A costing methodology for dengue

Ah Choy Er, Mohd. Ekhwan Toriman, Rozita Hod, Sharifah Mastura Syed Abdullah, Mazrura Sahani, Hidayatulfathi Othma, Saperi Sulong, Amrizal Muhammad Nur, Nor Rohaizah Jamil, Lee Qiao Yun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever have been on an increasing trend for the past two decades. The aim of this study is to determine the cost of illness as a result of dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever. The research method is based on the calculation of cost of illness. Cost-of-illness is operationalized via direct and indirect costs. Intangible costs is not taken into consideration as it is the most controversial and the hardest to measure. The cost of illness for dengue fever is RM 1,771 as compared to RM 1,805 for dengue haemorrhagic fever. The ratios of cost of illness for dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever vis-a-vis the average GDP per capita for the period 2002-2008 are 8.6 and 8.8%, respectively. This is a fairly sizeable burden and if the number of patients were to increase, the financial burden on key stakeholders like the government, patients and caregivers will be even higher. Lost productivity is the only constituent in indirect costs. If data were available for other constituents like sick leave, the indirect costs and likewise the total cost of illness will even be higher. As the calculation of cost of illness is based on mean length of stay, the quantum of financial burden will even be higher if the length of stay is longer than the mean length of stay for both dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-23
Number of pages4
JournalSocial Sciences
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

methodology
costs
illness
sick leave
caregiver
research method
productivity
stakeholder
trend

Keywords

  • Cost-of-illness
  • Dengue fever
  • Dengue haemorrhagic fever
  • Direct costs
  • Indirect costs
  • Malaysia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

A costing methodology for dengue. / Er, Ah Choy; Toriman, Mohd. Ekhwan; Hod, Rozita; Syed Abdullah, Sharifah Mastura; Sahani, Mazrura; Othma, Hidayatulfathi; Sulong, Saperi; Nur, Amrizal Muhammad; Jamil, Nor Rohaizah; Yun, Lee Qiao.

In: Social Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2012, p. 20-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Er, Ah Choy ; Toriman, Mohd. Ekhwan ; Hod, Rozita ; Syed Abdullah, Sharifah Mastura ; Sahani, Mazrura ; Othma, Hidayatulfathi ; Sulong, Saperi ; Nur, Amrizal Muhammad ; Jamil, Nor Rohaizah ; Yun, Lee Qiao. / A costing methodology for dengue. In: Social Sciences. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 20-23.
@article{a4be51befb18447391c1933acf49fc7f,
title = "A costing methodology for dengue",
abstract = "Dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever have been on an increasing trend for the past two decades. The aim of this study is to determine the cost of illness as a result of dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever. The research method is based on the calculation of cost of illness. Cost-of-illness is operationalized via direct and indirect costs. Intangible costs is not taken into consideration as it is the most controversial and the hardest to measure. The cost of illness for dengue fever is RM 1,771 as compared to RM 1,805 for dengue haemorrhagic fever. The ratios of cost of illness for dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever vis-a-vis the average GDP per capita for the period 2002-2008 are 8.6 and 8.8{\%}, respectively. This is a fairly sizeable burden and if the number of patients were to increase, the financial burden on key stakeholders like the government, patients and caregivers will be even higher. Lost productivity is the only constituent in indirect costs. If data were available for other constituents like sick leave, the indirect costs and likewise the total cost of illness will even be higher. As the calculation of cost of illness is based on mean length of stay, the quantum of financial burden will even be higher if the length of stay is longer than the mean length of stay for both dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever.",
keywords = "Cost-of-illness, Dengue fever, Dengue haemorrhagic fever, Direct costs, Indirect costs, Malaysia",
author = "Er, {Ah Choy} and Toriman, {Mohd. Ekhwan} and Rozita Hod and {Syed Abdullah}, {Sharifah Mastura} and Mazrura Sahani and Hidayatulfathi Othma and Saperi Sulong and Nur, {Amrizal Muhammad} and Jamil, {Nor Rohaizah} and Yun, {Lee Qiao}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.3923/sscience.2012.20.23",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "20--23",
journal = "Social Sciences (Pakistan)",
issn = "1818-5800",
publisher = "Medwell Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A costing methodology for dengue

AU - Er, Ah Choy

AU - Toriman, Mohd. Ekhwan

AU - Hod, Rozita

AU - Syed Abdullah, Sharifah Mastura

AU - Sahani, Mazrura

AU - Othma, Hidayatulfathi

AU - Sulong, Saperi

AU - Nur, Amrizal Muhammad

AU - Jamil, Nor Rohaizah

AU - Yun, Lee Qiao

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever have been on an increasing trend for the past two decades. The aim of this study is to determine the cost of illness as a result of dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever. The research method is based on the calculation of cost of illness. Cost-of-illness is operationalized via direct and indirect costs. Intangible costs is not taken into consideration as it is the most controversial and the hardest to measure. The cost of illness for dengue fever is RM 1,771 as compared to RM 1,805 for dengue haemorrhagic fever. The ratios of cost of illness for dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever vis-a-vis the average GDP per capita for the period 2002-2008 are 8.6 and 8.8%, respectively. This is a fairly sizeable burden and if the number of patients were to increase, the financial burden on key stakeholders like the government, patients and caregivers will be even higher. Lost productivity is the only constituent in indirect costs. If data were available for other constituents like sick leave, the indirect costs and likewise the total cost of illness will even be higher. As the calculation of cost of illness is based on mean length of stay, the quantum of financial burden will even be higher if the length of stay is longer than the mean length of stay for both dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever.

AB - Dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever have been on an increasing trend for the past two decades. The aim of this study is to determine the cost of illness as a result of dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever. The research method is based on the calculation of cost of illness. Cost-of-illness is operationalized via direct and indirect costs. Intangible costs is not taken into consideration as it is the most controversial and the hardest to measure. The cost of illness for dengue fever is RM 1,771 as compared to RM 1,805 for dengue haemorrhagic fever. The ratios of cost of illness for dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever vis-a-vis the average GDP per capita for the period 2002-2008 are 8.6 and 8.8%, respectively. This is a fairly sizeable burden and if the number of patients were to increase, the financial burden on key stakeholders like the government, patients and caregivers will be even higher. Lost productivity is the only constituent in indirect costs. If data were available for other constituents like sick leave, the indirect costs and likewise the total cost of illness will even be higher. As the calculation of cost of illness is based on mean length of stay, the quantum of financial burden will even be higher if the length of stay is longer than the mean length of stay for both dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever.

KW - Cost-of-illness

KW - Dengue fever

KW - Dengue haemorrhagic fever

KW - Direct costs

KW - Indirect costs

KW - Malaysia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860752922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860752922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3923/sscience.2012.20.23

DO - 10.3923/sscience.2012.20.23

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 20

EP - 23

JO - Social Sciences (Pakistan)

JF - Social Sciences (Pakistan)

SN - 1818-5800

IS - 1

ER -