A prospective randomised comparison of bipolar diathermy versus conventional dorsal slit technique for ritual circumcision

A malaysian experience

M. M A Fariz, M. N M Tarmizi, M. H. Ainaini, A. M I Khairil, A. Faizal, Ismail Sagap

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Ritual circumcision is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the developing world. Various technique for circumcision has been described to increase patient's safety and to decrease operating time. This study will look at comparing the conventional method of circumcision using scissors and ligatures with bipolar diathermy. To compare the incidence of bleeding and infection in patients who underwent circumcision between using the bipolar diathermy technique with conventional surgery (dorsal slit) technique for circumcision. The operative time between the two techniques were also recorded. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized study was conducted in all children undergoing ritual circumcision at Raja Perempuan Zainab II Hospital, Malaysia over a 1-year period. Data analysed were the operation time,postoperative bleeding rates and infection rates. Results: A total of 341 patients were included in the study. Randomization resulted in 183 patients in conventional surgery group and 158 patients in bipolar group. The incidence of bleeding were signifi cantly better in the bipolar group compared to conventional group (3.1% vs 19.7%), (p<0.001). There was no signifi cant difference in the infection rate (1.3% vs 2.7%) (p=0.457). Operative times were shorter in the bipolar diathermy group (Mean 8.2 minutes) compared to conventional group (Mean 15.3 minutes) (p<0.01). Conclusion: Bipolar diathermy technique for circumcision is safe and quicker than the dorsal slit technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)543-545
Number of pages3
JournalClinica Terapeutica
Volume162
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Diathermy
Ceremonial Behavior
Operative Time
Infection
Skates (Fish)
Hemorrhage
Bleeding Time
Malaysia
Incidence
Patient Safety
Random Allocation
Ligation
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Bipolar diathermy
  • Circumcision
  • Dorsal slit technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A prospective randomised comparison of bipolar diathermy versus conventional dorsal slit technique for ritual circumcision : A malaysian experience. / Fariz, M. M A; Tarmizi, M. N M; Ainaini, M. H.; Khairil, A. M I; Faizal, A.; Sagap, Ismail.

In: Clinica Terapeutica, Vol. 162, No. 6, 2011, p. 543-545.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fariz, M. M A ; Tarmizi, M. N M ; Ainaini, M. H. ; Khairil, A. M I ; Faizal, A. ; Sagap, Ismail. / A prospective randomised comparison of bipolar diathermy versus conventional dorsal slit technique for ritual circumcision : A malaysian experience. In: Clinica Terapeutica. 2011 ; Vol. 162, No. 6. pp. 543-545.
@article{b37a3a93b2dd4de7bcb6201bbcd972d4,
title = "A prospective randomised comparison of bipolar diathermy versus conventional dorsal slit technique for ritual circumcision: A malaysian experience",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Ritual circumcision is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the developing world. Various technique for circumcision has been described to increase patient's safety and to decrease operating time. This study will look at comparing the conventional method of circumcision using scissors and ligatures with bipolar diathermy. To compare the incidence of bleeding and infection in patients who underwent circumcision between using the bipolar diathermy technique with conventional surgery (dorsal slit) technique for circumcision. The operative time between the two techniques were also recorded. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized study was conducted in all children undergoing ritual circumcision at Raja Perempuan Zainab II Hospital, Malaysia over a 1-year period. Data analysed were the operation time,postoperative bleeding rates and infection rates. Results: A total of 341 patients were included in the study. Randomization resulted in 183 patients in conventional surgery group and 158 patients in bipolar group. The incidence of bleeding were signifi cantly better in the bipolar group compared to conventional group (3.1{\%} vs 19.7{\%}), (p<0.001). There was no signifi cant difference in the infection rate (1.3{\%} vs 2.7{\%}) (p=0.457). Operative times were shorter in the bipolar diathermy group (Mean 8.2 minutes) compared to conventional group (Mean 15.3 minutes) (p<0.01). Conclusion: Bipolar diathermy technique for circumcision is safe and quicker than the dorsal slit technique.",
keywords = "Bipolar diathermy, Circumcision, Dorsal slit technique",
author = "Fariz, {M. M A} and Tarmizi, {M. N M} and Ainaini, {M. H.} and Khairil, {A. M I} and A. Faizal and Ismail Sagap",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "162",
pages = "543--545",
journal = "Clinica Terapeutica",
issn = "0009-9074",
publisher = "Societa Editrice Universo",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective randomised comparison of bipolar diathermy versus conventional dorsal slit technique for ritual circumcision

T2 - A malaysian experience

AU - Fariz, M. M A

AU - Tarmizi, M. N M

AU - Ainaini, M. H.

AU - Khairil, A. M I

AU - Faizal, A.

AU - Sagap, Ismail

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background and Objectives: Ritual circumcision is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the developing world. Various technique for circumcision has been described to increase patient's safety and to decrease operating time. This study will look at comparing the conventional method of circumcision using scissors and ligatures with bipolar diathermy. To compare the incidence of bleeding and infection in patients who underwent circumcision between using the bipolar diathermy technique with conventional surgery (dorsal slit) technique for circumcision. The operative time between the two techniques were also recorded. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized study was conducted in all children undergoing ritual circumcision at Raja Perempuan Zainab II Hospital, Malaysia over a 1-year period. Data analysed were the operation time,postoperative bleeding rates and infection rates. Results: A total of 341 patients were included in the study. Randomization resulted in 183 patients in conventional surgery group and 158 patients in bipolar group. The incidence of bleeding were signifi cantly better in the bipolar group compared to conventional group (3.1% vs 19.7%), (p<0.001). There was no signifi cant difference in the infection rate (1.3% vs 2.7%) (p=0.457). Operative times were shorter in the bipolar diathermy group (Mean 8.2 minutes) compared to conventional group (Mean 15.3 minutes) (p<0.01). Conclusion: Bipolar diathermy technique for circumcision is safe and quicker than the dorsal slit technique.

AB - Background and Objectives: Ritual circumcision is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the developing world. Various technique for circumcision has been described to increase patient's safety and to decrease operating time. This study will look at comparing the conventional method of circumcision using scissors and ligatures with bipolar diathermy. To compare the incidence of bleeding and infection in patients who underwent circumcision between using the bipolar diathermy technique with conventional surgery (dorsal slit) technique for circumcision. The operative time between the two techniques were also recorded. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized study was conducted in all children undergoing ritual circumcision at Raja Perempuan Zainab II Hospital, Malaysia over a 1-year period. Data analysed were the operation time,postoperative bleeding rates and infection rates. Results: A total of 341 patients were included in the study. Randomization resulted in 183 patients in conventional surgery group and 158 patients in bipolar group. The incidence of bleeding were signifi cantly better in the bipolar group compared to conventional group (3.1% vs 19.7%), (p<0.001). There was no signifi cant difference in the infection rate (1.3% vs 2.7%) (p=0.457). Operative times were shorter in the bipolar diathermy group (Mean 8.2 minutes) compared to conventional group (Mean 15.3 minutes) (p<0.01). Conclusion: Bipolar diathermy technique for circumcision is safe and quicker than the dorsal slit technique.

KW - Bipolar diathermy

KW - Circumcision

KW - Dorsal slit technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858405872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858405872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 162

SP - 543

EP - 545

JO - Clinica Terapeutica

JF - Clinica Terapeutica

SN - 0009-9074

IS - 6

ER -