A critical dialectical pluralistic examination of the lived experience of select women doctoral students

Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, Roslinda Rosli, Jacqueline M. Ingram, Rebecca K. Frels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore and to understand the daily life experiences of 8 women doctoral students who were in pursuit of their doctorates. A partially mixed concurrent dominant status design was utilized in this study embedded within a mixed methods phenomenological research lens and driven by a critical dialectical pluralistic philosophical stance. Specifically, these 8 students were interviewed individually to examine their lived experiences as doctoral students. The interview responses then were subjected to a sequential mixed analysis that was characterized by 2 qualitative analyses (i.e., constant comparison analysis, classical content analysis) and 1 quantitative analysis (i.e., correspondence analysis). The 2 qualitative analyses revealed the following 3 metathemes: adjustment (how these doctoral students made necessary accommodations with regard to all aspects of their lives), which comprised the themes of time management, interaction, belief, and lifestyle; encouragement (circumstances that motivated them to pursue their doctoral degrees), which comprised the themes of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation; and discouragement (circumstances that demotivated them from pursuing their doctoral degrees), which comprised the themes of internal discouragement and external discouragement. The correspondence analysis revealed a fourth metatheme, namely, marital status (separating the single students from the married/divorced students), which comprised the themes of locus of motivation and locus of discouragement. Seven of these women doctoral students struggled to balance either dual roles (i.e., as doctoral students and wives/mothers, or as doctoral students and professionals) or triple roles (i.e., as doctoral students, wives/mothers, and professionals). Implications of the findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5
JournalQualitative Report
Volume19
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Students
examination
experience
student
Motivation
correspondence analysis
Spouses
wife
Mothers
Time Management
Social Adjustment
extrinsic motivation
dual role
time management
Divorce
intrinsic motivation
Life Change Events
Marital Status
marital status
accommodation

Keywords

  • Critical dialectical pluralism
  • Descriptive phenomenology
  • Mixed methods
  • Mixed methods phenomenological research
  • Mixed research
  • Women doctoral students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

A critical dialectical pluralistic examination of the lived experience of select women doctoral students. / Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.; Rosli, Roslinda; Ingram, Jacqueline M.; Frels, Rebecca K.

In: Qualitative Report, Vol. 19, No. 3, 5, 20.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. ; Rosli, Roslinda ; Ingram, Jacqueline M. ; Frels, Rebecca K. / A critical dialectical pluralistic examination of the lived experience of select women doctoral students. In: Qualitative Report. 2014 ; Vol. 19, No. 3.
@article{fc06f1435952470db2ab3997472f2a2d,
title = "A critical dialectical pluralistic examination of the lived experience of select women doctoral students",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to explore and to understand the daily life experiences of 8 women doctoral students who were in pursuit of their doctorates. A partially mixed concurrent dominant status design was utilized in this study embedded within a mixed methods phenomenological research lens and driven by a critical dialectical pluralistic philosophical stance. Specifically, these 8 students were interviewed individually to examine their lived experiences as doctoral students. The interview responses then were subjected to a sequential mixed analysis that was characterized by 2 qualitative analyses (i.e., constant comparison analysis, classical content analysis) and 1 quantitative analysis (i.e., correspondence analysis). The 2 qualitative analyses revealed the following 3 metathemes: adjustment (how these doctoral students made necessary accommodations with regard to all aspects of their lives), which comprised the themes of time management, interaction, belief, and lifestyle; encouragement (circumstances that motivated them to pursue their doctoral degrees), which comprised the themes of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation; and discouragement (circumstances that demotivated them from pursuing their doctoral degrees), which comprised the themes of internal discouragement and external discouragement. The correspondence analysis revealed a fourth metatheme, namely, marital status (separating the single students from the married/divorced students), which comprised the themes of locus of motivation and locus of discouragement. Seven of these women doctoral students struggled to balance either dual roles (i.e., as doctoral students and wives/mothers, or as doctoral students and professionals) or triple roles (i.e., as doctoral students, wives/mothers, and professionals). Implications of the findings are discussed.",
keywords = "Critical dialectical pluralism, Descriptive phenomenology, Mixed methods, Mixed methods phenomenological research, Mixed research, Women doctoral students",
author = "Onwuegbuzie, {Anthony J.} and Roslinda Rosli and Ingram, {Jacqueline M.} and Frels, {Rebecca K.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "20",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "Qualitative Report",
issn = "1052-0147",
publisher = "Nova Southeastern University",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical dialectical pluralistic examination of the lived experience of select women doctoral students

AU - Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.

AU - Rosli, Roslinda

AU - Ingram, Jacqueline M.

AU - Frels, Rebecca K.

PY - 2014/1/20

Y1 - 2014/1/20

N2 - The purpose of this study was to explore and to understand the daily life experiences of 8 women doctoral students who were in pursuit of their doctorates. A partially mixed concurrent dominant status design was utilized in this study embedded within a mixed methods phenomenological research lens and driven by a critical dialectical pluralistic philosophical stance. Specifically, these 8 students were interviewed individually to examine their lived experiences as doctoral students. The interview responses then were subjected to a sequential mixed analysis that was characterized by 2 qualitative analyses (i.e., constant comparison analysis, classical content analysis) and 1 quantitative analysis (i.e., correspondence analysis). The 2 qualitative analyses revealed the following 3 metathemes: adjustment (how these doctoral students made necessary accommodations with regard to all aspects of their lives), which comprised the themes of time management, interaction, belief, and lifestyle; encouragement (circumstances that motivated them to pursue their doctoral degrees), which comprised the themes of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation; and discouragement (circumstances that demotivated them from pursuing their doctoral degrees), which comprised the themes of internal discouragement and external discouragement. The correspondence analysis revealed a fourth metatheme, namely, marital status (separating the single students from the married/divorced students), which comprised the themes of locus of motivation and locus of discouragement. Seven of these women doctoral students struggled to balance either dual roles (i.e., as doctoral students and wives/mothers, or as doctoral students and professionals) or triple roles (i.e., as doctoral students, wives/mothers, and professionals). Implications of the findings are discussed.

AB - The purpose of this study was to explore and to understand the daily life experiences of 8 women doctoral students who were in pursuit of their doctorates. A partially mixed concurrent dominant status design was utilized in this study embedded within a mixed methods phenomenological research lens and driven by a critical dialectical pluralistic philosophical stance. Specifically, these 8 students were interviewed individually to examine their lived experiences as doctoral students. The interview responses then were subjected to a sequential mixed analysis that was characterized by 2 qualitative analyses (i.e., constant comparison analysis, classical content analysis) and 1 quantitative analysis (i.e., correspondence analysis). The 2 qualitative analyses revealed the following 3 metathemes: adjustment (how these doctoral students made necessary accommodations with regard to all aspects of their lives), which comprised the themes of time management, interaction, belief, and lifestyle; encouragement (circumstances that motivated them to pursue their doctoral degrees), which comprised the themes of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation; and discouragement (circumstances that demotivated them from pursuing their doctoral degrees), which comprised the themes of internal discouragement and external discouragement. The correspondence analysis revealed a fourth metatheme, namely, marital status (separating the single students from the married/divorced students), which comprised the themes of locus of motivation and locus of discouragement. Seven of these women doctoral students struggled to balance either dual roles (i.e., as doctoral students and wives/mothers, or as doctoral students and professionals) or triple roles (i.e., as doctoral students, wives/mothers, and professionals). Implications of the findings are discussed.

KW - Critical dialectical pluralism

KW - Descriptive phenomenology

KW - Mixed methods

KW - Mixed methods phenomenological research

KW - Mixed research

KW - Women doctoral students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892769844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892769844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - Qualitative Report

JF - Qualitative Report

SN - 1052-0147

IS - 3

M1 - 5

ER -