A comparative study of the effects of substrate composite materials on external and internal handset antenna EM absorption

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Cellular phones are used in the vicinity of a human head, which absorbs power from antenna radiation. This investigation analyzes the effects of antenna substrate materials on electromagnetic (EM) absorption in a human head. Antennas are used in analysis with four different dielectric substrate materials, which are Bakelite, FR4 glass epoxy, Rogers R04003, and Taconic TLC. Moreover, two different thicknesses of each substrate are considered in the experimental setup. The EM absorption associated with two types of cell phone antennas is evaluated in the closed vicinity of the human head model. One of them is planar inverted-F antenna (PIFA), which is used as the internal handset antenna and another one is helical antenna, which is used as external handset antenna. This investigation consists of two different operating frequency bands, GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz. The EM absorption in the human head is presented using the peak specific absorption rate (SAR) and total absorbed power (TAP) by the user. The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method based on Computer Simulation Technology (CST) Microwave studio is utilized in this investigation. The obtained results show that the substrate materials do not effect SAR and TAP values considerably for both antennas, but substrate thickness affects the SAR and TAP values significantly. In addition, the substrate thickness affects the SAR and TAP values significantly in most of the cases Moreover, PIFA produces lower SAR than that of a helical antenna significantly for both GSM and DCS frequency band.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)376-380
Number of pages5
JournalMedziagotyra
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Electromagnetic wave absorption
Antennas
Composite materials
Substrates
Helical antennas
Global system for mobile communications
Frequency bands
Antenna radiation
Finite difference time domain method
Studios
Microwaves
Glass

Keywords

  • EM absorption
  • Helical antenna
  • PIFA
  • SAR
  • Substrate materials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

@article{c056704e839143c3ab71c7e853155778,
title = "A comparative study of the effects of substrate composite materials on external and internal handset antenna EM absorption",
abstract = "Cellular phones are used in the vicinity of a human head, which absorbs power from antenna radiation. This investigation analyzes the effects of antenna substrate materials on electromagnetic (EM) absorption in a human head. Antennas are used in analysis with four different dielectric substrate materials, which are Bakelite, FR4 glass epoxy, Rogers R04003, and Taconic TLC. Moreover, two different thicknesses of each substrate are considered in the experimental setup. The EM absorption associated with two types of cell phone antennas is evaluated in the closed vicinity of the human head model. One of them is planar inverted-F antenna (PIFA), which is used as the internal handset antenna and another one is helical antenna, which is used as external handset antenna. This investigation consists of two different operating frequency bands, GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz. The EM absorption in the human head is presented using the peak specific absorption rate (SAR) and total absorbed power (TAP) by the user. The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method based on Computer Simulation Technology (CST) Microwave studio is utilized in this investigation. The obtained results show that the substrate materials do not effect SAR and TAP values considerably for both antennas, but substrate thickness affects the SAR and TAP values significantly. In addition, the substrate thickness affects the SAR and TAP values significantly in most of the cases Moreover, PIFA produces lower SAR than that of a helical antenna significantly for both GSM and DCS frequency band.",
keywords = "EM absorption, Helical antenna, PIFA, SAR, Substrate materials",
author = "Hossain, {Md Ikbal} and Faruque, {Mohammad Rashed Iqbal} and Islam, {Mohammad Tariqul}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.5755/j01.ms.22.3.8889",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "376--380",
journal = "Medziagotyra",
issn = "1392-1320",
publisher = "Kauno Technologijos Universitetas",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of the effects of substrate composite materials on external and internal handset antenna EM absorption

AU - Hossain, Md Ikbal

AU - Faruque, Mohammad Rashed Iqbal

AU - Islam, Mohammad Tariqul

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Cellular phones are used in the vicinity of a human head, which absorbs power from antenna radiation. This investigation analyzes the effects of antenna substrate materials on electromagnetic (EM) absorption in a human head. Antennas are used in analysis with four different dielectric substrate materials, which are Bakelite, FR4 glass epoxy, Rogers R04003, and Taconic TLC. Moreover, two different thicknesses of each substrate are considered in the experimental setup. The EM absorption associated with two types of cell phone antennas is evaluated in the closed vicinity of the human head model. One of them is planar inverted-F antenna (PIFA), which is used as the internal handset antenna and another one is helical antenna, which is used as external handset antenna. This investigation consists of two different operating frequency bands, GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz. The EM absorption in the human head is presented using the peak specific absorption rate (SAR) and total absorbed power (TAP) by the user. The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method based on Computer Simulation Technology (CST) Microwave studio is utilized in this investigation. The obtained results show that the substrate materials do not effect SAR and TAP values considerably for both antennas, but substrate thickness affects the SAR and TAP values significantly. In addition, the substrate thickness affects the SAR and TAP values significantly in most of the cases Moreover, PIFA produces lower SAR than that of a helical antenna significantly for both GSM and DCS frequency band.

AB - Cellular phones are used in the vicinity of a human head, which absorbs power from antenna radiation. This investigation analyzes the effects of antenna substrate materials on electromagnetic (EM) absorption in a human head. Antennas are used in analysis with four different dielectric substrate materials, which are Bakelite, FR4 glass epoxy, Rogers R04003, and Taconic TLC. Moreover, two different thicknesses of each substrate are considered in the experimental setup. The EM absorption associated with two types of cell phone antennas is evaluated in the closed vicinity of the human head model. One of them is planar inverted-F antenna (PIFA), which is used as the internal handset antenna and another one is helical antenna, which is used as external handset antenna. This investigation consists of two different operating frequency bands, GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz. The EM absorption in the human head is presented using the peak specific absorption rate (SAR) and total absorbed power (TAP) by the user. The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method based on Computer Simulation Technology (CST) Microwave studio is utilized in this investigation. The obtained results show that the substrate materials do not effect SAR and TAP values considerably for both antennas, but substrate thickness affects the SAR and TAP values significantly. In addition, the substrate thickness affects the SAR and TAP values significantly in most of the cases Moreover, PIFA produces lower SAR than that of a helical antenna significantly for both GSM and DCS frequency band.

KW - EM absorption

KW - Helical antenna

KW - PIFA

KW - SAR

KW - Substrate materials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985031427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84985031427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5755/j01.ms.22.3.8889

DO - 10.5755/j01.ms.22.3.8889

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 376

EP - 380

JO - Medziagotyra

JF - Medziagotyra

SN - 1392-1320

IS - 3

ER -