A simulation study of proxy mobile IPV6 (PMIPV6) protocol

Farouk Abdul Jalin, Raed Alsaqour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) protocol was developed through the concept of Network-based Local Mobility Management (NetLMM). IP mobility features previously developed in various other mobility protocols are based on the host. Mobile Node (MN) needs to perform the process of signaling to the network topology involved when roaming to other locations and this scenario has caused problems including the need to implement the complex configuration of host mobility for signaling exchange conditions and route update. Accordingly, the PMIPv6 protocol gets rid of the burden to install mobility stack on MN.A number of mobility management protocols have been proposed for this purpose other than PMIPv6 such as Mobile IPv4 (MIPv4), Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6), Fast Mobile IPv6 (FMIPv6), and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6). However, various weaknesses were found in the implementation of mobility management protocol such as packet overhead, latency delivery and lack of support for data access optimization. In addition, analysis of previous studies found that the implementation of mobility protocol introduced high signaling cost, handover delays and the probability of failure of delivery. This paper aims to study investigates the performance of PMIPv6 protocol. Network Simulator (NS) version 2.29 is used to perform PMIPv6 protocol over UDP (User Datagram Protocol) and TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) traffics. The results of the study shown the performance of the PMIPv6 protocol under handover delay, packet delivery ratio and throughput performance metrics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4701-4706
Number of pages6
JournalARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Volume11
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Network protocols
Transmission control protocol
Simulators
Throughput
Topology
Costs

Keywords

  • Handover
  • Mobility management
  • PMIPv6
  • TCP
  • UDP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

A simulation study of proxy mobile IPV6 (PMIPV6) protocol. / Jalin, Farouk Abdul; Alsaqour, Raed.

In: ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 7, 01.04.2016, p. 4701-4706.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jalin, Farouk Abdul ; Alsaqour, Raed. / A simulation study of proxy mobile IPV6 (PMIPV6) protocol. In: ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 7. pp. 4701-4706.
@article{3f2ec29507c543719963369a325ca5e5,
title = "A simulation study of proxy mobile IPV6 (PMIPV6) protocol",
abstract = "Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) protocol was developed through the concept of Network-based Local Mobility Management (NetLMM). IP mobility features previously developed in various other mobility protocols are based on the host. Mobile Node (MN) needs to perform the process of signaling to the network topology involved when roaming to other locations and this scenario has caused problems including the need to implement the complex configuration of host mobility for signaling exchange conditions and route update. Accordingly, the PMIPv6 protocol gets rid of the burden to install mobility stack on MN.A number of mobility management protocols have been proposed for this purpose other than PMIPv6 such as Mobile IPv4 (MIPv4), Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6), Fast Mobile IPv6 (FMIPv6), and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6). However, various weaknesses were found in the implementation of mobility management protocol such as packet overhead, latency delivery and lack of support for data access optimization. In addition, analysis of previous studies found that the implementation of mobility protocol introduced high signaling cost, handover delays and the probability of failure of delivery. This paper aims to study investigates the performance of PMIPv6 protocol. Network Simulator (NS) version 2.29 is used to perform PMIPv6 protocol over UDP (User Datagram Protocol) and TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) traffics. The results of the study shown the performance of the PMIPv6 protocol under handover delay, packet delivery ratio and throughput performance metrics.",
keywords = "Handover, Mobility management, PMIPv6, TCP, UDP",
author = "Jalin, {Farouk Abdul} and Raed Alsaqour",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "4701--4706",
journal = "ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences",
issn = "1819-6608",
publisher = "Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN)",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A simulation study of proxy mobile IPV6 (PMIPV6) protocol

AU - Jalin, Farouk Abdul

AU - Alsaqour, Raed

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) protocol was developed through the concept of Network-based Local Mobility Management (NetLMM). IP mobility features previously developed in various other mobility protocols are based on the host. Mobile Node (MN) needs to perform the process of signaling to the network topology involved when roaming to other locations and this scenario has caused problems including the need to implement the complex configuration of host mobility for signaling exchange conditions and route update. Accordingly, the PMIPv6 protocol gets rid of the burden to install mobility stack on MN.A number of mobility management protocols have been proposed for this purpose other than PMIPv6 such as Mobile IPv4 (MIPv4), Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6), Fast Mobile IPv6 (FMIPv6), and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6). However, various weaknesses were found in the implementation of mobility management protocol such as packet overhead, latency delivery and lack of support for data access optimization. In addition, analysis of previous studies found that the implementation of mobility protocol introduced high signaling cost, handover delays and the probability of failure of delivery. This paper aims to study investigates the performance of PMIPv6 protocol. Network Simulator (NS) version 2.29 is used to perform PMIPv6 protocol over UDP (User Datagram Protocol) and TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) traffics. The results of the study shown the performance of the PMIPv6 protocol under handover delay, packet delivery ratio and throughput performance metrics.

AB - Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) protocol was developed through the concept of Network-based Local Mobility Management (NetLMM). IP mobility features previously developed in various other mobility protocols are based on the host. Mobile Node (MN) needs to perform the process of signaling to the network topology involved when roaming to other locations and this scenario has caused problems including the need to implement the complex configuration of host mobility for signaling exchange conditions and route update. Accordingly, the PMIPv6 protocol gets rid of the burden to install mobility stack on MN.A number of mobility management protocols have been proposed for this purpose other than PMIPv6 such as Mobile IPv4 (MIPv4), Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6), Fast Mobile IPv6 (FMIPv6), and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6). However, various weaknesses were found in the implementation of mobility management protocol such as packet overhead, latency delivery and lack of support for data access optimization. In addition, analysis of previous studies found that the implementation of mobility protocol introduced high signaling cost, handover delays and the probability of failure of delivery. This paper aims to study investigates the performance of PMIPv6 protocol. Network Simulator (NS) version 2.29 is used to perform PMIPv6 protocol over UDP (User Datagram Protocol) and TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) traffics. The results of the study shown the performance of the PMIPv6 protocol under handover delay, packet delivery ratio and throughput performance metrics.

KW - Handover

KW - Mobility management

KW - PMIPv6

KW - TCP

KW - UDP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973103009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973103009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 4701

EP - 4706

JO - ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

JF - ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

SN - 1819-6608

IS - 7

ER -