (13%) rated at “high” implementation, while Guatemala had the highest proportion of policies (83%) rated at “very low if any” implementation. The overall Food-EPI score was “medium” for Australia, England, Chile, and Singapore, while “very low if any” for Guatemala. Policy areas most frequently prioritized included taxes on unhealthy foods, restricting unhealthy food promotion and front-of-pack labelling. The Food-EPI was found to be a robust tool and process to benchmark governments' progress to create healthy food environments.

KW - accountability

KW - benchmarking

KW - food environments

KW - policy implementation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059533802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059533802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/obr.12819

DO - 10.1111/obr.12819

M3 - Article

JO - Obesity Reviews

JF - Obesity Reviews

SN - 1467-7881

ER -