A Comparison between Laryngeal Tube Suction II airway TM and Proseal TM Laryngeal Mask Airway in Laparascopic Surgery

Esa Kamaruzaman, Azarinah Izaham, Muhammad Maaya, M. A. Helmi, Jaafar Md Zain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This was a prospective randomized study comparing the ease of insertion, haemodynamic changes, quality of airway seal, oxygenation and ventilation parameters and complications between Laryngeal Tube Suction II TM (LTS II TM) with Proseal TM Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA TM), both are supraglottic airway incorporated with gastric passage. Fiftyfour ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated to receive either LTS II TM or PLMA TM. Both devices provided a secure airway even under conditions of elevated intra-abdominal pressure up to 17 mmHg. In this study, there were no differences concerning ease of insertion, haemodynamic changes, quality of airway seal, oxygenation and ventilation parameters and complications between LTS II TM and PLMA TM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-186
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Journal of Malaysia
Volume66
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Laryngeal Masks
Suction
Ventilation
Hemodynamics
Stomach
Prospective Studies
Pressure
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Airway seal
  • Haemodynamic
  • Laparoscopic
  • Lma
  • Lts
  • Oxygenation
  • Ventilation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{59766b8fcf144ac4b7677fab976b9500,
title = "A Comparison between Laryngeal Tube Suction II airway TM and Proseal TM Laryngeal Mask Airway in Laparascopic Surgery",
abstract = "This was a prospective randomized study comparing the ease of insertion, haemodynamic changes, quality of airway seal, oxygenation and ventilation parameters and complications between Laryngeal Tube Suction II TM (LTS II TM) with Proseal TM Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA TM), both are supraglottic airway incorporated with gastric passage. Fiftyfour ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated to receive either LTS II TM or PLMA TM. Both devices provided a secure airway even under conditions of elevated intra-abdominal pressure up to 17 mmHg. In this study, there were no differences concerning ease of insertion, haemodynamic changes, quality of airway seal, oxygenation and ventilation parameters and complications between LTS II TM and PLMA TM.",
keywords = "Airway seal, Haemodynamic, Laparoscopic, Lma, Lts, Oxygenation, Ventilation",
author = "Esa Kamaruzaman and Azarinah Izaham and Muhammad Maaya and Helmi, {M. A.} and {Md Zain}, Jaafar",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "182--186",
journal = "Medical Journal of Malaysia",
issn = "0300-5283",
publisher = "Malaysian Medical Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison between Laryngeal Tube Suction II airway TM and Proseal TM Laryngeal Mask Airway in Laparascopic Surgery

AU - Kamaruzaman, Esa

AU - Izaham, Azarinah

AU - Maaya, Muhammad

AU - Helmi, M. A.

AU - Md Zain, Jaafar

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - This was a prospective randomized study comparing the ease of insertion, haemodynamic changes, quality of airway seal, oxygenation and ventilation parameters and complications between Laryngeal Tube Suction II TM (LTS II TM) with Proseal TM Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA TM), both are supraglottic airway incorporated with gastric passage. Fiftyfour ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated to receive either LTS II TM or PLMA TM. Both devices provided a secure airway even under conditions of elevated intra-abdominal pressure up to 17 mmHg. In this study, there were no differences concerning ease of insertion, haemodynamic changes, quality of airway seal, oxygenation and ventilation parameters and complications between LTS II TM and PLMA TM.

AB - This was a prospective randomized study comparing the ease of insertion, haemodynamic changes, quality of airway seal, oxygenation and ventilation parameters and complications between Laryngeal Tube Suction II TM (LTS II TM) with Proseal TM Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA TM), both are supraglottic airway incorporated with gastric passage. Fiftyfour ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated to receive either LTS II TM or PLMA TM. Both devices provided a secure airway even under conditions of elevated intra-abdominal pressure up to 17 mmHg. In this study, there were no differences concerning ease of insertion, haemodynamic changes, quality of airway seal, oxygenation and ventilation parameters and complications between LTS II TM and PLMA TM.

KW - Airway seal

KW - Haemodynamic

KW - Laparoscopic

KW - Lma

KW - Lts

KW - Oxygenation

KW - Ventilation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054124622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054124622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 22111436

AN - SCOPUS:80054124622

VL - 66

SP - 182

EP - 186

JO - Medical Journal of Malaysia

JF - Medical Journal of Malaysia

SN - 0300-5283

IS - 3

ER -